POLITICS

Trump Says The Census Is Pointless Without A Citizenship Question. That's A Lie.

The data gathered in the decennial census has a wide variety of essential uses that have nothing to do with citizenship.

President Donald Trump tweeted Monday that the 2020 decennial census would be “meaningless” and “a waste” if it doesn’t contain a question asking people whether they are U.S. citizens.

The Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question has been met with widespread criticism from advocacy groups and Census Bureau experts. They say the question will cause fewer people ― particularly immigrants and people of color ― to respond to the survey, which every 10 years attempts to count every living person in the United States.

An undercount would have lasting and severe consequences. The census is used to determine how electoral districts are drawn and to help determine how $880 billion in federal funds are allocated each year. Trump’s Monday tweet marks exactly one year until census day, and many groups are already trying to drum up enthusiasm about the decennial count and educate people about the importance of responding.

Data from the decennial census provides essential information to policymakers that has nothing to do with citizenship. State and local governments use the data for planning and businesses use it to make decisions, said John Thompson, who served as director of the Census Bureau from 2013 to 2017. Almost every household survey uses data from the census as a benchmark to make sure their own samples are representative, Thompson said, and inaccurate U.S. Census data would lead to a chain reaction of distorted information for the next decade.

“Large companies, folks in the real estate business, in retail, they are using the intricacies of the population data to make decisions about where they’re going to site a business, if they’re going to open one at all, exactly where should it be to get the best bang for the buck for what they’re trying to do,” said Howard Fienberg, vice president for advocacy at the Insights Association, which represents the interests of the marketing research and data analytics industry. “It’s bread and butter for decision-making for the whole of the private sector in so many ways.”

While different Census Bureau surveys have asked a sample of Americans about citizenship, the decennial survey, which goes out to every American household, has not asked about citizenship status since 1950.

Terri Ann Lowenthal, a census consultant who formerly worked as staff director of the House Census and Population Subcommittee, noted that the Constitution requires the government to count all “persons.” It says nothing, she added, about only counting citizens.

“The president directly contradicts the constitutional mandate for the census, which is to count all people living in the United States regardless of immigration status or citizenship for the purpose of equal political representation,” Lowenthal said in an email. “By suggesting that the census must ask about citizenship to be worthwhile, the president is both making the Census Bureau’s job much harder and potentially sending the nation towards a constitutional crisis that would be triggered if the public loses confidence in the objectivity of the process.”

The Trump administration is pushing to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, but its argument for doing so has come
The Trump administration is pushing to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, but its argument for doing so has come under scrutiny.

A spokesperson for the Commerce Department declined to comment for this article, citing pending litigation before the Supreme Court. Steven Dillingham, the director of the Census Bureau, told NPR on Monday that the bureau has to be “totally objective” about the question.

Two federal judges have already blocked the Trump administration from adding a question about citizenship to the 2020 survey, saying the administration ran afoul of federal law during the decision-making process and that the question itself would violate the Constitution. The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case later this month.

The Trump administration initially said it was adding the citizenship question at the request of the Department of Justice so it could better enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Many were skeptical of that justification, because the decennial census has never asked about citizenship status during the time the law has been in place.

Documents made public as part of litigation over the citizenship question confirmed that suspicion. They showed that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Census Bureau, was interested in adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census long before the Justice Department requested that he do so. The documents also showed that the Justice Department only asked for a citizenship question after Ross asked them if they would make a request.

John Gore, a political appointee at the Justice Department who played a key role in requesting the citizenship question, struggled to explain in a sworn deposition how exactly the question would allow the department to better enforce the Voting Rights Act.

The Trump administration’s interest in adding a citizenship question may be linked to how redistricting is done. Emails made public as part of the litigation show that Ross talked with former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) about adding the question. In an email, Kobach said it was a problem that noncitizens are counted as part of the population for the purposes of drawing electoral districts.

Ross has downplayed Kobach’s influence on his decision to add the question.

“I have no control over what Kris Kobach or anyone else puts in an email to me,” Ross said during a congressional hearing on the citizenship question last month.

CONVERSATIONS