This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

Rajyavardhan Rathore Wants To Do Away With Censorship, But Change Will Still Take Time

Rajyavardhan Rathore Wants To Do Away With Censorship, But Let's Not Celebrate Just Yet
|
Open Image Modal
Hindustan Times via Getty Images
NEW DELHI, INDIA - NOVEMBER 11: Minister of State for Information & Broadcasting, Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore addressing a press conference on 45th International Film Festival of India on November 11, 2014 in New Delhi, India. 45th International Film Festival of India (IFFI 2014) will be held in Goa from 20th to 30th November 2014. (Photo by Vipin Kumar/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

Film censorship has dominated headlines over the past few days, as the whole #SanskaariJamesBond controversy (which erupted last week after the Central Board of Film Certification asked for some rather ridiculous cuts to the latest James Bond film, Spectre) became a talking point recently.

This was followed by a sprawling interview of l’enfant terrible Pahlaj Nihalani, the incumbent chairman of the CBFC (commonly referred to as the Censor Board), that appeared on the front page of Mumbai Mirror on Sunday. The piece, which has been widely shared on social media, ran with the headline ‘You want to do sex in your house with the door open’ — Nihalani’s actual response to a question on how it makes a difference if a kiss lasts for a few seconds as opposed to, say, a minute.

The ongoing ninth edition of Film Bazaar — a film market organised every year by the government body National Film Development Corporation of India (NDFC) that takes place in Panjim, Goa — saw a visit by Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting, within whose purview the CBFC exists.

In a press conference held at the Film Bazaar venue on Saturday, Rathore spoke to journalists (this writer included) about the various issues concerning film censorship in India. Here are some of the minister’s reponses to the concerns that were raised:

On censorship itself

“The main role of the CBFC is certification, not censorship. CBFC cannot give suggestions to filmmakers to cut scenes and change details. That can only certify the film. If a producer wants to make changes, he can make them himself. We are very clear on this.”

On the long-overdue updation of the Cinematograph Act of 1952, which forms the basis for how films are certified in India

“The I&B Ministry is working on a new Act. The Justice Mudgal Committee is ready with the first draft. After taking more opinions from experts, we may put it out in the public domain.”

On how the ministry is working towards making the process of censorship more transparent

“We are setting up an online process of certification wherein no CBFC member can decide the date on which a producer will screen his film, so there is no pressure on him. Once our software improves, we might take the entire process online, whereby you don’t have to meet or interact with anyone. We could achieve this in the next five years.”

On the ground reality of how Nihalani has allegedly been ignoring the rules (such as the decision to revoke a controversial ‘cuss word list’) as well as the issues raised by other CBFC board members

“The government does not interfere with their [CBFC’s] day-to-day activities… [however] what you are saying is absolutely true. This news has reached Mantralaya and the Board members are constantly updating us. The board should work together and its actions should be in favour of films, the government, and, of course, the entertainment of people. Also, thanks for mentioning our stand, and it still remains very clear: the language used in the film has to keeping in with the script and the scene and therefore an appropriate certification has to be given.”

On how this stand applies to films that are refused certification for other reasons, such as Kamal Swaroop’s documentary Battle For Benaras, which is allegedly being delayed by the CBFC on grounds of being overly critical of Prime Minister Narendra Modi

“I won’t go into individual cases, but we’ll have a discussion with the board and take the appropriate steps. Ultimately, what the Board decides is up to them. The people of our country are all mature enough to know what they can or cannot watch. And therefore the job is certification.”

When asked when this ideal would be followed by the CBFC

“You don’t expect everything to get sorted on day 1, right? It takes time. Give it time and it will get sorted out. I like how you think with this government that six months is a long time but 60 years wasn’t enough for you to complain. Everything, at some level, should lead to progress for the country. And I thank you for your faith in the government."

Open Image Modal
Open Image Modal
Open Image Modal

Contact HuffPost India

Also see on HuffPost:

6 Times Anushka Sharma Nailed It While Speaking About Censorship
(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
Yeah… because ultimately you are making a film which is an honest rendition of something that exists in our society, and there is no glorification of anything that can be objectionable.
On being asked whether the censor troubles that NH10 went through worried her, as one of the producers of the film.
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
There is rage. And that is the other thing. Our rage doesn’t unleash itself because we follow the system – judiciary, police etc. So our rage is directed at the systems that don’t work. We all talk about freedom of speech and having opinions. But what is happening is that there is moral policing and people saying that I am so convinced about my opinion that I will be pissed off if you don’t agree with me. That is why we are talking about bans, and taking out material from films.
On why she thinks 'moral policing' occurs in India
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
I just think there is just complete lack of compassion. When you make a film and you are told to reduce the violence. What is happening in real life is much more brutal. What we are making is much milder, and then you tell us to reduce by 30 percent? What does that mean? How do you do that?
On how she feels about the Censor Board's approach to cuts.
(credit:AP)
(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
Now I know when we are reading a script or making a movie, we are going to think “Is this going to get passed?” And that’s not how you want to make movies.
On how she feels rigid censorship will affect cinema
(credit:STR/AFP/Getty Images)
(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
We are breeding a 'ban mentality'. You are irritating people to the degree that it's suffocating them. We are educated people, we know what's right and what's not. Let us think for ourselves than follow a particular ideology.
When asked to describe the current climate of censorship in India
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
Believe in the certification. It's there for a reason. Films depict what's there in reality.
On how she would like audiences to approach movies
(credit:BCCL)
-- This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.