This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

Poor People Aren't Poor Because They're Lazy

It is essential that poor people are not the scapegoat for the problem of our public system. As a society we need to stop blaming the victims of poverty for their circumstances. But rather focus on solution that causes poverty.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Open Image Modal
Skincare University

Contrary to popular belief people are not poor because they're lazy. They are poor because of the inefficient in public services and public policy that has become a barrier in their pursuit of financial stability. It is essential that poor people are not the scapegoat for the problem of our public system. As a society we need to stop blaming the victims of poverty for their circumstances. But rather focus on solution that causes poverty.

This idea that only developing nations are the only ones facing poverty is false.

Canada is one of the wealthiest developed nations that have one of the highest poverty rates. Over the past couple years poverty has been increasing within this nation. It has been estimated that about 3.5-million Canadians are living in poverty. Within the estimated number of Canadians that live in poverty about 637,000 are children.

In the Society Reports card, Canada received a C grade in child poverty, income inequality and gender inequality compare to other wealthy develop nations.

Poverty does not just have one facet so we cannot fight poverty with just one solution. Poverty is a multi-faceted and complex issue that requires government in powers to establish anti-poverty strategies that will improve housing, early childhood education, income support, and pension's plans for seniors, tax benefit employment, and education and health care services for all individuals.

Without governments not addressing the fundamental problems that affect individual ability to self-sustain themselves, this will make it difficult for them to be in a position of financial stability.

Poverty robs individual from any sense of security, the privilege of making choices, having opportunities and having access to resources.

In Canada 40 per cent of people living in poverty are people with disabilities, who are more likely to be unemployed. Another 40 per cent are children who rely on the food bank and about 770,000 people rely on the food bank every month.

As a society we need to understand the importance of safety net that will help individuals and families to escape the chains of poverty. In order for low-income families and individual to find financial security it is the responsibility of the government to invest in programs and push public policy with an anti-poverty strategies focus.

Public policy reform needs to guarantee Canadian with decent employment, child benefit, and affordable housing options, for them to be in a position to care for them and care for those that dependent on them.

Unless we do not address the inequalities and inefficiencies with many public policies and public services that many wealthy developed nations are facing, there will be less progress in improving poverty gaps.

In order for government parties in office to care for public policies that address poverty it all depends on the general public. Their demands and their persistence to ensure that government are made accountable to represent and create safety nets for people that need it the most.

ALSO ON HUFFPOST:

The Tories And Child Poverty
Everyone else uses Labour's 'discredited' measure(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
The OECD and the European Union are organisations that still use the relative poverty measure as it is still the standard international measure. As independent policy analyst Declan Gaffney explains: "It is hard to see why the measure should be suitable for other countries but not the UK."
IDS used to want "discredited" relative poverty tackled(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
Iain Duncan Smith used to claim all forms of poverty, "absolute or relative", must be dealt with.In a foreword to a report from the Conservative Party Social Justice Policy Group in 2006, he wrote: "All forms of poverty – absolute and relative – must be dealt with."
People weren't lifted over "one side of an arbitrary line"(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
Osborne and IDS insist that they are not happy with "measuring our achievement simply by how many children are moved from one side of an arbitrary line to the other."However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies' Matt Brewer concluded that the pair are wrong as "there was no cynical lifting of incomes from just below to just over an arbitrary line."He adds: "The beneficiaries from the government’s increases to tax credits or families were spread widely across the bottom half of the income distribution, and the income gains were anything but nugatory"
Cameron disagrees with Osborne and IDS(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
Osborne and IDS both sniff at the "discredited" relative poverty measure, defined as 60% of median income, as used under Labour.Their cynicism contrasts with David Cameron, who warned that "poverty is relative – and those who pretend otherwise are wrong".
Most families hit by child poverty aren't workless(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
Despite IDS and Osborne's promise to tackle child poverty in "workless" families, figures from the Department for Work and Pensions show that two-thirds (66%) of children growing up in poverty live in a family where at least one member works.Also 71% of children in poverty are in couple households, so poverty doesn't just hit children of single parents.
Child poverty still will increase under the coalition(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2.7 million children will be in relative poverty by the general election, with that number soaring yet higher to 3.2 million in 2020.
Even the 300,000 fall in child poverty is thanks to Labour...(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
The data lag means that the initial 300,000 fall in child poverty from 2010 to 2012 would have been brought about by Labour's policies.Lindsay Judge from the Child Poverty Action Group explains that it is "primarily the result of policies they inherited – most notably the over-indexation of child tax credit – from which they have subsequently retreated".
The coalition will fail its target to get child poverty under control(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
Unless the government repeals the Child Poverty Act 2010, the target of reducing child poverty to 10% remains on the statute book.And the government is on track to miss its legally binding target by a massive margin of 2 million.
You won't know they've failed to tackle it until 2016(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
There is a data lag for child poverty, so the 400,000 projected increase in the number of children in poverty won't be shown in the data until 2016.
Child poverty is still worse here than in Slovenia(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
In a Unicef study of children's material well-being, measuring how little money and essentials they have, the UK came below other advanced economies like France and Austria.
-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.