While voting members of the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences are busy poring through submissions for this year's potential Emmy Award nominees, here are my thoughts about which shows and actors should be nominated in the drama series categories, as well as my picks for the winners. It's always very satisfying to assemble such lists, if only to acknowledge the best of the best, but it can also be quite challenging. This is such an extraordinary time for television content that it is often near impossible to select only six nominees in each category, the maximum number allowed in the Emmy nomination process.
As always, the shows and actors named here represent one man's opinion. If you think there are any glaring omissions, please make them known in the comments section.
Outstanding Drama Series: AMC's Breaking Bad, PBS' Downton Abbey, CBS's The Good Wife, Showtime's Homeland, FX's Justified, AMC's Mad Men.
Also worth consideration: HBO's Boardwalk Empire, HBO's Game of Thrones, FX's Sons of Anarchy, TNT's Southland.
My personal choice in this category would be Breaking Bad, a series as dark and unsparing as any ever produced for American television and an extraordinary showcase for some of the finest acting in the medium. But a fifth consecutive win for Mad Men would be perfectly fine, as well. Many critics thought Men slipped a bit in its fifth season; my only complaint was that we didn't get enough of the former Betty Draper, one of the most consistently fascinating characters on television, and also one of the truest.
One might say that Downton Abbey deserves the top honor because it was a genuine phenomenon that brought millions of viewers to PBS and introduced a new generation of young people to period drama. (One might also assert that Abbey is a miniseries rather than an ongoing series, and thus does not belong in this category, but such decisions are out of our hands.) Many people will complain about my decision to exclude Game of Thrones from my primary contenders, but that's only because season two wasn't as focused as season one. Similarly, it can be argued that Sons of Anarchy had its strongest season yet and may be more deserving of a nomination than Justified, but I just can't bring myself to make that switch. I'll be good with their decision if Academy members do.
Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series: Steve Buscemi, HBO's Boardwalk Empire; Bryan Cranston, AMC's Breaking Bad; Kelsey Grammer, Starz' Boss; Jon Hamm, AMC's Mad Men; Damian Lewis, Showtime's Homeland; Timothy Olyphant, FX's Justified.
Also worth consideration: Michael C. Hall, Showtime's Dexter; Dustin Hoffman, HBO's Luck; Charlie Hunnam, FX's Sons of Anarchy; Hugh Laurie, Fox's House; Matt Smith, BBC America's Doctor Who.
Bryan Cranston already has three Emmys for his fascinating portrayal of terminally ill chemistry teacher turned drug lord Walter White. There is no reason to believe he won't collect a fourth this year, unless the Academy chooses to honor Kelsey Grammer for taking on a pay-cable role that is so all-consuming it actually overrides memories of his iconic portrayal of the pompous Dr. Frasier Crane on two classic broadcast comedies.
Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series: Glenn Close, DirecTV's Damages; Claire Danes, Showtime's Homeland; Julianna Margulies, CBS's The Good Wife; Elisabeth Moss, AMC's Mad Men; Katey Sagal, FX's Sons of Anarchy; Kyra Sedgwick, TNT's The Closer.
Also worth consideration: Kathy Bates, NBC's Harry's Law; Michelle Dockery, PBS' Downton Abbey; Mireille Enos, AMC's Mad Men; Emmy Rossum, Showtime's Shameless.
This is one of those circumstances in which no discussion is necessary. Every one of these women was simply extraordinary, including those who didn't make my primary list, but Claire Danes will be nominated and she will win. (P.S. I believe Danes' primary competitor next year in this category will be Chloe Sevigny of DirecTV's profoundly engrossing drama about a transgender killer for hire, Hit & Miss.)
This column continues over on MediaPost.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.