After I've had an opportunity to reflect more calmly and carefully on the implications of the forthcoming Trump presidency for environmental, natural resource, and energy policy, I will return to this topic.
California can play a very important role by showing leadership -- in two key ways. One is to demonstrate a commitment to meaningful reductions in GHG emissions. In this regard, California has more than met the bar, with policies that are as aggressive as -- if not more aggressive than -- those of most countries.
There are a substantial number of issues that negotiators will eventually need to address, and likewise, there are a set of questions that researchers (including within the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements) can begin to address now.
Stunning new photos capture the beauty and peril of sulfur mining.
Each wind turbine makes a big difference: a single turbine cuts 900 cars' worth of carbon dioxide emissions.
We don't have to wait any longer. The Supreme Court says yes to regulating cross-state air pollution.
Oil refiners can learn from Europe as they try to reduce accidents at plants in Louisiana and other states, U.S. safety experts say. After a string of disasters, President Obama issued an executive order last August to improve chemical facility safety.
WASHINGTON -- A World Bank-backed coal plant in South Africa is seeking to delay the implementation of pollution controls
Then, Lawrence Goulder and I focus on an ingredient of benefit-cost analysis that non-economists seem to find particularly
Advertising could be considered an art of grand hyperbole, but are new car ads the latest brushstrokes on this fanciful canvas or truthful commentary on how far down the road car companies have come to lower pollution?