POLITICS

If Trump Is Winning, Why Aren't Congressional Republicans Losing Primaries?

In a year of supposed anger at the establishment, not a single congressional Republican has lost his or her primary.
A popular theory behind the rise of Donald Trump is that voters are disenchanted with Washington and want an outsider. But th
A popular theory behind the rise of Donald Trump is that voters are disenchanted with Washington and want an outsider. But they keep re-electing their Republican Congress members. 

WASHINGTON -- Donald Trump is almost certain to be the Republican nominee, voters are calling for seismic changes to our political system, and not a single Republican member of Congress has lost a primary this year. Um, what?

There are plenty of theories on The Rise Of Trump -- some better than others -- but most explanations hinge on the extreme dissatisfaction voters have toward Washington and our current politics. In the Trump-is-a-hand-grenade scenario, voters chose the political neophyte in an effort to blow up government.

But if Republican voters are truly trying to make rubble of the Capitol, why are those same voters turning out to the polls and re-electing their members of Congress at every turn?

Ask Republican members of Congress, and they’ll do the verbal equivalent of scratching their heads.

“Oh! Great question!” Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa) excitedly told The Huffington Post. “I don’t have an answer to that.”

A number of Republicans thought it was a surprising contrast -- “I don’t get it,” Blum said -- and most Republicans agreed that there was considerable outrage among voters.

“I don’t think people are happy with Republicans,” Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) said.

But if voters aren’t happy, why aren’t they supporting disruptive challengers?

The most cogent Republican response seems to be that this goes back to “that adage,” in the words of Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), “people are upset with the way Congress works as a whole, but they like the individual."

That was a common explanation Republicans offered, in a butchering of the so-called “Fenno’s paradox,” named after political science Hall of Famer Richard Fenno and his seminal work, “If, as Ralph Nader Says, Congress is ‘the Broken Branch,’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen so Much?

Fenno noted that, when he visited congressional districts, constituents frequently told him their congressman was the best. That, coupled with incumbents winning re-election more than 90 percent of the time despite poor congressional approval ratings, led Fenno to observe a clear separation between how voters see Congress writ large and how they see their individual member of Congress.

Still, all the incumbent advantage aside, it seems odd that Trump could rise to power in some populist fit of rage while voters go out and re-elect their congressmen. 

“I don’t disagree,” said Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), a conservative House Freedom Caucus member who was one of the first lawmakers to endorse Trump. “Maybe that’s a little strange, but it’s been a strange election year.”

Except that, excusing Trump for a moment, maybe it’s not that weird.

The last time no Republican lost a primary was 2004, and there are five other times in the last 30 years where only one Republican lost in a primary.

On the Democratic side, this same dynamic is playing out. Voters who are feeling the Bern are still re-electing their Democratic representative. Only Chakka Fattah (D-Penn.), who’s mired in an ethics scandal, has lost his bid thus far.

And this Tuesday, the dynamic will become less noteworthy, as at least one incumbent Republican will lose their seat when Reps. George Holding and Renee Ellmers square off in North Carolina because of redistricting.

But isn’t it surprising if no true GOP challenger beats an incumbent this primary season, when roughly 20 million of 30 million Republican primary voters went for outsiders Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)?

Not really, political scientists say.

Robert Boatright, the author of Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges, told HuffPost that primary challengers are most often driven by outside groups. “I think the sorts of groups that have financed primary challenges in previous years are probably preoccupied with aiding Republican incumbents in states where Trump may be a drag on the ticket,” Boatright said.

“Trump basically has so dominated people’s attention this year that conservative groups haven’t really tried to mount any challenges,” he added.

In the highest-profile primary races -- like Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady’s race in north Houston, and the contest for Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Bill Shuster’s Pennsylvania seat -- both incumbents were able to raise massive sums of money to fend off their challengers, Steve Toth and Art Halvorson, respectively. (Halvorson may have a second chance to take down Shuster, after a preliminary vote count showed he might win the Democratic primary as a write-in candidate.)

Trump likes to tout all the new voters he's brought into the party, but the truth is these aren't new voters; they're just general election voters who are new to voting in primaries. In some ways, these voters are doing what they almost always do: re-elect their congressman.

It's true that congressional approval ratings are still in the toilet. The most recent Gallup poll in May showed that only 18 percent of respondents approve of the way Congress is handling its job. But those numbers are actually up from 11 percent in November, and they've been on a pretty steady rise this year. 

As Fenno pointed out decades ago, congressional approval ratings matter very little in re-election, particularly when voters clearly separate their member from Congress as a whole.

And for all the populist bluster out there, the unemployment rate is at 4.7 percent, gas prices are at a national average of $2.33, and only 13 percent of Americans "worry a great deal" that they or someone in their family will be a victim of terrorism.

Perhaps it's less notable that voters are re-electing their congressmen across the board, and more notable that they ever nominated Trump. 

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liarrampant xenophoberacistmisogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

CONVERSATIONS