Five days after he was called "not a simple villain" by a Dec. 21 op-ed in the Washington Post for a recently released 1973 recording of him telling then-President Richard Nixon that Soviets gassing Jews was a humanitarian, not an American, problem, Henry Kissinger penned his own op-ed in the Post.
Reminding readers that he lost many family members in the Holocaust, the former secretary of state said it has been "hurtful" to see his comments taken out of context. "References to gas chambers have no place in political discourse, and I am sorry I made that remark 37 years ago," Kissinger wrote.
The recording and Kissinger's response have generated a good deal of media buzz -- a search for Kissinger and Nixon on Google News yields about 200 items -- but the discussions have been largely political and have ignored an interesting art angle to the story.
In 1979, Jerelle Kraus, art director of the op-ed page of the New York Times asked painter and long time New York Review of Books caricaturist David Levine to submit a drawing to accompany a piece by William Pfaff accusing Kissinger of war crimes.
Levine's submission, which takes up half a page on the first page of the first chapter of Kraus' book, All the Art That's Fit to Print (& Some That Wasn't): Inside The New York Times Op-Ed Page, showed the secretary of state with his tattooed back turned to the viewer.
"Tattooed on the diplomat's back are hallmarks of his career," noted Kraus. "Shoulder hairs become Arabic script, bombs fall on Cambodia, and Vietnam darkens; 'Richard' shares forearm billing with 'Mother'; and the shah of Iran and a Chinese dragon adorn the cheeks."
Kraus, who says the Times' op-ed page "prefigured" the blogosphere by three decades by inviting non-staffers to submit content, figured the op-ed editor Charlotte Curtis would allow Levine's drawing, because it was not nearly as critical as Pfaff's copy. She was wrong. After Curtis cut the drawing, the most Kraus could do was instruct the bookkeeper to cut Levine a full check, rather than the standard half-price "kill" fee.
"No book had been written about op-ed's 40-year history, let alone its groundbreaking art," Kraus says, explaining why she wrote the book.
Another artist included in the book is Mark Podwal, who started drawing for the Times' op-ed page in 1972 and who has illustrated many of Elie Wiesel's books.
Podwal stresses that Levine was not identifying Kissinger as anti-Jewish.
"None of the tattoos indicate anti-Semitism," Podwal says. "I don't interpret Kissinger's remark as anti-Semitic. It appears that to Kissinger it did not matter which of its countrymen the Russians were to gas. Kissinger is the ultimate opportunist willing to say anything to Nixon to confirm loyalty."
Podwal is unconvinced by Kissinger's apology. "To me, Kissinger's words and Levine's drawing both underscore how Kissinger had sold his soul to Nixon," he says.
Kraus agrees. "Kissinger is a lackey willing to sell out to his anti-Semitic boss. His apology is an elaborate defense that doesn't convey his eagerness, in a pinch, to mouth political expediencies," she says. "I don't accept the apology, since it's constructed over three decades after his utterances, and the person to whom he spoke, Nixon, isn't here to give his reaction."
Levine "despised" Kissinger, "whom he knew to be a hypocrite," she adds, but no one, Levine included, could have imagined that he would stoop so low as to say what he did about gassing Jews in Russia.
"Through Levine's drawing, we witness that once the outer layers of Kissinger's 'diplomacy' are peeled off, the naked truth is revealed," she says.
Image credit: David Levine, as published in All the Art That's Fit to Print (& Some That Wasn't): Inside The New York Times Op-Ed Page, courtesy of Jerelle Kraus.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.