How the U.S. and China Can Join Forces to Fight the Common Enemy -- Climate Change

BEIJING -- The climate change negotiations have reached the most critical time. After Xi's visit to the U.S., there's a little over 10 weeks until the UN climate conference in Paris.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Chemical factory with smoke stack
Chemical factory with smoke stack
china focus

BEIJING -- In just over 20 days after celebrating, in different ways, their 70th anniversary of victories in WWII, President Xi will meet President Obama in Washington for his first state visit to the U.S. as Chinese president. Unlike 70 years ago, the common enemy the two countries face this time is no longer Japanese militarism, but instead, economic uncertainty and climate change.

This is the third formal meeting between Xi and Obama, and it is likely to be the last. The first one was in June 2013, the "private" meeting held in at the Sunnylands, California. The two reached an agreement to build the "Sino-U.S. new type of major power relationship," and together with the development of their personal relationships, provided an impetus to build mutual trust and set a clear strategic direction for Sino-U.S. relations.

obama xi apec

Presidents Obama and Xi reach out to shake hands following a bilateral meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 12, 2014. MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images.

The second was in November 2014 during the Beijing APEC summit, when President Obama made a state visit to China. The outcome was very successful, including the "U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change," a landmark moment after years of international climate change negotiations, bringing a bright prospect to the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris at the end of 2015.

For the third meeting between President Xi and Obama, both countries and the international community have good reason to have high expectations.

However, this meeting is also taking place at a time with more difficulties and complications. Since 2015, Sino-U.S. differences on a range of issues have deteriorated. Although some progress was still made in June during the 7th round of Strategic Economic Dialogue, inevitably hot-button issues negatively affected the bilateral relations.

World Economy in Flux

Yet a series of recent fluctuations in the Chinese and the world economy reminded everyone of the necessity for the two countries to cooperate. The Shanghai A-share index has fallen about 40 percent from the high point in June. Prices of mass commodities, including crude oil, experienced another sharp fall after an unexpected devaluation of the Chinese renminbi in August, followed by disruption in European and American stock markets.

Weak demand from China also dampened the expectations of oil prices, adding threat to the U.S. shale boom, which it has based its economic recovery upon. The road to transitioning the Chinese economy to a "new normal" is anything but flat, and the expectation of the Fed raising rates has complicated overall implications on the world economy, especially for the emerging economies. Economic decision-making in the world's two largest economies in the coming months may have decisive impacts on the world economy as it approaches 2020. Reaching a coordinated and common understanding of respective economic policies at the third meeting between presidents Xi and Obama will have immense importance in stabilizing the world economy.

Critical Moment for Climate Change

The climate change negotiations have also reached the most critical time. After Xi's visit to the U.S., there's just over 10 weeks before the UN climate conference in Paris. Whether Xi and Obama could bring further consensus and cooperation between the two largest emitters is also a question warmly expected by international community.

Ironically, the world now faces a similar economic difficulty as before Copenhagen in 2009, only the U.S. and China have switched positions. Back in 2009, the Chinese economy outperformed the rest of the world under the 4 trillion yuan stimulus package, while the U.S. and Europe were struggling in financial turmoil. The 2008 economic crisis was regarded as one of the reasons for the failure in Copenhagen 2009. Now the Chinese economy is a real concern to many with worrying indicators in industry and energy demand, whereas the U.S. economy is on track for strong recovery partly driven by the shale oil and gas boom, with employment rate better than expected. Could there be a different outcome to 2009 due to this role reversal?

The Chinese government needs to make hard choices in the second half of 2015. Is it to go back to the old path of heavy industrialization and investment to stimulate the economy, or insist on restructuring, implementing the long awaited reform in production factor pricing and state-owned monopoly enterprises? The former means greater environmental risk, possibly making the early conservation efforts in vain, while the latter means enduring greater pain in economy in the short term. Given the scale of the Chinese economy and environmental impacts, either choice would have global implications. However, environment conversations and economic development are not necessarily an either-or choice. Good investment can also drive good economic transitions.

If the Chinese government could make better use of market mechanisms to control pollution, providing a supportive environment for clean energy and environment technologies, China's environmental protection efforts and carbon reduction targets could turn into huge economic opportunities.

The Chinese economy is a real concern to many with worrying indicators in industry and energy demand, whereas the U.S. economy is on track for strong recovery partly driven by the shale oil and gas boom.

It is estimated that the total environmental investment needed during the "Thirteenth Five Plan" in China is expected to be more than 1 trillion U.S. dollars, while the Chinese government can only provide 15 percent of the funds. The United States can use their own experience and technology to help China to achieve this goal, while bringing greater market opportunities for their own business.

Investment and technical cooperation in key areas have been identified and agreed by both governments in the latest SED, including heavy-load truck fuel standards, electric vehicles, shale gas, industrial boiler efficiency, and smart grids. The Chinese government hopes to promote public-private partnership projects in these areas as primary means of stabilizing economic growth, but inadequacy in protecting private investment and poor coordination in project management between private and public partners are still prevailing barriers. The Chinese government could learn from U.S. experience in effectively utilizing market forces to guide and encourage private investment towards these areas.

China also needs to deepen the reform in the energy sector. Since the Third Plenum of the Eighteenth Party Congress, President Xi has repeatedly pledged to carry out reform in monopolizing state owned enterprise, and to let the market be the decisive power in allocation of resources. Progress was made in the past two years, but only slowly. If China wishes to replicate the shale boom of U.S., it needs to break down the restrictions of access to oil and gas resources, to establish a vibrant oil and gas trading system, while continuing to push for reforms in oil, gas and power markets.

As a cleaner fossil energy, natural gas can make contributions to both environmental protection and economic prosperity, but the main obstacle is not price nor supply, but the market and trade restrictions, as well as distorted pricing of alternative energy. It is evident that with adequate supply and declining prices in the first half of 2015, growth of natural gas demand fell from 8.9 percent in 2014 to 1.4 percent. The national carbon trading market that China plans to establish in 2016 would help to partially alleviate this distortion, but the most important thing is promote the much needed reform of in the power sector.

Energy security, especially oil and gas supply security has always been one of the major concerns of the Chinese government.

Energy security, especially oil and gas supply security has always been one of the major concerns of the Chinese government. This also to some extent explains the Chinese firm stance on the issue of South China Sea. With clearer prospects of the U.S. exporting to the Asia-Pacific market, China and the U.S. would have common interests in safeguarding oil and gas supply security in this region. Even though oil is not mentioned in the "U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change," coordinating the two countries' oil policies, including in the evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions, unconventional oils and managing the consumption of its by-product of petroleum coke, requires institutionalizing cooperation and communication between the United States and China. This would ease Chinese concerns on energy security, contributing to the two countries' common target on climate change and encourage China's participation in international energy governance.

Collaboration on clean technology, energy sector reform and energy security could provide new impetus to China's economic transition, but also provide more support for the U.S. economic recovery, and at the same time contribute to the stability of the world's economy and efforts in tackling climate change.

Professor Yan Xuetong, president of management board of the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy commented in July 2013 that, "providing public good to the international community is the foothold for a healthy competition between China and the United States." Seventy years ago, China and the U.S. fought side by side during the anti-fascist war, but confined by different battlegrounds, direct cooperation was limited. Seventy years later, facing economic uncertainty and climate change that put the world's prosperity and sustainability at great peril, the United States and China have to work much closer to provide the much needed public good for the world.

This should be the essence of "Sino-U.S. new type of major power relationship," and the most anticipated outcome of the third meeting between Xi and Obama.

Earlier on WorldPost:

Pollution In China

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot