Will the Next Katrina Be a Nuclear Attack?

Will the next Katrina be a terrorist strike with nuclear materials?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

In the new American lexicon, "Katrina" will be defined as follows:

KATRINA (noun; slang, U.S.) -- ka-tri–na: A foreseeable disaster or tragedy that is not prevented, or is made worse, by government cronies in powerful positions -- one where said cronies then profit in the aftermath

Will the next Katrina be a terrorist strike with nuclear materials? Consider this eye-catching sentence: "Some radiological waste storage areas may lack adequate protection against sabotage which could cause wide-area radiological dispersal." Or this one: The "US Defense Department failed to secure sources of radiological material in Iraq for six months after the US invasion in 2003, during which period some were looted or scattered, a congressional watchdog said." Or this one: "An unknown number of radiologic sources remain unsecured in Iraq."

Many terrorism experts believe a radiological or "dirty bomb" attack is likely -- but why make it so easy? Like the pre-Katrina FEMA, it's a tale of cronies in high places, greedy contracting, and plain old-fashioned incompetence. It turns out that the "MBA President" of press lore probably couldn't cut it as CEO of a barbershop quartet, much less a nation.

If and when that "Nuclear Katrina" hits, you won't have to worry about the "cronies," though. They'll profit off the clean-up and reconstruction contracts, just as they've been doing in Iraq and the Gulf Coast. In fact, Halliburton's already hiring Radiation Safety Officers! And Rove's directing the hurricane clean-up, which goes to show: When it comes the post-nuclear family that is Bush cronyism, blood is thicker than water.

Popular in the Community