This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.
The Blogabolish senateabolish the senatecanadian senate

Let's Follow Saskatchewan's Lead and Move to Abolish the Senate

Saskatchewan is one of the richest jurisdictions in Canada, second only to Alberta, and has once more lit a firestorm that may sweep the west and profoundly change Canada's politics. Like the launch of public health care and refusal to let foreigners buy Potash Corporation, Saskatchewan led the nation with its initiative to abolish the Canadian Senate.
By 

Editor-at-Large, The National Post

Editor-at-Large, The National Post
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Open Image Modal

Saskatchewan is one of the richest jurisdictions in Canada, second only to Alberta, and has once more lit a firestorm that may sweep the west and profoundly change Canada's politics.

Like the launch of public health care and refusal to let foreigners buy Potash Corporation, Saskatchewan led the nation with its initiative to abolish the Canadian Senate.

Pioneering Premier Brad Wall polled his citizens this summer and said they believe the Senate no longer serves a useful purpose and is not worth the nearly $100 million a year it costs.

I have crusaded against the Canadian Senate for several years and regard the institution as a pale and corrupting imitation of Britain's useless House of Lords. Unelected institutions have no right to sit in judgment of laws and are illegitimate vestiges from Medieval institutions that Britain spread far and wide throughout its empire.

In my book Merger of the Century: Why Canada and America Should Become One Country I have a chapter devoted to reforms that the two countries must undertake if a merger never happens. In Canada's case, ridding itself of its patronage-addled Senate is the first and important step toward creating a more cohesive country. The next step is to replace it with a Senate similar to America's or Australia's -- elected and designed to give unpopulated regions equal say in governing to counterbalance the domination of populated regions such as Ontario and Quebec in Canada.

Good for Saskatchewan and good for Canada. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court of Canada as to whether he can abolish and/or reform the Canadian Senate.

Saskatchewan's voice is now loud and clear and must be heeded by the rest of the country.

Canadians have only their corrupt and incompetent Senate -- controlled by Ontario and Quebec -- to lose.

The move comes a day after the Senate voted to suspend three of its senators from the upper chamber, including Saskatchewan's Pamela Wallin; Quebec's Patrick Brazeau and Mike Duffy of no fixed address. A fourth senator, Harb, resigned under a cloud involving expense account creativity as is the case with the three recently suspended people.

They are an embarrassment to the country and so is the Senate.

Key Senate Scandal Quotes
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, question period, Feb. 13(01 of18)
Open Image Modal
"In terms of Sen. Wallin, I have looked at the numbers. Her travel costs are comparable to any parliamentarian travelling from that particular area of the country over that period of time. For instance, last year Sen. Wallin spent almost half of her time in the province she represents in the Senate. The costs are to travel to and from that province, as any similar parliamentarian would do." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Wallin speaking Wednesday in her own defence(02 of18)
Open Image Modal
"By throwing a member of this Senate under the bus, finding her guilty without a fair hearing such as any other Canadian could expect — a right guaranteed us by the charter — to proceed without the evidence having been adduced and considered on which the charge in the motion is based, is a fundamental affront to Canadian democracy and makes a mockery of this chamber. This charade is supposedly about preserving the reputation of this place, but the real intent is to remove a perceived liability — namely, me." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)
Harper on Wallin's expenses, question period, Feb. 14(03 of18)
Open Image Modal
"The senator and all other senators and members of the House are fully prepared and committed to have an examination of expenses to ensure that they are appropriate. That is the commitment the government has made in both chambers, a commitment we will keep." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Harper in question period on May 28 on when he learned that former chief of staff Nigel Wright personally wrote a $90,000 cheque to cover Sen. Mike Duffy's expenses(04 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Speaker, I have been very clear on this question. This matter came to my attention two weeks ago, after speculation appeared in the media. On Wednesday, May 15, I was told about it. At that very moment, I demanded that my office ensure that the public was informed, and it was informed appropriately." (credit:HE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Duffy in the Senate on Oct. 22(05 of18)
Open Image Modal
"I made one last effort. I said: 'I don't believe I owe anything, and besides which, I don't have $90,000.' 'Don't worry,' Nigel said. 'I'll write the cheque.'" (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)
Harper in question period, May 28(06 of18)
Open Image Modal
"As I have said repeatedly, my first knowledge of this was on the date and at the time indicated. Prior to that point in time, it was my understanding that Mr. Duffy had paid back his own expenses." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Harper in question period, May 28(07 of18)
Open Image Modal
"If the leader of the NDP is suggesting I had any information to the contrary from Mr. Wright prior to this, that is completely false. I learned of this on May 15 and immediately made this information public, as I have said many times." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Harper in question period, June 4(08 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Speaker, that information was already made public on Feb. 13, and I have been very clear about this. Mr. Duffy approached me after a caucus meeting to discuss this matter. From the beginning, my position has been clear: any inappropriate expenses should be refunded to taxpayers by the senators concerned." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Duffy in his Oct. 22 Senate speech(09 of18)
Open Image Modal
"I've violated no laws, I've followed the rules." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair in question period June 4(10 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Speaker, why then did the Prime Minister, last week, deny instructing any members of his personnel to settle the Mike Duffy matter when he gave that order with that personnel present in the room at a caucus meeting in February of this year?" (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)
Harper, in reply to Mulcair in question period June 4(11 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Speaker, it was my view from the beginning that any inappropriate expenses by any senator should be repaid by the senator, not by somebody else. That was very clear. Those are the facts obviously before us. As I say, my statements on this matter have been very clear and very consistent." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Harper in question period June 5 explaining his meeting with Duffy(12 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Duffy was seeking clarification on remarks I had made to this effect in caucus and I was adamant that any inappropriate expenses had to be reimbursed by him." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jake Wright)
Duffy in the Senate Oct. 22(13 of18)
Open Image Modal
"So after caucus on Feb. 13 of this year, I met the prime minister and Nigel Wright, just the three of us. I said that despite the smear in the papers, I had not broken the rules, but the prime minister wasn't interested in explanations or the truth. It's not about what you did; it's about the perception of what you did that has been created in the media." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Harper in question period Oct. 23, referring to Duffy's account of the Feb. 13 meeting(14 of18)
Open Image Modal
"No, Mr. Speaker I absolutely did not say that." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)
Duffy to the Senate on Oct. 22(15 of18)
Open Image Modal
"I argued: I'm just following the rules like all of the others. But it didn't work. I was ordered by the prime minister: Pay the money back, end of discussion. Nigel Wright was present throughout, just the three of us." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)
Harper in question period on June 5(16 of18)
Open Image Modal
"I have made it very clear what my views were to all my staff and to our caucus. We expect inappropriate expenses to be reimbursed and I would expect they would be reimbursed by the person who incurred them. I would certainly not expect them to be reimbursed by somebody else." (credit:GETTY IMAGES/Simon Hayter)
Harper in question period on June 5(17 of18)
Open Image Modal
"Mr. Speaker, as I have indicated, Mr. Wright informed me of his personal cheque on May 15. This was an error in judgment. He indicated he did this because he believed that taxpayers should be reimbursed and he was prepared to ensure that happened, as in fact it did happen. However, obviously this was an error in judgment for many reasons that have already been outlined and for that reason, I accepted his resignation." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Harper at a news conference on July 6 in Calgary(18 of18)
Open Image Modal
"I think if you read the affidavit it makes very clear that the decision to pay money to Mr. Duffy out of Mr Wright’s personal funds was made solely by Mr. Wright and was his responsibility. Obviously, had I known about this earlier I would never have allowed this to take place. When I answered questions about this in the House of Commons I answered questions to the best of my knowledge." (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Suggest a correction
-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.