The Blog

The Good News About Sarah Palin's Hypocritically Bad Math

Never before has there been somebody so clearly hypocritical, so obviously agenda-based, and so unabashedly opportunistic in her demagoguery and indignation as Sarah Palin.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

First the facts, from Palin's softball visit to Fox News Sunday, as posted by Huffpost's Sam Stein:


"...The former governor went to great and sometimes awkward lengths to insist that when conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh used the same exact term to describe the same exact group, it was simply in the role of political humorist.

"They are kooks, so I agree with Rush Limbaugh," she said, when read a quote of Limbaugh calling liberal groups "retards." "Rush Limbaugh was using satire ... . I didn't hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with 'f-ing retards,' and we did know that Rahm Emanuel, as has been reported, did say that. There is a big difference there."

Yes, of course there is. And it's very simple math:

If (Person) says (Thing Sarah Doesn't Like) is (Righter Than or Equal To) Palin, it's fine.


If (Different Person) says (Thing Sarah Doesn't Like) is (Left Of) Palin, it's the worst thing in the whole wide world.

See? Rush is a satirist. Then again, so is Letterman. However:

(Letterman) who (Made Comment Palin Didn't Like) is (Left Of) Palin, therefore, it's bad.

See how simple that is? Was what Letterman said insensitive? Sure.

Substitute Letterman with Glenn Beck, and the formula states she's laughing with him, not calling for his head.

It's the most basic of math - no calculator required. Which is what makes it so awesome.

Never before has there been somebody so clearly hypocritical, so obviously agenda-based, and so unabashedly opportunistic in her demagoguery and indignance that a person is left with only one of two choices: Reject it, because it's a double standard, or accept it and be the double standard.

Watching her moral outrage collapse like a deck chair when she had to decide whether to criticize someone she needs - to stay beloved, to remain in the news, to run for President in 2012 - this is a priceless and teachable moment.

Americans can be divided by a lot of things: Politics, religion, race, gender, sexual orientation, war, national security... the list is mind-boggling.

They can be divided by the use of the word "Retard," which was just used in The Fantastic Four - Enjoy The Debate Here - as a young girl calls her less intelligent little brother the word in a teasing and loving way. To be honest, even I found that a little off-putting.

You name the issue, everyone from individual Americans to screaming pundits on Fox News or MSNBC will be lobbing verbal grenades at each other. And that's fine.

I will naively say that left or right, a person can have a strong opinion - one that can be hopefully debated like adults (regardless of how little that seems to be happening these days). If that opinion is consistent, you might not like it... but you should try to at respect it.

But we don't have to do that with Palin anymore. This was a litmus test - She doesn't have opinions, she has opportunities. She doesn't have convictions, she has convenience.

And as long:

(Person) plus (Incident) does not always equal (Same Opinion)...

Her Opinion = Zero.