Science communication

Sharing evidence won't convince them.
As we watch Donald Trump take on the most powerful position in the world, many of us are left asking how a man who has consistently lied to his public could get so far.
Poster presentations and conference talks are also good opportunities to practice, and will train you to communicate science
You look down from the sky, manipulating the world and seeing how it responds to your changes. You are able to alter vegetation
Academia is supposed to foster innovation, free-thinking, and novel, impactful ideas. But if all of that happens in the Ivory Tower, what's the point?
Dr. Venter is a biology guru. Not only his team, together with the US government, was the first to sequence the human genome, but (in 2010) they had managed to create what had been called the first synthetic life form.
Without a new generation of scientists who can communicate clearly to the public and to other scientists, we are going to be in for some difficult times ahead in which our progress as a nation will be hindered.
We have worked with scientists for 15 years, and we've noticed some common mistakes scientists make when they communicate. Here are the top four, and what scientists can do to fix them.
One may confidently presume that the experts at any such conference would opine at some length, offering insights about different
In this presidential election season, one thing is certain: candidates will rarely - if ever - be asked what they would do to keep this nation at the forefront of science and innovation. That's a shame.
When scientists invite us into their world, paying attention to our needs the way good hosts do for their guests, they enlarge our lives.
The challenge in making science communication open and accessible lies in funding the distribution of these materials. Without institutional backing for such innovative projects, it will be entrepreneurial spirits in the likes of somersault 18:24 that will pioneer the revolution in science communication.
Societies for science still only accept well-established scientists who pay large membership dues. Journals of science are still only distributed to and read by paying subscribers: research institutions and rich scientists. Science communication is outdated.
"When I was 11 years old, I asked a teacher what's going on in a flame," he said in a recent interview with David Freeman
Like my son, many of us seem to think one way about the environment and feel another. That is, we think safeguarding the environment is important but we often feel alienated by the way other people talk about it.
With more than 13 million "likes," I F---ing Love Science is the big winner among Facebook pages devoted to science and science communicators. And it would probably be very popular even without the "F" bomb. Or would it?
Science is not a commercial thing. Science is a communal, cooperative enterprise in which information, knowledge, data, and ideas are shared openly and broadly. Any entity that puts commercial interests ahead of this shared enterprise, such as Elsevier, needs to get its priorities straight.
We were looking for someone who might be the next Carl Sagan. Tyson is such a person.
What the world needs is a great communicator of science who can connect with large audiences, liberal, moderate and conservative, to help explain what science is, and the wonders it reveals about nature and the nature of the universe. So do we have one?