Washington political news outlet The Hill reports on the recent "professional left" remarks made by the Obama White House's press secretary Robert Gibbs. Gibbs was expressing frustration at progressive activists who are complaining that the president hasn't lived up to campaign promises on a number of issues.
The press secretary dismissed the "professional left" in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, "They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we've eliminated the Pentagon. That's not reality."
"I hear these people saying he's like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested," Gibbs said. "I mean, it's crazy."
I don't disagree that comparing Obama to Bush is crazy; Bush could push the exact bill he wanted through Congress and Obama can pronounce "nuclear". It's the "drug users are crazy" slur, the "drug test" variant of the "what have you been smoking?" that offends me. It's that joking about these drug tests that ruin thousands of lives is a response from an official addressing the disappointment in the president felt by the people who voted for him. Considering the vast majority of people who use "drugs" are using cannabis and the tests for "drugs" most often find cannabis metabolites, he's talking about us, the 22 million* Americans who will use cannabis this year.
Full disclosure: I am one of the "professional left"** and attended that Netroots Nation conference Gibbs is obliquely referencing, representing NORML on a marijuana policy panel.
But NORML is a non-partisan organization, just as arresting marijuana consumers is a bi-partisan shame (4.9 million under Clinton, 6.2 million under Bush, but Clinton's overall increase in the annual rate was +90% from beginning to end of his term while Bush's was +17% between 2001 and 2008; we still await the 2009 final year arrest numbers which chronicle the marijuana arrests from the year before... think of the graph as "arrests up to 2009", not "arrests up to and including 2009".)
Gibbs said the professional left is not representative of the progressives who organized, campaigned, raised money and ultimately voted for Obama.
Well, we know what President Obama and Robert Gibbs think of those of us who "ought to be drug tested", especially us online activists in the "professional left" who helped get him elected. We're chuckled at when we suggest legalizing marijuana (see videos below), even as more than half of America on some polls - not just Left Blogsylvania - are beginning to think it is a damn good idea and California is voting on the issue this November.
Legalization is more popular than the Congress and the President - who once, like us, was just one bust away from being "Barry the Drug Criminal" for life - so maybe equating our criticisms of the president to drug-induced psychosis isn't the smartest political move.
This is not to ignore the millions of cannabis consumers who find themselves on the right side of the aisle, the Libertarians and true small government, personal responsibility, states rights Republicans, who we count as our ideological allies in ending adult marijuana prohibition. There are 102 million of us who've tried cannabis, including the last three presidents and eight of fifteen of the last major party candidates for president and vice president.*** Right now, our issue is the only thing on which members of the Tea Party and the Netroots Nation can agree on. Somebody is going to get wise and start courting our votes.
* Remember these are numbers from a government-sponsored survey where an anonymous pollster surveys random strangers by telephone to ask whether they currently are violating state and federal law... so you might want to adjust upward a bit. For comparison's sake, there are more adults in America who will smoke pot this year than there are adult African-Americans in this country.
** And yes, I would be satisfied with Canadian health care, thank you very much! My insurance premiums went up 24% this year!
*** The admitted / strongly suspected (Danforth, we're looking your way...) marijuana users are italicized:
1992 Clinton / Gore vs. Bush / Quayle
1996 Clinton / Gore vs. Dole / Kemp
2000 Bush / Cheney vs. Gore / Lieberman
2004 Bush / Cheney vs. Kerry / Edwards
2008 Obama / Biden vs. McCain / Palin
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your contribution of as little as $2 will go a long way.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
