The "Christine" Conundrum: Why are Democrats losing the "white woman" vote?

The "Christine" Conundrum: Why are Democrats losing the "white woman" vote?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

According Gallup polling available exclusively to The Daily Beast, Democrats are "losing support among white women" as the upcoming November mid-term elections approach. In her article, Linda Hirshman points out that "it's the independent women (21 percent!) and the Democratic women (24 percent) who aren't revved up about the coming midterms."

Well, color me Christine O'Donnell. Perhaps the reason independent and Democratic women aren't "revved" up is because they actually have something known as "brains" in between their ears. It doesn't take a rocket scientist -- or for that matter, a recent college graduate who can't find a job -- to take a look around and see that while Sarah Palin's daughter does the cha-cha and enchants the hearts of millions, Sarah Palin's tea party is busy imprinting the minds of the remainder. And with the most prominent, popular female "leaders" splashed on TV in the neverending news cycle being Palin and O'Donnell, who in their right mind would be revved up by them?

That's not to say there aren't smart women left to engage. As a woman who follows progressive politics in a conservative state, I can't help but feel outnumbered. For each smart, intelligent, politically involved woman I come across on a daily basis -- and there are many -- there are at least two smart, intelligent women who have absolutely no intention of participating in politics, let alone voting. Occasionally I make the mistake of trying to have a conversation with them about why that is. Some choose that path because they're too busy trying to scrape by and don't see how government directly influences their lives. Others see the political process as intimidating and confusing or, worse yet, broken. A recent Women's Monitor poll done for EMILY's List, a national group that supports progressive female candidates, found that sixty-nine percent of women voters would be more interested in voting "if they knew their vote would send a message to Washington that it's time to get things done for everyday people and stop posturing and serving the special interests."

Whatever their reasoning, it has less to do with disagreeing with an amendment some Congressman stuck in a bill and more to do with the perception that the bill doesn't matter anyway. Oh, and that American Idol comes on at 7 and they still have to go for jog and pick up sushi to-go. The political apathy that my generation feels -- made worse by "Dear Liza, Dear Liza" refrain of "Then fix it, Obama" -- is easily blamed on the Woodstock-turned-Wall Street generation allowing the system to become corrupt or that it's easier to tweet about a revolution than it is to lead one. But, really, it's too late to even point fingers. After all, money never sleeps and now, thanks to our inability to give a shit or wake up before 10 am or make meaningful contributions to something other than bars and IKEA, it picks our elected officials.

I use the term "our" loosely because, obviously, there are all colors and creeds of women out there doing great things and just as many young white men as there are women in my circles who could care less about anything other than Halo and college football. But until the uninvolved "white women" start to feel as passionately about, say, protecting their reproductive rights as the puritans who agree with Christine O'Donnell's Stepforidan ideals, they're not going to come out to the polls.

So what will it take? Well, here's what keeps me up at night -- maybe it'll give you nightmares, too: You never really know how much someone's willing to fight for something until it gets taken away from them. Put that under your pillow and sleep on it.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot