Virginia Law Says Student Groups Can Discriminate, Still Get Funding

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell speaks to the press in front of a statue of George Washington at the Capitol Tuesday, Feb. 5, 201
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell speaks to the press in front of a statue of George Washington at the Capitol Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013 in Richmond, Va. McDonnell called for a yes vote on his transportation bill. The House approved the legislation. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Student groups at Virginia colleges can still collect college funding even if they are not all-inclusive, after Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) signed the Student Group Protection Act into law Friday.

Under the new law, Virginia colleges cannot withhold funds from religious or political student groups that don't accept certain members based on religion, sexual orientation or personal beliefs. For example, a student group could exclude lesbian students by citing religious beliefs or require that all members are of a certain faith, but it would still be eligible for college funding.

"We think that under the bill as it’s crafted, the university would have to fund a white supremacist organization," Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, executive director of the ACLU of Virginia, told the Commonwealth Times.

"It would have to fund an organization like the Christian Legal Society that doesn’t admit gay students," Gastañaga said. "An organization that said, 'we don’t admit gay people' would be able to come to the student body and say, 'we have a right to student fees like everybody else. You have to give us student fees.'"

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education applauded McDonnell and state Sen. Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg), who authored the law, for their work.

"Guaranteeing those groups the right to hold their leaders to belief-based standards is a vital part of ensuring that a pluralistic and diverse culture can exist on campus," FIRE president Greg Lukianoff said in a statement.

Obenshain said the legislation was needed to protect religious groups and to prevent pranksters from wreaking havoc on student political groups with hostile takeovers.

"It's pretty simple: A Democratic club shouldn't have to accept a Republican as a member and members of a religious group should be able to expect that their leadership will share the group's core commitments," Obenshain said in a release. "It's perfectly reasonable for an organization to expect its members to agree with, and be good examples of, the organization's mission."

A 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, confirmed that requiring student groups to adopt "all-comers" policies does not violate First Amendment rights. Groups like FIRE remain critical of the high court's ruling.

The bill passed in the state Legislature mostly along party lines, except for a handful of Democrats who joined Republicans in favor of it.

"Here's the problem: In a democratic republic, a lot of the rules exist to protect the minority,” state Sen. Creigh Deeds (D-Charlottesville) told the Cavalier Daily. "And this bill basically says, 'it's alright to discriminate against the minority, however that may be.'"

The Richmond Times Dispatch wrote an editorial opposing the bill, and the ACLU of Virginia urged McDonnell to veto it.

Similar requirements have become a source of tension at schools like Vanderbilt University, leading to a bill in the Tennessee legislature similar to Virginia's new law.

Virginia becomes the second state, along with Ohio, to adopt such a law. Tennessee and Idaho are also considering their own versions.



The Colleges With The Most Religious Students (Princeton Review 2011)