The question was certainly straightforward enough. The answer, though -- the answer left a few threads hanging.
Of course, since the man providing the answer was one Richard B. Cheney, former veep of these United States, you have to expect the occasional bit of obfuscation, misdirection, even on a Sunday morning. After all, if Dick Cheney told us everything, he'd have to kill us. (And he wouldn't lose a minute's sleep over it either.)
Still, it was an answer that only raised more questions.
This is last Sunday on Face the Nation, and CBS's Bob Schieffer is pressing Cheney about the "enhanced interrogation techniques" that were used on certain ostensibly high-value prisoners in U.S. custody. (You can call it "torture" if you like. Everybody with a half-decent dictionary does -- a rather large group that apparently doesn't include Cheney.)
Anyway, at one point in the interview, according to CBS's own transcript, the conversation goes this way:
SCHIEFFER: How much did President Bush know specifically about the methods that were being used? We know that you -- and you have said -- that you approved this...
CHENEY: Right.
SCHIEFFER: ... somewhere down the line. Did President Bush know everything you knew?
As I said, a pretty straightforward question. But the answer? Not so much.
CHENEY: I certainly, yes, have every reason to believe he knew -- he knew a great deal about the program. He basically authorized it. I mean, this was a presidential-level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed off on it.
"Basically"?! The president "basically" authorized it?! He knew "a great deal" about the program?!
It was "a presidential-level decision" that "went to the president"?! And he "signed off on it"?!
That's it?! That's as much as George Bush was involved in one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency?! (It was, technically speaking, his presidency, even if Cheney and Cheney's people tended to ignore that fact when it was more convenient to pretend otherwise.)
Now, there are at least two ways to read Cheney's response. One, that he's trying to keep his former boss -- even to say the word is to laugh -- out of the line of fire. "Plausible deniability" and all that.
Or two, that Cheney's trying to show -- without giving too much away, of course -- that, despite all the rumors to the contrary, he wasn't a totally loose cannon, that everything he did had the president's approval. More or less.
But then there's the third, even more chilling, possibility: that Cheney is being, in his fashion, accurate. Even precise. That George Bush "basically" authorized the torture program -- but no more than "basically." That he knew "a great deal" about the program -- but not everything. (What about the nasty bits? Was he told about the nasty bits?) That this "presidential-level decision" in fact "went to the president," who "signed off on it" -- but did he realize what he was signing? Did he understand its implications?
On those questions, Cheney leaves us -- yet again -- in the dark. But we're certainly free to wonder: What did George Bush know, and how well did he know it? After all, how many times did those lovable cut-ups on M*A*S*H trick their hapless commander into signing something he should never have signed? A line of snappy patter, a pile of distracting documents, a quick application of emotional blackmail -- they were all in the toolkit for putting one over on the big guy.
You don't think that George Bush was at least that hapless in real life? Or that Dick Cheney was at least that resourceful?
Call it the Bush-Cheney administration if you insist, but you're twisting -- torturing? -- the facts. All the evidence suggests that when it really mattered, it was the other way around.
Rick Horowitz is a syndicated columnist. You can write to him at rickhoro@execpc.com.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.