Cet article fait partie des archives en ligne du HuffPost Québec, qui a fermé ses portes en 2021.

Désolé TransCanada... Nous avons perdu vos valises!

Votre projet de transport du pétrole des sables bitumineux de l'Alberta sur le territoire du Québec ne passera pas.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Chers représentants et dirigeants de TransCanada, de l'industrie des combustibles fossiles et des gouvernements,

Nous avons le regret de vous annoncer que nous avons perdu vos valises démagogiques dans le transport de votre projet de pipeline sécuritaire. Pire encore, nous croyons même qu'elles ont été endommagées irrémédiablement avec les documents stratégiques de la firme de relations publiques Edelman!

Un autre incident est survenu dimanche dernier, le 23 novembre, alors que Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, récipiendaire d'un prix littéraire, a fait don de sa bourse de 25 000 $, lors de l'émission Tout le monde en parle, aux regroupements citoyens qui, justement, «parlent des vraies affaires» avec la campagne «Coule pas chez nous».

Cet incident anodin a dégénéré hors de notre contrôle alors que M. Nadeau-Dubois a invité les citoyens à doubler la mise. Comme je l'écrivais dans mon précédent texte, les citoyens savent et vous observent, mais surtout ils ont des exigences sociales, et cette invitation ne pouvait être une meilleure occasion de les exprimer. Ainsi, ils ont non seulement doublé la mise, mais ils l'ont multipliée par plus de 15! L'austérité n'existe pas quand il est question de protéger la vie...

Alors, prenez bien note que les conditions de voyage ont complètement changé et que nous ne pouvons plus faire preuve d'acceptabilité aveugle sans réagir face à toute la poudre aux yeux que vous lancez partout dans les médias et vos rencontres d'information. Cette poudre est salissante et toxique pour l'objectivité de votre projet. Nous sommes de plus en plus immunisés contre votre magie. Sachez également que cet incident s'est aussi répercuté dans les médias américains.

Votre projet de transport du pétrole des sables bitumineux de l'Alberta sur le territoire du Québec ne passera pas. Nous vous recommandons de choisir une autre destination. Mais entre nous, avec tout ce que nous savons depuis 1990 sur les changements climatiques, ne serait-il pas temps de changer de moyen de transport?

La cigarette est très mal perçue dans le public. Le même changement de perception est en train de s'opérer concernant les combustibles fossiles et leurs technologies primitives. Pour tous ceux qui l'ont essayée, l'automobile électrique crée un engouement similaire aux produits d'Apple, cette compagnie censée être en faillite, mais dont la capitalisation boursière est de 700 milliards de dollars, presque le double d'Exxon!

Vous connaissez mal vos clients. Nous voulons de la haute technologie de pointe, des véhicules électriques, des routes solaires qui rechargent les véhicules par induction pendant qu'on roule, des accumulateurs au graphène qu'on recharge en deux minutes. Les centaines de milliards à développer sont là, dans ces technologies que nous voulons acheter demain matin et qui ne détruiront pas le climat de la seule planète habitable dont nous disposons.

Vous auriez mieux fait de nous confier des valises solides et bien conçues avec des études scientifiques, environnementales et climatiques globales, intégrées et internationales. Mais au fait, êtes-vous capables de faire preuve d'intégration? Produire plus de 30 000 pages d'économie, c'est facile, mais faites-en autant pour le climat! Sans même nous fournir les conclusions des études que vous n'avez pas faites, nous savons déjà que le pétrole doit rester dans le sol.

Nous savons ce que nous voulons... Et ce n'est pas ce que vous souhaitez qu'on ait besoin!

VOIR AUSSI SUR LE HUFFPOST

Des photos étonnantes des sables bitumineux
(01 of44)
Open Image Modal
Syncrude\'s Mildred Lake Upgrader, part of The Syncrude Project complex for oil sands processing, is pictured Monday, March 8, 2006 in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada. (credit:Getty)
(02 of44)
Open Image Modal
The Syncrude oil sands extraction facility is reflected in a lake reclaimed from an old mine near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada on October 22, 2009. (credit:Getty)
(03 of44)
Open Image Modal
A disused mining machine on display in front of the Syncrude oil sands extraction facility near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta on October 22, 2009. \n (credit:Getty)
(04 of44)
Open Image Modal
The Suncor oilsands operation uses trucks that are 3 stories tall, weigh one million pounds, and cost 7 million dollars each. (credit:Getty)
(05 of44)
Open Image Modal
Oil sits on the surface at a Suncor Energy Inc. oilsands mining operation near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, on Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013. Photographer: (credit:Getty)
(06 of44)
Open Image Modal
A large oil refinery along the Athabasca River in Alberta\'s Oilsands. Fort McMurray, Alberta. (credit:Getty)
(07 of44)
Open Image Modal
Oil mixes with water at a tailings pond at a Suncor Energy Inc. oilsands mining operation near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, on Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013. (credit:Getty)
(08 of44)
Open Image Modal
Fort McMurray is in the heart of the world\'s biggest single oil deposit - the Athabasca Oil Sands, and the oil is extracted by surface mining and refined in the region. The oil production is at the heart of the economy. (credit:Getty)
(09 of44)
Open Image Modal
In this Aug. 5, 2005 file photo, the Syncrude upgrader spreads out towards the horizon at the company\'s oil sands project in Ft. McMurray, Alberta, Canada. \n (credit:AP)
(10 of44)
Open Image Modal
This Tuesday, July 10, 2012 aerial photo shows a Nexen oil sands facility near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada. (credit:AP)
(11 of44)
Open Image Modal
This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows an oilsands facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta, Canada. (credit:AP)
(12 of44)
Open Image Modal
This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows an oilsands tailings pond at a mine facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta, Canada. (credit:AP)
(13 of44)
Open Image Modal
This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows an oilsands tailings pond at a mine facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta, Canada. (credit:AP)
(14 of44)
Open Image Modal
The Syncrude extraction facility in the northern Alberta oil sand fields is reflected in the pool of water being recycled for re-use. (credit:Getty Images)
(15 of44)
Open Image Modal
A night view of the Syncrude oil sands extraction facility near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta Province, Canada on October 22, 2009. (credit:Getty)
(16 of44)
Open Image Modal
Aerial view of a lake and forests in the vicinity of oil sands extraction facilities near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada on October 23, 2009. (credit:Getty)
(17 of44)
Open Image Modal
Workers use heavy machinery in the tailings pond at the Syncrude oil sands extraction facility near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta , Canada on October 25, 2009. (credit:Getty)
(18 of44)
Open Image Modal
Fort McMurray is in the heart of the world\'s biggest single oil deposit - the Athabasca Oil Sands, and the oil is extracted by surface mining and refined in the region. The oil production is at the heart of the economy. (credit:Getty)
(19 of44)
Open Image Modal
A large oil refinery in Alberta\'s Oilsands project. Fort McMurray, Alberta. (credit:Getty)
CFB Cold Lake, CNRL(20 of44)
Open Image Modal
A bitumen leak was reported at a Canadian Natural Resources oilsands operation in the weapons range part of the RCAF base in June 2013. (credit:WikiMedia:)
CFB Cold Lake, CNRL(21 of44)
Open Image Modal
Company officials said the leak - at what it calls its Primrose operation - was caused by faulty machinery at one of the wells, affected an area of approximately 13.5 hectares and released as much as 3,200 litres of bitumen each day. (credit:Getty)
CFB Cold Lake, CNRL(22 of44)
Open Image Modal
Preliminary tallies put the death toll from the leak at 16 birds, seven small mammals and 38 amphibians. Dozen were rescued and taken to an Edmonton centre for rehabilitation. (credit:Shutterstock)
CFB Cold Lake(23 of44)
Open Image Modal
As of early August 2013, more than 1.1 million litres of bitumen had been pulled from marshlands, bushes and waterways. (credit:Getty)
CFB Cold Lake, CNRL(24 of44)
Open Image Modal
Although CNRL could not say when the leak may finally be stopped, it estimates it will likely cost more than $40 million to clean up. (credit:Getty)
Plains Midstream(25 of44)
Open Image Modal
Little Buffalo band member Melina Laboucan-Massimo scoops up July 13, 2012 what appears to oil from the pond shoreline near the site of a 4.5 million-litre Plains Midstream pipeline leak detected April 29, 2011. Photos taken at the site and released by Greenpeace of Alberta\'s second-worst pipeline spill suggest at least part of the site remains heavily contaminated despite company suggestions that the cleanup is complete. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-Greenpeace-Joe Whittle)
Plains Midstream Canada(26 of44)
Open Image Modal
A boat passes by a boom stretching out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(27 of44)
Open Image Modal
Debris pushes up against a boom as it stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(28 of44)
Open Image Modal
A boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream(29 of44)
Open Image Modal
A boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(30 of44)
Open Image Modal
A photographer snaps a boom stretching out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada (31 of44)
Open Image Modal
A boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(32 of44)
Open Image Modal
A worker slows traffic while a boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(33 of44)
Open Image Modal
A no swimming sign along the banks of the Gleniffer reservoir while a boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the lake near Innisfail, Alta., Friday, June 12, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of sour crude near Sundre, Alberta, on June 7 and flowed downstream in the Red Deer river to the reservoir. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(34 of44)
Open Image Modal
Oil from a pipeline leak coats a pond near Sundre, Alta., Friday, June 8, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipeline leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of oil. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(35 of44)
Open Image Modal
Oil from a pipeline leak coats a pond near Sundre, Alta., Friday, June 8, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipeline leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of oil. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(36 of44)
Open Image Modal
Oil from a pipeline leak coats a pond near Sundre, Alta., Friday, June 8, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipeline leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of oil. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Plains Midstream Canada(37 of44)
Open Image Modal
Tracks pass through oil on the banks of the Gleniffer reservoir after a pipeline leak near Sundre, Alta., on Friday, June 8, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of oil. (credit:THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
Enbrige's Athabasca pipeline(38 of44)
Open Image Modal
Approximately 1,450 barrels of oil spilled from a pumping station along Enbridge’s Athabasca pipeline in June 2012.\nThe spill occurred approximately 24 kilometres from Elk Point, Alta., a village located 200 kilometres northeast of Edmonton. (credit:(THE CANADIAN PRESS/Larry MacDougal))
Lake Wabamun(39 of44)
Open Image Modal
Wreckage from the August 3rd train derailment and subsequent oil spill is seen lining the shore of Lake Wabamun on Monday, August 8, 2005, as clean-up continues. (credit:(CP PHOTO - Tim Smith))
Lake Wabamun(40 of44)
Open Image Modal
Wreckage and black oil from the August 3rd train derailment and subsequent oil spill are seen lining the shore and waters of Lake Wabamun on Monday, August 8, 2005, as clean-up continues. (credit:(CP PHOTO - Tim Smith))
Lake Wabamun(41 of44)
Open Image Modal
White absorbent boom is seen lining the shores of Lake Wabamun, Alberta, as the clean-up effort from the August 3rd train derailment and subsequent oil spill continues on Monday, August 8, 2005. (credit:(CP PHOTO - Tim Smith))
Lake Wabamun(42 of44)
Open Image Modal
Wreckage and black oil from the August 3rd train derailment and subsequent oil spill are seen lining the shore and waters of Lake Wabamun on Monday, August 8, 2005, as clean-up continues. (credit:(CP PHOTO - Tim Smith))
Lake Wabamun(43 of44)
Open Image Modal
Wreckage and black oil from the August 3rd train derailment and subsequent oil spill are seen lining the shore and waters of Lake Wabamun on Monday, August 8, 2005, as clean-up continues. Lake Wabamun was severely polluted when a train carrying heavy oil derailed on August 3, 2005, spilling much of it\'s load into the lake. (credit:(CP PHOTO - Tim Smith))
Lake Wabamun(44 of44)
Open Image Modal
Rail cars leak bunker fuel oil, meters from summer homes bordering Lake Wabamun, after a freight train derailed, in this August 3, 2005 file photo, near the town of Wabamun, Alta. Canadian National Railway faces an environmental charge stemming from the train derailment and oil spill at a popular Alberta lake last summer. (credit:(CP PICTURE ARCHIVE/ John Ulan))

Open Image Modal
Open Image Modal
-- Cet article fait partie des archives en ligne du HuffPost Canada, qui ont fermé en 2021. Si vous avez des questions ou des préoccupations, veuillez consulter notre FAQ ou contacter support@huffpost.com.