I don't think any tweakings of the candidate or her message will work for Hillary, and not because Obama-mania is an occult force or a kind of mass hysteria.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

When did you begin to think that Obama might be unstoppable? Was it when your
grown feminist daughter started weeping inconsolably over his defeat in New
Hampshire? Or was it when he triumphed in Virginia, a state still littered with
Confederate monuments and memorabilia? For me, it was on Tuesday night when two
Republican Virginians in a row called C-SPAN radio to report that they'd just
voted for Ron Paul, but, in the general election, would vote for... Obama.

In the dominant campaign narrative, his appeal is mysterious and irrational:
He's a "rock star," all flash and no substance, tending dangerously, according
to the New York Times' Paul Krugman
, to a "cult of personality." At
best, he's seen as another vague Reagan-esque avatar of Hallmarkian sentiments
like optimism and hope. While Clinton, the designated valedictorian, reaches out
for the ego and super-ego, he supposedly goes for the id. She might as well be
promoting choral singing in the face of Beatlemania.

The Clinton coterie is wringing its hands. Should she transform herself into
an economic populist, as Paul Begala pleaded on Tuesday night? This would be a
stretch, given her technocratic and elitist approach to health reform in 1993,
her embarrassing vote for a credit card company-supported bankruptcy bill in
2001, among numerous other lapses. Besides, Obama already just leaped out in
front of her with a resoundingly populist economic program on Wednesday.

Or should she reconfigure herself, untangle her triangulations, and attempt
to appeal to the American people in some deep human way, with or without a tear
or two? This, too, would take heavy lifting. Someone needs to tell her that
there are better ways to signal conviction than by raising one's voice and
drawing out the vowels, as in "I KNOW ..." and "I BELIEVE ..." The
frozen smile has to go too, along with the metronymic nodding, which sometimes
goes on long enough to suggest a placement within the autism spectrum.

But I don't think any tweakings of the candidate or her message will work,
and not because Obama-mania is an occult force or a kind of mass hysteria. Let's
take seriously what he offers, which is "change." The promise of "change" is
what drives the Obama juggernaut, and "change" means wanting out of wherever you
are now. It can even mean wanting out so badly that you don't much care, as in
the case of the Ron Paul voters cited above, exactly what that change will be.
In reality, there's no mystery about the direction in which Obama might take us:
He's written a breathtakingly honest autobiography; he has a long legislative
history, and now, a meaty economic program. But no one checks the weather before
leaping out of a burning building.

Consider our present situation. Thanks to Iraq and water-boarding, Abu Ghraib
and the "rendering" of terror suspects, we've achieved the moral status of a
pariah nation. The seas are rising. The dollar is sinking. A growing proportion
of Americans have no access to health care; an estimated 18,000 die every year
for lack of health insurance. Now, as the economy staggers into recession, the
financial analysts are wondering only whether the rest of the world is
sufficiently "de-coupled" from the US economy to survive our demise.

Clinton can put forth all the policy proposals she likes - and many of them
are admirable ones - but anyone can see that she's of the same generation and
even one of the same families that got us into this checkmate situation in the
first place. True, some people miss Bill, although the nostalgia was severely
undercut by his anti-Obama rhetoric in South Carolina, or maybe they just miss
the internet bubble he happened to preside over. But even more people find
dynastic successions distasteful, especially when it's a dynasty that produced
so little by way of concrete improvements in our lives. Whatever she does, the
semiotics of her campaign boils down to two words - "same old."

Obama is different, really different, and that in itself represents "change."
A Kenyan-Kansan with roots in Indonesia and multiracial Hawaii, he
seems to be the perfect answer to the bumper sticker that says, "I love you
America, but isn't it time to start seeing other people?" As conservative
commentator Andrew Sullivan has written, Obama's election could mean the
re-branding of America. An anti-war black president with an Arab-sounding name:
See, we're not so bad after all, world!

So yes, there's a powerful emotional component to Obama-mania, and not just
because he's a far more inspiring speaker than his rival. We, perhaps white
people especially, look to him for atonement and redemption. All of us, of
whatever race, want a fresh start. That's what "change" means right now: Get
us out of here!

Go To Homepage

Popular in the Community