This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

Are American Voters Trumped Both Ways?

How is anyone to believe that either candidate will deal with the deeply-rooted problems of America today: income disparities, the legal corruption of political donations, a warming globe that needs to be cooled, crony capitalism that has harmed so much of the American middle class? Add to this the ultimate problem: an uncanny tendency to deal with all these fires by repeatedly pouring oil on them.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Open Image Modal
Jim Urquhart / Reuters
A combination photo shows U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (L) and Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump (R) in Los Angeles, California on May 5, 2016 and in Eugene, Oregon, U.S. on May 6, 2016 respectively. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson (L) and Jim Urquhart/File Photos

Co-authored with John Breitner

One of us is American and the other Canadian, one conservative, the other liberal. We live in Canada, a good vantage whence to watch the in U.S. election. Where, we wish to ask, are the good folks of America, in politics and in the population? In the population, they appear to be marginalized by a choice between one politician who is selling snake oil, 21st-century style, and another who epitomizes the establishment that many of them abhor -- business as usual.

Donald Trump gives voice to many Americans who know that they are getting bamboozled. Yet here is the ultimate hustler, the very type who does so much of the bamboozling. Trust me, he says. Hillary Clinton gives voice to many who appreciate how dangerous her opponent could be. Trust me, she too says, while offering a steady stream of reasons why people cannot. Sure we all have our flaws, but among 320 million Americans, could two not be found with flaws that reveal an underlying integrity?

How is anyone to believe that either candidate will deal with the deeply-rooted problems of America today: income disparities, the legal corruption of political donations, a warming globe that needs to be cooled, crony capitalism that has harmed so much of the American middle class? Add to this the ultimate problem: an uncanny tendency to deal with all these fires by repeatedly pouring oil on them.

When two people engage in a battle, both can look bad, even though one may have been worse.

How, exactly, will the hotshot with the checkered background, who promises to "make America great again," do that? How will the archetype of the American establishment challenge that establishment? And how will either of these two, who used to socialize together as members of the one per cent, improve the lot of the 99 per cent?

Americans have been hearing the "trust me" line for centuries. Lincoln famously claimed that you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Maybe so, but it appears that you can fool many of the people much of the time because, to quote P.T. Barnum, a sucker is born every minute. So, evidently, is a shark. Ask the contractors and workers of Atlantic City who sued the Donald for reneging on his contracts.

Trump, of course, also offers business as usual -- in his case, quite literally. I'm a businessman, he says. I can do it. We've heard that before too. Even if we leave aside that government is not business, even if we ignore the record of so much of today's business as usual -- all the lobbying, pay-to-play donations, corporate social irresponsibility, and the obscenity of executive compensation -- we still have to ask what kind of a businessman is Donald Trump anyway? Was he serious when he offered to renegotiate the U.S. federal debt to solve the deficit problem? Or when he asked that an American-born judge of Mexican descent be recused from hearing complaints about his infamous "Trump University"?

What, then, are the good folks of America to do? When two people engage in a battle, both can look bad, even though one may have been worse. They drag each other down. No one should be fooled by this. We believe that the calculus of the U.S. election is quite simple. The flaws of these two candidates hardly deserve the equal attention they are getting in some of the correct media. One is flawed, but the other could be fatally flawed. Business as usual may be intolerable, but snake oil for the ills of this world is downright hazardous. What Donald Trump would do as president is anyone's guess; what Hillary Clinton would do is not.

So the American among us will hold his nose and vote Democratic. Then both of us will take a deep breath and contemplate the bigger issue: how can good folks save democracy from itself? We urge you to do likewise.

Henry Mintzberg is Cleghorn Professor of Management Studies in the Desautels Faculty of Management at McGill University and John Breitner is Director of the Center for Studies on Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease at the Douglas Hospital Research Center and Professor of Psychiatry in the McGill Faculty of Medicine.

Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook

ALSO ON HUFFPOST:

Republicans Who Have Refused To Back Donald Trump
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney(01 of17)
Open Image Modal
"I simply can’t put my name down as someone who voted for principles that suggest racism or xenophobia, misogyny, bigotry, [for someone] who’s been vulgar time and time again,” Romney said in June. “I don’t want to be associated with that in any way, shape or form.” (credit:Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Sen. Ben Sasse (Neb.)(02 of17)
Open Image Modal
"I’m as frustrated and saddened as you are about what’s happening to our country. But I cannot support Donald Trump," he wrote in February. (credit:SAUL LOEB via Getty Images)
Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson(03 of17)
Open Image Modal
“When it comes to the presidency, I will not vote for Donald Trump,” Paulson, who served as Treasury secretary under George W. Bush, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed in June. (credit:Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush(04 of17)
Open Image Modal
“Donald Trump has not demonstrated that temperament or strength of character. He has not displayed a respect for the Constitution. And, he is not a consistent conservative. These are all reasons why I cannot support his candidacy,” Bush wrote in a Facebook post in May. (credit:Mark Makela via Getty Images)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.)(05 of17)
Open Image Modal
The South Carolina senator told CNN in May he would not vote for Trump or Clinton in September.

"I don't believe that Donald Trump has the temperament and judgment to be commander in chief. I think Donald Trump is going to places where very few people have gone and I'm not going with him," he said.
(credit:Tom Williams via Getty Images)
Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage(06 of17)
Open Image Modal
“If Donald Trump is the nominee, I would vote for Hillary Clinton,” Armitage told Politico in June. "He doesn't appear to be a Republican, he doesn't appear to want to learn about issues. So, I’m going to vote for Mrs. Clinton.”
(credit:BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI via Getty Images)
Former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft(07 of17)
Open Image Modal
“Secretary Clinton shares my belief that America must remain the world’s indispensable leader. She understands that our leadership and engagement beyond our borders makes the world, and therefore the United States more secure and prosperous,” he said in a statement. (credit:Mark Wilson via Getty Images)
Sen. Mark Kirk (Ill.)(08 of17)
Open Image Modal
Earlier this month, the Illinois Republican, who is locked in a tough re-election battle, rescinded his endorsement of Trump. He is also running ads against Trump.

"I cannot and will not support my party’s nominee for President,” he said.
(credit:Bill Clark via Getty Images)
Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.)(09 of17)
Open Image Modal
“As of now, unless he changes significantly, I can’t see myself voting for Donald Trump,” Flake said in June. (credit:Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Rep. Bob Dold (Ill.)(10 of17)
Open Image Modal
"For me, I will not support Donald Trump. Certainly I think there are others that have some pretty significant reservations," the Illinois congressman told WLS in May. “I want to make that I’m clear about this, I’m not going to support Hillary Clinton either. I would write someone in.” (credit:Tom Williams via Getty Images)
Rep. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.)(11 of17)
Open Image Modal
“I have no plans of supporting either of the presumptive nominees," he told the Miami Herald in May. (credit:Tom Williams via Getty Images)
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.)(12 of17)
Open Image Modal
“"In this election, I do not support either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton," Ros-Lehtinen told the Miami Herald in May. (credit:Bill Clark via Getty Images)
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine)(13 of17)
Open Image Modal
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said in August she could not vote for Trump because he "does not reflect historical Republican values, nor the inclusive approach to governing that is critical to healing the divisions in our country." (credit:Yuri Gripas / Reuters)
Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.)(14 of17)
Open Image Modal
Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) has said he can’t envision himself voting for Trump at this time. “I’ll give him a chance, but at this point, I have no intentions of voting for him,” he said in June. (REUTERS/Enrique de la Osa) (credit:Enrique de la Osa / Reuters)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)(15 of17)
Open Image Modal
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has not said explicitly that he would not vote for Trump. But in a speech at the GOP convention in Cleveland last month, Cruz urged delegates to vote their conscience “up and down the ticket,” signaling his opposition to the nominee. (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst) (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah)(16 of17)
Open Image Modal
Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) has not offered his endorsement yet. While he has signaled his obvious displeasure ― earlier this year he said Trump scared him “to death” ― he could come around in the future if he “heard the right things out of him.” (REUTERS/Carlo Allegri) (credit:Carlo Allegri / Reuters)
Former Under Secretary Of State For Public Diplomacy James Glassman,(17 of17)
Open Image Modal
Glassman, who served as under secretary of state for public diplomacy to President George W. Bush said Hillary Clinton was “by far the superior candidate." (credit:ASSOCIATED PRESS)
-- This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.