Trump Administration Restricts Access To Immigration Detention Facilities

Recent visitation denials have advocates concerned that this is just the beginning of further restrictions.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

President Trump’s new travel ban will go into effect tomorrow, and his Administration already has begun to discourage access to immigration detention facilities.

Today, Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC) filed a federal civil rights complaint detailing detention access denials and restrictions at 14 immigration detention facilities in Arizona, California, Virginia, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Over 440 organizations and immigration advocates, including the NAACP, the ACLU, Human Rights Watch, and Southern Poverty Law Center, have signed on to CIVIC’s letter advocating for continued access to immigration detention facilities.

Trump’s first attempt at a travel ban resulted in detentions at airports, where officials barred travelers from getting legal help. While most travelers were not transported to one of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s 211 dedicated immigration detention facilities, the Trump Administration holds 42,000 people in immigration detention every day. This includes asylum seekers fleeing persecution from all over the world, including the six countries identified in Trump’s recent travel ban.

While in immigration detention, people are isolated from the outside world. Only about 16 percent of people in immigration detention are represented by an attorney. And many are held in remote facilities run by private prison corporations, such as the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, and the Adelanto Detention Facility in the Mojave Desert of California. In the past, attorneys, community members, family members, and even a Congressional representative have been barred from accessing adult and youth immigration detention facilities.

“Ensuring that immigration detention facilities are held accountable requires that the public and our elected officials continue to have access to them.”

In September 2011, ICE took a step toward increased government transparency by creating the Stakeholder Access Directive. The Directive provides access to detention facilities for organizations that request to tour a facility and speak with individuals in immigration detention. The Stakeholder Access Directive has been incorporated into federal standards and is an additional form of access to traditional family and community visitation.

Ensuring that immigration detention facilities are held accountable requires that the public and our elected officials continue to have access to them. However, recent visitation denials and restrictions have advocates concerned that this is just the beginning of further restrictions to public access to immigration detention facilities.

Last month, ICE’s Field Office in Washington, D.C., denied a stakeholder tour and visitation of the Farmville Detention Center in Virginia. The local community groups requesting the tour were hoping to start a visitation program to provide people detained at Farmville with a consistent connection to the outside world. In denying the stakeholder tour, an Assistant ICE Field Office Director cited Trump’s Executive Orders, explaining that ICE is “undergoing significant operational changes and is in the process of reviewing all ongoing programs.”

The practice of denying the public access to immigration detention facilities did not start with Trump, but it has worsened in recent months. Since Trump’s election, community groups have been denied tours or temporarily suspended from visiting six separate immigration detention facilities, including the Theo Lacy Facility that last week was cited by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General for serious health and safety violations.

Rescinding or narrowing the Stakeholder Access Directive would mark a significant step backward in government transparency and accountability to the people. We urge ICE to uphold its Stakeholder Access Directive and to ensure that family and community members are not faced with additional restrictions when visiting people in immigration detention.

Before You Go

LOADINGERROR LOADING

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot