This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

India Fumes After China Blocks UN Sanctions On Masood Azhar

India Fumes After China Blocks UN Sanctions On Masood Azhar
|
Open Image Modal
INDRANIL MUKHERJEE via Getty Images
Indian activists carry placards of the chief of Jaish-e-Mohammad, Maulana Masood Azhar during a protest against the attack on the air force base in Pathankot, in Mumbai on January 4, 2016. Indian troops backed by helicopters searched an air force base January 4, after a weekend of fierce fighting with suspected Islamic insurgents in which seven soldiers and at least four attackers were killed. AFP PHOTO/ Indranil MUKHERJEE / AFP / INDRANIL MUKHERJEE (Photo credit should read INDRANIL MUKHERJEE/AFP/Getty Images)

India has reacted sharply to China scuttling its attempt to get JeM chief Masood Azhar designated as terrorist by the UN, but China stood its ground.

Expressing its strong "disappointment" over the development, India said it finds it "incomprehensible" that while the Pakistan-based JeM was listed in UN Security Council Committee for its well known terror activities and links to the Al Qaeda, the designation of the group's "main leader, financier and motivator" has been put on a "technical hold".

In a strongly-worded statement, India slammed China's virtual veto of its attempt to blacklist Pathankot terror strike mastermind Azhar, saying "this does not reflect well on the determination that the international community needs to display to decisively defeat the menace of terrorism".

Last July, China had similarly halted India's move in the UN to take action against Pakistan for its release of Mumbai terror attack mastermind Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi.

External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup said the UN sanctions committee was taking a "selective approach" in tackling terrorism, adding that "Its working methods, based on the principles of unanimity and anonymity, is leading the Committee to adopt a selective approach to combating terrorism."

However, China defended its action, maintaining JeM chief does not qualify to be nailed as a "terrorist" to face UN sanctions as his case "did not meet" the Security Council's requirements.

After the attack on the IAF base at Pathankot on January 2, India in February wrote to the UN calling for immediate action to list Azhar under the Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee.

"Any listing would have to meet the requirements" for blacklisting, Chinese Permanent Representative to the UN Liu Jieyi told reporters yesterday in response to questions over China's decision to place a 'technical hold' on designating Azhar in the UN Sanctions Committee.

After the attack on the IAF base at Pathankot on January 2, India in February wrote to the UN calling for immediate action to list Azhar under the Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee.

The India submission was considered by the Counter- Terrorism Executive Directorate (CTED) for technical aspects of the evidence provided. The technical team then with the support of the US, UK and France had sent it to all the members. However, hours before the deadline, China requested the Committee to hold up the banning of the JeM chief.

In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei defended China's decision, saying that it acts on such issues based on facts and rules in an "objective and just manner".

This is not the first time China has blocked India's bid to get Pakistan-based militant groups and leaders proscribed by the UN.

The UN had banned the JeM in 2001 but India's efforts for a ban on Azhar after the 2008 Mumbai terror attack also did not fructify as China, that has veto powers, did not allow the ban apparently at the behest of Pakistan again.

Last July, China had similarly halted India's move in the UN to take action against Pakistan for its release of Mumbai terror attack mastermind Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, saying that its stand was "based on facts and in the spirit of objectiveness and fairness" with Beijing again claiming at the time that it was in touch with New Delhi.

Open Image Modal
Open Image Modal
Open Image Modal

Contact HuffPost India

Also See On HuffPost:

The Jobs Most Likely To Make You Drink
Mining(01 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the Washington Post, this study (based on government data) shows the rate of drinking and drug usage by employees in different industries. The study showed that 18 per cent of miners were heavy drinkers, consuming five or more drinks at the same time. (credit:RAUL ARBOLEDA via Getty Images)
Construction(02 of19)
Open Image Modal
Miners and construction workers have a strong preference for alcohol. (credit:hatalmas/Flickr)
Hotels/ Restaurants(03 of19)
Open Image Modal
Whether young or old, male or female, restaurant and hotel workers are the heaviest drug users in the nation. (credit:liber/Flickr)
Arts/ Entertainment(04 of19)
Open Image Modal
The study shows that 14 per cent of arts and entertainment workers engaged in drug use as compared to hotel and restaurant workers (19 per cent). (credit:Lin Pernille Photography LLC/Flickr)
Utilities(05 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the study, the overall rate of the past month (at the time the study was conducted) heavy alcohol use among full-time workers aged 18 to 64 was 8.7 per cent. (credit:Scott Olson via Getty Images)
Wholesale(06 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the article, employees in the wholesale industry ranked higher than the retail industry in terms of drinking percentage. (credit:Alexandre Dulaunoy/Flickr)
Management(07 of19)
Open Image Modal
Surprisingly, 12 per cent of managers engage in drug usage. (credit:Amy Sussman/Invision/AP)
Manufacturing(08 of19)
Open Image Modal
The results of the study showed that heavy alcohol usage, use of drugs, and substance use disorders were linked with negative work behaviours such as absenteeism and frequent job changes. (credit:BiblioArchives / LibraryArchives/Flickr)
Agriculture(09 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the study, comparisons between combined 2003 to 2007 data and combined 2008 to 2012 data show that the rates of past month illicit drug use increased among workers in the accommodations and food services industry (from 16.9 to 19.1 per cent). (credit:ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Retail(10 of19)
Open Image Modal
The retail industry ranks midway when it comes to alcohol and illicit drug usage. (credit:sean dreilinger/Flickr)
Transportation(11 of19)
Open Image Modal
Even though the transportation industry is marked relatively low on the list, it might warrant some concern given its required responsibilities. (credit:TORU YAMANAKA via Getty Images)
Real Estate(12 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the article, men drink and do drugs more heavily than women. (credit:deborah is lola/Flickr)
Other Services(13 of19)
Open Image Modal
According to the study, the lowest rates of heavy alcohol use, illicit drug use, and substance use disorder were seen in education, health care and social assistance, and public administration (credit:phidauex/Flickr)
Information(14 of19)
Open Image Modal
If an industry is dominated by younger workers, it would rank higher in terms of drinking and drug usage rate, says the study. (credit:ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Finance(16 of19)
Open Image Modal
The study conducted by National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) defines heavy alcohol use as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on 5 or more days in the past 30 days. (credit:kenteegardin/Flickr)
Government(17 of19)
Open Image Modal
Government employees are least likely to use illicit drugs. (credit:DonkeyHotey/Flickr)
Education(18 of19)
Open Image Modal
Only 5 per cent of educators drink heavily, and a similar proportion report regular drug use. (credit:Domiriel/Flickr)
Healthcare(19 of19)
Open Image Modal
This group ranks the lowest when it comes to alcohol intake or drug usage, says the study. (credit:Carl Court via Getty Images)
-- This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.