Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, criticized the recent Basel III requirements, which increase the minimum amount of capital that banks must keep on hand, saying the requirements will not prevent another financial crisis.
Speaking Monday at the Buttonwood Gathering in New York City, King said that despite arguments from the financial sector, the Basel III accords, which require banks to hold 6 percent of their assets in capital by 2019, set standards too low. Should crisis strike, he said, they will not provide an effective buffer.
"It's certainly a step in the right direction. But if it's a giant leap for the regulators of the world, it's only a small step for mankind," King said. "Even the new levels of capital are insufficient to prevent another crisis."
Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citigroup, who spoke after King, took a different view. Like King, he criticized Basel, saying the agreement could "make the problem worse," but he cited different reasons. By focusing only banks, Pandit said, Basel encourages risk elsewhere in the financial system. Non-bank institutions, such as insurance companies, which compose the "shadow banking system," and which don't have to follow Basel's capital requirements, will be able to make riskier trades, a phenomenon Pandit called "regulatory arbitrage." The financial system, Pandit said, could become riskier.
"Remember that the banking system is not synonymous with the financial system as a whole. And Basel only affects the former," Pandit said. "The rules don't cast a wide enough net."
In an argument that directly contradicted King's assessment, Pandit said the capital requirements on banks could turn out to be too high. Due to rules that require banks to factor in risk when calculating their capital levels, Pandit said, the actual required percentage will be higher than advertised. While the lack of regulation on non-bank institutions could increase risk, he said, an excess of regulation on banks could also pose problems.
"There is a point at which more is not necessarily better," he said, referring to capital requirements. "Double-digit ratios will have direct negative impacts on lending, capital formation, aggregate demand and growth."
But King's position challenged the banker's assumptions, as he said the capital requirements are far too low to offer any protection, and that their potential damage to growth is overblown.
"Some of the calculations of the alleged economic costs of higher capital requirements presented by the industry seem to be highly exaggerated," King said.
What's more, the process of adjusting capital requirements for risk, King said, can be murky, as risks are difficult to assess. "If only banks were playing in a casino, then we could probably calculate appropriate risk weights," he said.
Still, King supported Basel's long implementation time line, saying banks shouldn't be forced to raise capital quickly as they're undergoing a process of reducing their debt.
Pandit, for his part, concluded his speech by saying Basel creates a false and dangerous sense of safety. He suggested that policymakers continue the debate on Basel, just as they debated the Dodd-Frank financial reform.
"By creating an illusion of safety, Basel actually dulls the sense of urgency," he said. "In many respects, particularly on higher capital, Basel is headed in the right direction. In other respects, Basel is making the problem worse."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.