Zimbabwe and its neighbor South Africa are startling contrasts in how racial relations are managed after the end of rule by the whites. In case of South Africa, there was more of healing lead by Mandela. In case of Zimbabwe it more of falling off a cliff. Both Mugabe and Mandela spent a lot of time in prison.
Zimbabwe's economy collapse is from a) one of the worst dictators in the region leading an extraordinarily corrupt regime, b) a terrible land distribution program that has demolished food production c) HIV/AIDS ripping through the region d) Second Congo War & Mugabe's involvement there e) US sanctions to curtail Mugabe's regime and f) the regime's desperate efforts to pull itself out of all this through printing money.
Since its independence in 1980, Zimbabwe has been ruled by a single leader - Robert Mugabe. He ruthlessly eliminate any opposition in his ZANU party and elsewhere. Over the past 35 years, it was practically a single man rule who does everything to keep himself in power. The country is among the world's top 20 most corrupted nations and a person trying to stay in power printed as much money as possible to survive himself.
In the 1990s he instituted land reforms to take away land from the white landowners to distribute it to the blacks. Some of these new farmers had no experience in farming and thus food production dropped by nearly half. Around the same decade, HIV/AIDS became a major threat ripping apart Zimbabwe and many other African countries.
Since 1998, he involved his country in the[the African World War] further impoverishing the country.
In reaction to all this, US and Europe have imposed sanctions in early 2000s against the ruling elite & the farms connected to them. These sanctions were the last straw in the already struggle Zimbabwe economy. 89,700,000,000,000,000,00
This question originally appeared on Quora. - the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights. You can follow Quora on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. More questions: