This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

The Closed-Door Media Talks That Could End the Open Internet

Big Media lobbyists and unelected bureaucrats are holding closed-door meetings in Malaysia this week, as they continue secret talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a highly secretive and extreme trade deal that includes extreme new copyright rules that could end the open Internet as we know it.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Big Media lobbyists and unelected bureaucrats are holding closed-door meetings in Malaysia this week, as they continue secret talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The TPP is a highly secretive and extreme trade deal being negotiated by Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Peru, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, the United States, Singapore, and Vietnam.

Reports from Malaysia indicate that the TPP talks are stalled over five key issues -- including a key chapter on copyright and Intellectual Property rights that would censor and criminalize Internet use. This is not good news for Big Media lobbyists, who are demanding the TPP include extreme new copyright rules that could end the open Internet as we know it. Big Media is spending a fortune on lobbying as they try to shore up an old-fashioned, high-cost command and control media business model that no longer makes sense in the Internet age.

TPP organizers are going to incredible lengths to lock citizens out of these negotiations -- when talks recently took place in Vancouver, Canada's trade ministry instituted what amounted to a media blackout, even refusing to tell journalists in which part of town the talks were taking place. TPP documents are top secret -- unless you're one of just 600 big industry lobbyists invited to take part.

Why all this secrecy? Well, because what's on the negotiating table is so unpopular that it would never pass with the whole world watching. We know from leaked documents that the TPP contains extreme proposals on copyright that would never pass muster with the public. According to the drafts Big Media's extreme proposals would criminalize your online activity, invade your privacy, and cost you money.

But it's starting to look like they've bitten off more than they can chew, as, despite the secrecy, word is spreading fast about Big Media's secret and extreme proposals. Citizens across the region are speaking out, with over 15,000 citizens and 30 major organizations uniting behind the Our Fair Deal Coalition, which is demanding an end to restrictive copyright proposals and a fair deal for the future of the Internet.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is also sounding the alarm, noting that Big Media's proposals mean that: "normal online activities could lead you to be cut off from the Internet, have your computer seized, be fined up to $150,000, or even land you in prison."

With talks stalled, momentum is rapidly building behind the campaign to open up the talks to citizen input. Over 23,000 have told U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman not to criminalize our Internet, with thousands more speaking out on Facebook and on Twitter.

All this citizen pressure is delivering results, with heavyweight decision-makers like U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren now demanding transparency and an open, public debate about the implications of the TPP.

Here at OpenMedia we're working closely with our international allies to open up the closed and secretive TPP process to the public. Citizen voices and the Internet community in general must be heard, and we'll be launching an exciting and positive new initiative next week to ensure they will be. Watch this space!

Remember -- Big Media lobbyists and unelected bureaucrats need you to stay silent for their plans to succeed. The Internet needs you to speak out -- do so now by joining the Our Fair Deal Coalition at http://OurFairDeal.org, and spread the word by sharing this article with your friends.

What You Need To Know About Wireless Code of Conduct
QUESTION(01 of16)
Open Image Modal
How much of the code is new? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(02 of16)
Open Image Modal
Are there any restrictions in the code that will prevent the cost of two-year contracts going up as a result of the new rules? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(03 of16)
Open Image Modal
How will the shorter contract length affect handset costs? (credit:Getty Images)
ANSWER(04 of16)
Open Image Modal
Answer from Steve Anderson, executive director of OpenMedia.ca, a wireless consumer advocacy group: It’s unclear. There’s no market reason while the cell phone companies would suddenly raise the cost of cellphone service because people are on shorter contracts. So if they do that it’s really just price gouging. They could try and raise upfront handset costs, but the Canadian companies have higher revenue per user than any other telecom companies in the world and other places where we have two-year contracts, the device cost is not higher than it is in Canada, a great example is the U.S. (Pictured: Steve Anderson of OpenMedia) (credit:OpenMedia)
ANSWER(05 of16)
Open Image Modal
Answer from Lawford: It’s call your bluff time. The CRTC is saying “let’s see if it’s true that really your costs are so high and that really you're subsidizing these devices so much, or is it that you’re locking people in so the contract is longer than the usable life of the device?” If we send people back in the market every two years is that going to make competition pick up the slack. If they all go up in lockstep, [then] the Competition Bureau should be looking into what’s going on. Pictured: John Lawford of PIAC (credit:John Lawford)
QUESTION(06 of16)
Open Image Modal
The new rules allow a fully purchased handset to be unlocked immediately or a subsidized handset to be unlocked in 90 days. What effect will this have? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(07 of16)
Open Image Modal
Are providers allowed to charge a fee to unlock a phone? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(08 of16)
Open Image Modal
What are the effects of the new rules on people who are not on a contract or already have their phones unlocked? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(09 of16)
Open Image Modal
Do the caps mean the carriers will cut off your data or roaming after a certain point? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(10 of16)
Open Image Modal
Why did the CRTC decide on two-year contracts, rather than one year, the direction the rest of the world is taking? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(11 of16)
Open Image Modal
Are the new rules on three-year contracts retroactive? Can I get out of a three-year contract today? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(12 of16)
Open Image Modal
Can a consumer use the new rules as an argument to fight an "outrageous roaming bill" they receive before they are technically protected? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(13 of16)
Open Image Modal
If you decide to get out of a three-year contract after 2 years, do you still have to pay fees like the cost of the handset? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(14 of16)
Open Image Modal
Sky high billing is the biggest concern in Canada. Why weren't rates per second and per megabyte addressed? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(15 of16)
Open Image Modal
Will providers have to show separately the handset cost consumers pay each month? (credit:Getty Images)
QUESTION(16 of16)
Open Image Modal
So is there any incentive before or after the rules come into effect in December to choose a three-year contract? (credit:Getty Images)
-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.