Senate confirmation

The GOP senator's stance could imperil both nominations in what is expected to be a heated confirmation process.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer argued that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gosuch would not be independent, would be too ideological, and has favored corporations over people.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer argued that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gosuch would not be independent, would be too ideological, and has favored corporations over people.
A Tough Job I'm hopeful that Botel can help the president understand the real challenges facing public education and the
Although, as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, I do not get to ask Senator Jeff Sessions questions during his confirmation hearing (the Senate has that duty), I have been thinking a lot about what I would ask, and what I encourage Senators to ask with what is at stake.
Congressman Goodlatte, if there's one thing people can count on you for, it's that you will put your party's interests ahead of the good of the nation. Fortunately, there's something you can do now to redeem yourself.
Grassley should simply follow his own admonition from more than a decade ago, come back to Washington, tell his Republican colleagues "let's do our jobs," and get to work confirming Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.
John King has the makings of another Arne Duncan, and on some points (e.g., ESSA Title I state plans), Sen. Lamar Alexander will want to use the Senate to rein King in. However, on other points (e.g., reckless charter spending; pressuring states to deliver on that 95 percent of test takers), King and Alexander will get on just fine.
For Asian Americans, as for other immigrant groups before them, there will be opportunity, but only if we continue to insist on our stake in the nation. We are equals. We deserve to be included.
Much is at stake in this battle the Republicans have forced upon the nation. It is a battle that must be fought and won, and one that is the president's job, above all, to lead.
Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee announced that they will not consider any nominee put forward by our nation's president. This is unconscionable. If they carry through on this threat, it will be directly incompatible with their solemn responsibilities under the U.S. Constitution.
Let's see where this argument leads. If they are arguing that the president should not submit a nomination in the last year of the presidential term, that restriction should apply ALSO to the first presidential term.
The unexpected death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the resulting Supreme Court vacancy has rattled a political system already destabilized by what is shaping up to be a bizarre political campaign.
Democrats cite this latest controversy as another example of Congress deliberately "obstructing" the President, implying
Only three candidates are willing to say that the system is corrupt: Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, and Lawrence Lessig. But Trump has no solution to the problem, while the other two do.
Let's make campaign finance reform the question candidates cannot escape. Let's move from grumbling at meetings and Tweeting about fresh outrages. Instead, every citizen, journalist, researcher and pollster can repeatedly ask candidates how they plan to make the institutions they hope to serve in stronger.
The new talking point for the Republican Party -- actually, it's an old talking point in expensive new clothing -- is "America is in retreat."
The invocation of the nuclear option last November addressed a real problem with the functioning of the Senate, paved the way for a new generation of insightful legal minds to join the ranks of the federal judiciary, and has allowed the president to address the nation's judicial vacancy crisis by accelerating the pace of confirmations. We are all better off for it.
The former mayor of Newark, N.J., and a sitting United States senator, has an academic background and relevant experience for the job. He is a Democrat, but not a fire-breathing partisan.