Giving Doctors More Money Does Not Improve Access to Care | HuffPost

This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

If the current investment in physician compensation was intended to improve the accessibility of medical care, then the data from Quebec show that this was a policy failure. Not only was there no improvement, but the problem actually worsened. In Quebec, it appears we are investing more money to pay more physicians to get less care.

By

Research Officer, University of Montreal Public Health Research Institute

and

Professor in Nursing; CIHR Chair in Applied Public Health; Expert Advisor, EvidenceNetwork.ca

Research Officer, University of Montreal Public Health Research Institute

Professor in Nursing; CIHR Chair in Applied Public Health; Expert Advisor, EvidenceNetwork.ca

|

This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

The amount paid to doctors in Canada increased by $7.5 billion in the last five years to reach a total of over $30 billion per year. Put another way, the growth rate of physician remuneration expenditures -- what our health system pays to doctors for health services -- was more than twice the rate at which the Canadian economy grew over the same period (around 6.4 per cent per year).

No one would argue that this is a lot of money in itself, and a growing proportion of our collective wealth. At the same time, every new report on our health care system, including from the Commonwealth Fund, the Health Council of Canada and the College of Family Physicians of Canada, continues to highlight what little progress has been made regarding the accessibility of health care.

So what's going on here? We invest ever-growing sums in physician remuneration without noticing much improvement in the availability of medical visits and procedures. How can this be the case?

In a new study in Healthcare Policy published this week, we used the latest available data from Quebec to analyze the evolution of medical services costs and volumes of care over five years (from 2007 to 2011) to gain a better understanding of the relationship between physician fees and availability of care. The results prompt some important policy considerations.

In 2007, after bitter negotiations between physician federations and the Quebec government, agreements were signed to significantly increase fee schedules. Over the following five years the average cost per service rose by 25 per cent for family doctors and 32 per cent for specialists (the term service describes all medical care provided, such as visits, procedures and tests). At the same time, the number of physicians per capita grew by 8 per cent to reach an unprecedented number of physicians in the province.

These two trends combined increased medical compensation expenditures in Quebec by $1.5 billion over five years. After controlling for inflation, these investments translate into average net income increases of 15 per cent for family doctors and 25 per cent for specialists. As these are inflation-controlled figures, these are real increases in purchasing power.

What's interesting, however, is that during this same period, the average number of specialized service visits per inhabitant stagnated, and the average number of family medicine service visits per person actually dropped by 5 per cent. The average number of services provided by each physician also dropped by 5 per cent for specialists and 7 per cent for family doctors.

In other words, the net impact of investing an additional $1.5 billion dollars - no small sum -- in physician remuneration was either a stagnation or reduction in the volume of services provided to the population. Moreover, the decrease in the average volume of services per physician offsets most or all of the increases in the overall number of physicians. What should have been two steps forward was more like one step back, but at great cost to the public purse.

Unfortunately, this result is not surprising. In fact, it is highly convergent with what is known in economics as the 'target income hypothesis.' This hypothesis posits that people aim for a given level of income and will adjust their work load to reach it. This implies, among other things, that when the rate paid for a given amount of work increases, workers might choose to work less rather than to increase their revenues.

What our study shows is that as the unit price of services rose, physicians -- who are overwhelmingly self-employed entrepreneurs -- adjusted their work practice to improve their quality of life instead of opting to earn more.

End result: Quebecers did not see an improvement in health service availability despite a sizeable new investment in health care.

Some believe that physicians deserve to be paid more, while others oppose transferring additional public funds to the society's wealthiest. This is a moral debate. What we'd like to emphasize instead is the failure of the policy goal. If the current investment in physician compensation was intended to improve the accessibility of medical care, then the data from Quebec show that this was a policy failure. Not only was there no improvement, but the problem actually worsened.

In Quebec, it appears we are investing more money to pay more physicians to get less care.

Few -- if anyone at all -- know the real effects of recent major investments in physician compensation in the other provinces across the country. It is time that these investments are monitored, analysed and publicly debated. Throwing money at a problem, is not always a solution.

ALSO ON HUFFPOST:

10 Ways Inequality May Be Making Life Worse

Health(01 of20)

According to data compiled by the Equality Trust, Americans living in more economically equal states live four years longer, on average, than Americans in less equal states. That trend holds true for the developed world as a whole. This chart shows the correlation between infant deaths and income inequality across the developed world. (credit:Alamy)

Health(02 of20)

According to data compiled by the Equality Trust, Americans living in more economically equal states live four years longer, on average, than Americans in less equal states. That trend holds true for the developed world as a whole. This chart shows the correlation between infant deaths and income inequality across the developed world.

Mental Health(03 of20)

Data from the World Health Organization, compiled by the Equality Trust, shows a strong correlation between incidences of mental illness and a country's relative income gap. In this comparison of 12 developed countries, the U.S. has the highest income inequality and the highest rate of mental illness. (credit:Alamy)

Mental Health(04 of20)

Data from the World Health Organization, compiled by the Equality Trust, shows a strong correlation between incidences of mental illness and a country's relative income gap. In this comparison of 12 developed countries, the U.S. has the highest income inequality and the highest rate of mental illness.

Drug Abuse(05 of20)

Data from the UN's World Drug Report 2007, compiled by the Equality Trust, shows a link between a country's income gap and drug use. The correlation isn't perfect -- Australia has higher drug use rates than the U.S., while having a significantly smaller income gap -- but it does show that Europe's more economically equal countries enjoy considerably lower illicit drug use rates. The Equality Trust also found a similar link in drug use rates within U.S. states. (credit:Alamy)

Drug Abuse(06 of20)

Data from the UN's World Drug Report 2007, compiled by the Equality Trust, shows a link between a country's income gap and drug use. The correlation isn't perfect -- Australia has higher drug use rates than the U.S., while having a significantly smaller income gap -- but it does show that Europe's more economically equal countries enjoy considerably lower illicit drug use rates. The Equality Trust also found a similar link in drug use rates within U.S. states.

Education(07 of20)

The quality of school systems is important but the most important factor in determining education outcomes is family background, reports the Equality Trust. In that light, it's clear why income inequality would affect educational attainment: In places where struggling families have the least support, this translates into worse educational outcomes. This chart comparing U.S. states shows a strong correlation between the income gap and high school dropout rates. (credit:Alamy)

Education(08 of20)

The quality of school systems is important but the most important factor in determining education outcomes is family background, reports the Equality Trust. In that light, it's clear why income inequality would affect educational attainment: In places where struggling families have the least support, this translates into worse educational outcomes. This chart comparing U.S. states shows a strong correlation between the income gap and high school dropout rates.

Imprisonment(09 of20)

A study published in Social Sciences and Medicine found a strong correlation between U.S. states with high income inequality and imprisonment rates. Countries that have large differences between rich and poor tend to incarcerate criminals for longer periods than those with smaller income gaps. The Equality Trust notes that this holds true even among U.S. states -- Louisiana incarcerates at six times the rate of Minnesota. (credit:Alamy)

Imprisonment(10 of20)

A study published in Social Sciences and Medicine found a strong correlation between U.S. states with high income inequality and imprisonment rates. Countries that have large differences between rich and poor tend to incarcerate criminals for longer periods than those with smaller income gaps. The Equality Trust notes that this holds true even among U.S. states -- Louisiana incarcerates at six times the rate of Minnesota.

Obesity(11 of20)

The obesity epidemic sweeping the developed world could be the first medical issue to reduce life expectancy in wealthy countries in more than a century, the Equality Trust says. The Trust found a correlation between obesity rates and income inequality across the developing world, with childhood obesity also correlated to the income gap in a given country or U.S. state. (credit:Alamy)

Obesity(12 of20)

The obesity epidemic sweeping the developed world could be the first medical issue to reduce life expectancy in wealthy countries in more than a century, the Equality Trust says. The Trust found a correlation between obesity rates and income inequality across the developing world, with childhood obesity also correlated to the income gap in a given country or U.S. state.

Social Mobility(13 of20)

Studies have shown that Americans tend to believe their country has a high rate of social mobility -- the ability to improve your economic situation -- while Europeans tend to have less faith in it. The evidence suggests it should be reversed -- those European countries with smaller income gaps actually have greater economic and social mobility, while in the U.S., and other countries with high income gaps, going from rags-to-riches is more difficult. (credit:Alamy)

Social Mobility(14 of20)

Studies have shown that Americans tend to believe their country has a high rate of social mobility -- the ability to improve your economic situation -- while Europeans tend to have less faith in it. The evidence suggests it should be reversed -- those European countries with smaller income gaps actually have greater economic and social mobility, while in the U.S., and other countries with high income gaps, going from rags-to-riches is more difficult.

Violent Crime(15 of20)

According to the Equality Trust, there are more than 40 studies showing a link between inequality and violent crime. "The most important reason why violence is more common in more unequal societies is that it is often triggered by people feeling looked down, disrespected and loss of face," the Trust argues. This chart shows a ten-fold difference in murder rates between developed countries. (credit:Alamy)

Violent Crime(16 of20)

According to the Equality Trust, there are more than 40 studies showing a link between inequality and violent crime. "The most important reason why violence is more common in more unequal societies is that it is often triggered by people feeling looked down, disrespected and loss of face," the Trust argues. This chart shows a ten-fold difference in murder rates between developed countries.

Teen Pregnancy(17 of20)

There is a strong correlation between income inequality in countries and the birth rate for teenage girls. This chart shows the U.S. teen birth rate at a particularly high level, but differences in abortion rates between countries mean it's hard to tell how this correlates to teen pregnancies. (credit:Alamy)

Teen Pregnancy(18 of20)

There is a strong correlation between income inequality in countries and the birth rate for teenage girls. This chart shows the U.S. teen birth rate at a particularly high level, but differences in abortion rates between countries mean it's hard to tell how this correlates to teen pregnancies.

Child Well-Being(19 of20)

A recent UNICEF study that tracked 40 indicators of childhood well-being found a correlation between income inequality and the standard of living for children. Interestingly, the Equality Trust argues that, at this point, further economic growth won't address this issue. "Improvements in child wellbeing in rich societies will depend more on reductions in inequality than on further economic growth," the Trust argues. (credit:Alamy)

Child Well-Being(20 of20)

A recent UNICEF study that tracked 40 indicators of childhood well-being found a correlation between income inequality and the standard of living for children. Interestingly, the Equality Trust argues that, at this point, further economic growth won't address this issue. "Improvements in child wellbeing in rich societies will depend more on reductions in inequality than on further economic growth," the Trust argues.

Suggest a correction

-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.

From Our Partner