State Sen. Laura Woods continues to differentiate herself from Colorado Republicans, like U.S. Senator Cory Gardner and Rep. Mike Coffman, who've tried to disavow their extreme anti-choice records--or dodge questions about abortion.
Woods, on the other hand, has embraced a personhood abortion ban, with no exceptions for rape and incest, throughout her political career.
Last week, for example, Woods shared a video on Facebook from LiveAction, a anti-choice group.
It shows a woman who's asked the question, "Do you support aborting the child if it was a case of incest?" (at 2:55 here)
"Yeah," she replies.
Then the woman is pictured watching a video of an abortion, which convinces her that abortion should not be allowed in cases of incest.
Woods does not return my calls, so I can't talk to her why likes the video or whether she thinks her no-compromise stance against abortion, even for incest, will help her hold back a challenge from pro-choice Democrat Rachel Zenzinger in November.
Today, the stakes are higher than ever. Woods' district will likely determine control of Colorado state government, and Woods isn't doing the Buckpedal--or whatever you want to call the dance senatorial candidate Ken Buck, Gardner and Coffman have performed as they tried to distance themselves from right-wing positions they'd taken during their careers.
Woods, a Republican from Westminster/Arvada, isn't trying to hide her opposition to all abortion, even for incest, even though political observers say it will hurt her in November.
Judging from interviews, it appears that Woods thinks she need not take middle-of-the-road positions to win in her swingiest of swing districts, where she won by 650 votes in the Republican wave year of 2014. She's vowed to stand by her conservative principles.
You could call this a form of political chest thumping. But no abortion, even for rape and incest? Will it work for Westminster/Arvada?