Trump's Conflicts Of Interest Are Unprecedented In American History

U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump smiles after making what he said was a major announcement, that he'd abide
U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump smiles after making what he said was a major announcement, that he'd abide by the election results if he won, to supporters at a campaign rally in Delaware, Ohio, U.S. October 20, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

President-Elect Trump is on track to enter office with the most blatant and potentially corrupting conflicts of interest in the history of American politics.

His Trump Organization companies span the globe and a vast array of business lines. Rather than separate himself fully from the corporation, however, he proposes to transfer control to a misnamed "blind trust" under the direction of his children. More of an all-seeing trust, this arrangement would do nothing to eliminate the staggering conflicts posed by ongoing connection to the Trump Organization.

So long as Trump maintains his ownership stake, the conflicts are pervasive and inescapable, no matter his intentions -- although there is no reason to assume President Trump would try to diminish conflicts. During the election campaign, he showed no compunction about mixing business and politics - remember his hotel promotion disguised as a news conference or, more perniciously, his racist intimidation of a federal judge overseeing litigation involving Trump University. Astoundingly, the president-elect just took a meeting with Indian businessmen who are building a Trump-branded luxury apartment complex in Mumbai. Making matters still worse is his reliance on his children as political advisors at the same time they are charged with running the Trump Organization businesses; and the children themselves seem inclined to mix business and politics.

This is not an esoteric issue. Unless eliminated through a plan for Trump to divest his ownership of the businesses, those conflicts of interest will materially affect national policy-making across a broad range of areas.

  • The president-elect just settled litigation claiming that students at so-called Trump University were defrauded. Their ability to bring that litigation depended on rules relating to class actions - which Big Business and Republicans aim to curtail - and basic consumer protections.
  • Workers at a Trump hotel in Las Vegas are involved in a bitter labor dispute about their ability to form a union, with the Trump business spending half a million dollars last year on a union-busting consulting firm. The National Labor Relations Board just ruled that the Trump hotel is violating federal law and ordered it to bargain with the workers' union. That ongoing dispute embroils the Trump directly in a current matter under adjudication; even more importantly, it gives him direct commercial interest in labor law standards. Rolling back modest union protections - including rules involving the use of union-busting consultants - is a top priority of Big Business.
  • The centerpiece of Trump's business empire is construction, a dangerous business for workers. Roofing, iron work, electrical installation and construction labor are among the most dangerous occupations, with fatality rates 5 to 15 times higher than the general population. A wide range of workplace health and safety standards, including many directly related to construction, will be under review as the Trump administration takes office.
  • The Trump Organization has relied on Deutsche Bank as a preferred lender. The U.S. Department of Justice is involved in intensive negotiations with the megabank over its role in the 2008 financial crash. The bank's stock has been crashing because of the size of the settlement the Justice Department has reportedly sought. Markets apparently think President Trump will show more kindness to his bankers - Deutsche Bank's stock price spiked 20 percent after the election.
  • The Trump Organization and Donald Trump have famously made creative use of the bankruptcy and tax laws, to put the matter charitably. Will the Trump administration - which is making tax legislation an early top priority - really favor changes in these crucial areas that injure the Trump business empire?

The conflicts go on and on. The newly opened Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., located in the Old Post Office Building, just blocks away from the White House, will require the Trump organization to engage in frequent negotiation and dispute resolution with the government that Donald J. Trump himself heads. Foreign diplomats have already told The Washington Post they plan to stay at the hotel as a way to curry favor with the new president. "Why wouldn't I stay at his hotel blocks from the White House, so I can tell the new president, 'I love your new hotel!' Isn't it rude to come to his city and say, 'I am staying at your competitor?'" said one Asian diplomat.

Given the global scope of the Trump business complex, the possibility for foreign entanglements are especially great. How is the public to determine whether a foreign government or government-controlled enterprise negotiating with a Trump Organization business decided to go easy in a deal, or throw in a little extraneous sweetener? There's no way. Even if they are negotiating in good faith, it will be impossible for the Trump Organization representatives - who may well be the Trump children - to know.

These conflicts will be pervasive, unavoidable and consequential. The only way to avoid them is for Donald Trump to divest himself of his holdings in the business, which is what leading democracy advocates, including Public Citizen, and ethics attorneys are urging him to do. This would mean selling off his shares, not transferring them to his children. His children should separate themselves completely from the business, as well; at minimum, if they stay involved, they must be completely walled off from any policy discussions at the White House.

There are difficult ethical problems in life. This is not one of those. You can add your voice to those calling for President-Elect Donald Trump to divest his business holdings here.

Donald Trump was elected to the presidency with a promise to eliminate improper business influence in Washington, to break the stranglehold that commercial interests impose on government. There is no way to square that campaign commitment - and the even higher, ethical duties of the president - with the rampant, inescapable conflicts that will engulf the presidency if Trump maintains connections with the Trump Organization, including by maintaining ownership with control transferred to his children.

It's not asking much for the American people to be assured that Trump is not running the government to benefit his own corporate empire.