This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

End Of Life Is Experiencing Social And Legal Change Across Canada

There is no right answer regarding end of life care. Your personal choices will be interpreted within an increasingly volatile landscape of changing laws and changing interpretations of the laws alongside changes in our society's acceptance of end of life decision-making.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Open Image Modal
David Sacks via Getty Images
50s man sitting on hospital bed

By: Lee Anne Davies

The world of Alzheimer's disease continues to experience a great deal of changes, ranging from social mores to legislation. Not only are people under the age of 65 living with the disease due to early diagnosis, but a more demanding generation, the baby boomers, are aging into their greater health-risk years.

Care for Alzheimer's is increasingly patient-centric. Fortunately, well-informed and caring people are challenging health and social care organizations to reconsider their approaches to behaviours, adult day programs, facility living and much more in order to protect the rights and dignity of those living with Alzheimer's.

Some of this change is taking place due to the increasing voice of those people who have received a diagnosis of Alzheimer's and who are instrumental in reshaping our approach to this disease. Over the next few years there will be no greater area of change in Canada than in our social conscience and our legal frameworks regarding end of life care and decision-making. You need to be aware of the current challenges and planned changes.

British Columbia courts and Alzheimer's

Putting your wishes in writing and communicating them to professionals and family is the current gold standard for protecting your wishes. However, it is not without problems, and this is best demonstrated through the Bentley case in British Columbia.

This is an extremely complex situation involving an 83-year-old retired nurse, her family and the health authority. A brief overview of this situation indicates that several challenges by Mrs. Bentley's family to the provincial health authority have taken place over the right to stop feeding her, respecting her wishes to not live with extreme mental or physical disability.

Regardless of your point of view, this is a disturbing situation because of the difficulty in interpreting Mrs. Bentley's wishes, even though as an informed health care professional she stated her wishes. This demonstrates how woefully unprepared our country is for severe health situations that arise and that you must be vigilant in sharing your thoughts on your end of life wishes with as many people as is possible to help protect your plans.

The changing Canadian legal landscape

With the federal election out of the way and the one-year deadline looming, there will be a greater focus on physician assisted suicide. The Supreme Court ruling set a legalization date of Feb. 6, 2016 (unless an extension is requested) in order to undertake more consultation and analysis. Andre Picard's article in the Globe and Mail provides an update on our country's process discussing many of the challenges surrounding the implementation of assisted suicide legislation, including the rights of physicians versus the rights of patients.

Quebec has already passed their Respecting End of Life Care bill (to take effect in December 2015), but it is unclear on how the assessment of a person's competency to choose will be undertaken in Quebec. At this point in time clarity on assessment is an important and missing key piece of information for people with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's or related dementias.

End of life decision-making cannot ignore money and estates

Money adds another dimension to decision making about end of life. Money can be viewed as a motive -- at least in some people's eyes. This means that someone who may be a beneficiary of an estate needs to be clear and transparent about their involvement in any discussions regarding end-of-life decisions.

My article in the Financial Post delves into some estate scenarios on personal finances when facing these decisions and the potential for subtle financial elder abuse. You need to be aware of these issues to protect yourself but also to protect others who could be accused of some irregularity after you pass away.

How to move forward when there are so many unknowns

There is no right answer regarding end of life care. Your personal choices will be interpreted within an increasingly volatile landscape of changing laws and changing interpretations of the laws alongside changes in our society's acceptance of end of life decision-making. Finding others who share in your experience with Alzheimer's may be helpful in creating your own plan.

This blog by Kate Swaffer in Australia is worth reading. Ms. Swaffer advocates for Alzheimer's care while also managing her own diagnosis. Ultimately, it is up to you and your loved ones to remain informed about the latest news in Canada on end of life. For as long as is possible, your voice needs to be clear and constant in order to help others understand how to best honour your choices.

This story was originally published in the Alzheimer Society of Ontario's newsletter as well as on alzlive.com, a website for caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's and dementia.

Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook

MORE ON HUFFPOST:

Assisted Suicide Laws In Canada
Euthanasia In Canada(01 of07)
Open Image Modal
Here's a look at the state of Euthanasia laws in Canada and their history. (credit:Shutterstock)
Suicide Not A Crime(02 of07)
Open Image Modal
Suicide hasn't been a crime in Canada since 1972. (Shutterstock) (credit:Shutterstock)
Doctor-Assisted Suicide Illegal(03 of07)
Open Image Modal
Doctor-assisted suicide is illegal, although the ruling of the B.C. Supreme Court will force Parliament to alter the law within one year.

The Criminal Code of Canada states in section 241 that:

"Every one who (a) counsels a person to commit suicide, or (b) aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years." (Alamy)
(credit:Alamy)
Passive Euthanasia(04 of07)
Open Image Modal
Passive euthanasia involves letting a patient die instead of prolonging life with medical measures. Passive euthanasia is legal in Canada.

The decision is left in the hands of family or a designated proxy. Written wishes, including those found in living wills, do not have to be followed by family or a proxy. (Alamy)
(credit:Alamy)
Sue Rodriguez(05 of07)
Open Image Modal
Sue Rodriguez, who suffered from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease), launched a case asking the Supreme Court of Canada to allow her to end her own life on the grounds that the current law discriminated against her disability.

Because suicide is legal in Canada and Rodriguez was unable to end her life because of a lack of mobility, she argued it was discriminatory to prevent her from ending her own life with the aid of another.

The court refused her request in 1993, but one year later she ended her life anyway with the help of an unnamed doctor. (CP)
(credit:CP)
Robert Latimer(06 of07)
Open Image Modal
Robert Latimer was convicted of second-degree murder in the 1993 death of his severely disabled daughter Tracy. A lack of oxygen during Tracy's birth led to cerebral palsy and serious mental and physical disabilities, including seizures and the inability to walk or talk. Her father ended Tracy's life by placing her in his truck and connecting a hose to the vehicle's exhaust.

The case led to a heated debate over euthanasia in Canada and two Supreme Court challenges.

Latimer was granted day parole in 2008 and full parole in 2010. (CP)
(credit:CP)
Bills To Legalize(07 of07)
Open Image Modal
Former Bloc Québécois MP Francine Lalonde tried repeatedly to get legislation legalizing euthanasia in Canada passed. Bill C-407 and Bill C-384 were both aimed at making assisted suicide legal. C-384 was defeated in the House 228 to 59, with many Bloc MPs and a handful of members from all other parties voting for the legislation.

Tetraplegic Tory MP Steven Fletcher, pictured, made the following statement after C-384 was defeated:

"I would like to be recorded as abstaining on this bill. The reason is I believe end of life issues need to be debated more in our country. I believe that life should be the first choice but not the only choice and that we have to ensure that resources and supports are provided to Canadians so that choice is free. I believe, when all is said and done, the individual is ultimately responsible. I want to make this decision for myself, and if I cannot, I want my family to make the decision. I believe most Canadians, or many Canadians, feel the same. As William Henley said in his poem Invictus, "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul."

(CP)
(credit:CP)
-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.