The Worst Political Endorsement by a Serious Newspaper in My Lifetime

As a Colorado citizen who pays more than ordinary attention to American politics generally and to Colorado politics particularly, I am dumbfounded and appalled byendorsement of Congressman Cory Gardner.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
DENVER, CO - October 7: U.S. Representative Cory Gardner talks about the voting habits of Senator Mark Udall during a debate Tuesday, October 7, 2014 in the auditorium of The Denver Post in Denver, Colorado. The debate is one of the final meeting of Senator Mark Udall and challenger U.S. Representative Cory Gardner, who are polling very closely with one another. (Photo By Brent Lewis/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
DENVER, CO - October 7: U.S. Representative Cory Gardner talks about the voting habits of Senator Mark Udall during a debate Tuesday, October 7, 2014 in the auditorium of The Denver Post in Denver, Colorado. The debate is one of the final meeting of Senator Mark Udall and challenger U.S. Representative Cory Gardner, who are polling very closely with one another. (Photo By Brent Lewis/The Denver Post via Getty Images)

Mr. Gregory Moore
Editor, The Denver Post
Denver, Colorado

Dear Mr. Moore:

Your editorial board's decision to endorse Congressman Cory Gardner for the United States Senate ranks as one of the worst endorsement decisions, not only by the Denver Post but by any serious newspaper, in my lifetime.

As a Colorado citizen who pays more than ordinary attention to American politics generally and to Colorado politics particularly, I am dumbfounded and appalled by your endorsement. Colorado quite possibly has the two best Senators in the United States and you choose to dismiss one of them. It is flatly false to say that Senator Udall is not a leader or that he is not at the center of major debates. It is much more accurate to say that he is not a self-promoter, which seems to have become the coin of the political realm.

I know for an absolute fact that he is at or near the center of virtually all serious national security, energy, environment, and economic debate currently occurring. I know for a fact that he is widely respected as a serious legislator by Senators of both parties. I cannot imagine from what sources you are deriving your information, but it is clearly not other United States Senators or anyone with a clear picture of what is going on in our nation's Capitol. You have chosen to support a conventional partisan over a serious legislator concerned with the national interest.

For you to conclude that Mr. Gardner will be anything other than a consistent vote for a Tea Party dictated agenda on the major social and economic issues of the day is confounding. Simply because one source called him a "rising star" does not qualify him for Senate membership. I had the privilege of serving with serious Senators of both parties. Mr. Gardner has a very long way to go before even coming close to their standard of statesmanship. Senator Udall, from a distinguished public service family whom I have known and with whom I have served, has the gravitas concerning the future of our nation that a partisan such as Mr. Gardner will never have in his lifetime.

I will leave it to my wife to decide whether to continue her subscription to the Post. I have lost confidence in the seriousness of your editorial judgment.

Sincerely,

Gary Hart
Kittredge, Colorado

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot