The Republican 'Great White Hope:' Manipulating Election Laws

We have been victimized by carefully-calibrated public relations campaigns alleging that loyal, upstanding, law-abiding Americans are being negated by voter corruption. It is not true. Make no mistake: This is a Republican, corporate-funded effort to exclude American citizens from the voting process.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Across the land, Republican state legislators have shouted "voter fraud, voter fraud" to justify various schemes to restrict voting. Legislative actions, written by the corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), are intended to hamper African-American and Latino voting. Legislators have all but said that they can smell the Rio Grande on new voters. But they "cry wolf" and have created a public understanding that in no way reflects reality. In short, voting restrictions are the very fraud.

The disputed Bush-Gore election of 2000 galvanized Republicans, keenly aware how America's unfolding demographics threatened to make them a permanent minority national party, overwhelmed by emergent, enlarging blocs of ethnic and racial groups. Since then, we have been victimized by carefully-calibrated public relations campaigns alleging that loyal, upstanding, law-abiding Americans are being negated by voter corruption. It is not true.
Make no mistake: This is a Republican, corporate-funded effort to exclude American citizens from the voting process.

Fifty years ago, we battled to expand the American electorate to include those deliberately excluded; today's battles are intended to reverse that achievement. Richard Nixon, a man with sharp political antennae, enthusiastically endorsed 18-year-old voting, seeing it as a potential for Republican support. It may be hard to believe, but Nixon once was a young man very much attracted to the then-progressive wing of the Republican Party. His insight proved prophetic when young voters flocked to vote for Ronald Reagan.

Voter ID restrictions enacted by Republican legislatures and governors curiously have been elected by "the people." Were their victorious elections tainted or corrupted with voter fraud? Of course not. Their unstated goal was to prevent Barack Obama's reelection and overcome the abomination of his 2008 victory. Now, they have launched a determined effort to maintain the power of their basic white constituency.

Most recently, presidential wannabe Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, determined as he is to repeal the 20th century, announced that he and his dutiful Republican legislative majority will have legislation to regulate voting by the next election -- meaning his own. He calls voter ID the most "pressing" election issue in Wisconsin and he wants the "proper requirements in place" before November 2014. In the meantime, he promised to monitor pending court cases, both in state and federal courts, to determine whether legislation was needed to "address any concerns" that courts might have. More than concerns, Walker and his allies indicated that the legislature would override any adverse court decision against the restrictions.

The assault against voting rights comes in various forms. For now, Walker is pleased that the legislature dutifully restricted early and absentee balloting after 7:00 p.m. or on weekends. The legislature certainly is creative with their rationalizations. One senator contended that rural election clerks lacked staff for too many hours of early voting, thus giving an advantage to large municipalities.

"We are not restricting anyone's voting," he contended, cynically disregarding the comparative sizes of municipalities. But the real question is why the state has an interest in denying access to voting other than to disenfranchise some.

ALEC, heavily funded by the Koch brothers and like-minded allies, has designed the legislation to restrict voting, and circulated their draft bills around the nation, which their members, essentially well-financed Republican state legislators, eagerly adopt as their own. Republicans are blatantly trying to limit the electorate and rig elections. They have actively, enthusiastically launched the fray with an unrestrained prattle of fraud.

Paul Weyrich, a leader of numerous conservative causes and a founder of ALEC, minced no words more than 30 years ago: "I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people. They never have been from the beginning of our country, and they are not now. As a matter of fact our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."

Weyrich and his clients would not rely on voter apathy, indifference or ignorance to ensure low voter turnout. Enter the handle of "voter fraud" to justify legislation to prevent the "unwashed" from voting. Ideologically-driven mandates have little affinity for the truth. Voter ID laws are reminiscent of legislation enacted in the late 19th century by elites increasingly concerned by the emergence of new voters. Read working class immigrants from Eastern or Southern Europe, different in language, religion and class than most Americans. At the same time, southern states enacted Jim Crow laws which denied suffrage to former slaves, who, under the terms of the 14th Amendment nevertheless were citizens of the United States. The nation remained largely white, rural and Protestant for another half century.

The 1960s witnessed a surge of new laws expanding access to suffrage. After a century of neglect, the 1965 Voting Rights act fulfilled the promise of the "right to vote" in the Reconstruction Era's 15th Amendment. Registration laws restricting voting fell by the wayside. Many states allowed registration on voting day, and 18-year-olds secured the right to vote with the passage of the 26th Amendment. Consensus came easily as the ratification process required less than four months.

By the 1990s, states generally expanded voting and absentee balloting, and again consensus prevailed with bipartisan support. But the Republican Party, aided and abetted by the money and influence of the Koch brothers and Karl Rove's advocacy organization, now openly opposes and seeks to reverse nearly four decades of broadening and improving access for the electorate.

In the 2004 Presidential election, only five states had a photo ID law, but in each voters could sign an affidavit at the polls attesting to their eligibility. Two years later, Indiana enacted a "strict" photo ID law, requiring voters to present a photo ID without exception. A number of states fell into line and in 2013, six states passed strict laws, bringing to 19 the number of states with photo ID laws, 11 of them being strict. Unquestionably, plentiful evidence demonstrates that the laws have burdened the poor, the elderly, the disabled, and ethnic and racial minorities, and people often without the financial or physical resources to cope. While states often will provide a free birth certificate, many citizens have no idea where to find them.

A recent study found that 6 percent of white people do not have a photo ID, but for African-Americans, the rate is 25 percent. The study also found 16 percent of Hispanics, 18 percent of the elderly, and 18 percent of young people, 18-24, similarly had no photo ID. Finally, lower income people were at a 50 percent rate.

Challenges against the new voting laws have erupted in virtually every state, and in numerous federal courts. In 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of an Indiana law requiring a photo ID. But five years later, Judge Richard Posner, who wrote the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding that law, recanted, claiming that the Indiana law was "a type of law now widely regarded as a means of voter suppression rather than of fraud prevention." Posner pleaded "one wasn't alert to this kind of trickery, even though it's age old in the democratic process." Quite a reversal by so prominent a jurist.

Posner went on to claim that judges simply did not have enough facts at their disposal. They had no indications that "requiring additional voter identification would actually disenfranchise people entitled to vote." He credited his dissenting colleague, Judge Terence T. Evans, for being absolutely right. At the outset of his opinion, Judge Evans said: "Let's not beat around the bush: The Indiana voter photo ID law is a not-too-thinly-veiled attempt to discourage election-day turnout by certain folks believed to skew Democratic." There is every possibility that Posner will get another bite of the apple if and when there is an appeal from a now-pending lower court case in his jurisdiction.

The Republicans' professed motivation to eliminate voter fraud has been unmasked as totally empty in virtually every case. The leading scholarly study by Lorraine C. Minnite, The Business of Voter Fraud (2010) concludes voter fraud allegations are "unsupported by evidence" and have "no basis in fact." The Wisconsin legislature had focused attention on in-person voter impersonation fraud, but Dr. Minnite found only one such case where a husband voted his wife's absentee ballot after she died. Dr. Minnite concluded that other types of voter fraud were so rare that their incidence is "statistically zero."

A stopped clock is right twice a day. Alas! There is voter fraud in Wisconsin, but not from African-American or Hispanic voters -- and Democrats are in no way involved. A Republican operative, Marcie R. Malszycki, a legislative aide to Representative Warren Petryk, a Republican from West Central Wisconsin, has been charged with two counts of election fraud for allegedly voting in Petryk's district while she is a home owner in Madison. The felony charge carries up to 3.5 years of a combined prison term and extended supervision. The alleged fraud occurred in 2008 and 2010, while she was on unpaid leave from her legislative job, to work on political campaigns. The state's Government Accountability Board has said that under state law a person who moves for a temporary purpose is not eligible to vote in their temporary domicile.
Ms. Malszycki's guilt is apparent, but the District Attorney decided to let her off easily and dismissed one count and allowed for "deferred prosecution" on the other. In days of unbounded social media, Ms. Malszycki posted her votes in her temporary home on her Facebook page. At least she cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment to plead her right to refuse self incrimination. "Voter fraud" is alive and well in Wisconsin, ironically committed by a Republican.


Stanley Kutler has written a forthcoming play, "I, Nixon," and collaborated on "Nixon's the One," with Harry Shearer for English television, soon to be seen in the United States.

Go To Homepage

Popular in the Community