Why Monsanto Just Rejected A $62 Billion Mega-Merger Offer

The widely reviled seed and pesticide giant thinks it's worth more money.
|
Open Image Modal
Reuters

Monsanto wants more green.

The seed and pesticide giant on Tuesday rejected a $62 billion bid from German conglomerate Bayer, but said it would be open to a bigger offer. In a statement, the company said its board of director's unanimously voted against the unsolicited proposal, which it deemed "incomplete and financially inadequate."

“We believe in the substantial benefits an integrated strategy could provide to growers and broader society, and we have long respected Bayer’s business,” Hugh Grant, Monsanto's chairman and chief executive, said in the statement. “However, the current proposal significantly undervalues our company and also does not adequately address or provide reassurance for some of the potential financing and regulatory execution risks related to the acquisition.”

Open Image Modal
Shares of Monsanto spiked by about 3 percent after its widely expected rejection of Bayer's initial bid.
Google Finance

The rejection comes as no surprise. The offer -- which would be the biggest takeover ever attempted by a German company -- comes amid rapid consolidation in the agricultural chemicals industry. And generous as it seems, it falls flat compared to other landmark deals.

Last December, Dow Chemical and DuPont agreed to a $130 billion merger, after which the companies are expected to split into three separate businesses, including one focused on seeds and crop sprays, according to the Financial Times. Then, in February, Swiss competitor Syngenta agreed to a $43 billion takeover by the China National Chemical Corp., or ChemChina. The deal came just months after Syngenta rejected for the fourth time a $47 billion bid from Monsanto. 

So in a reversal, the predator became prey. Monsanto is unlikely to go down for less than it offered its former target. 

 

Bayer's bid for Monsanto appears big, but as The Wall Street Journal's Helen Thomas pointed out on Monday, the offer isn't as juicy as the one that wooed Syngenta to its Chinese state-owned rival:

At 15.8 times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, Bayer’s offer is hardly stingy. But it also falls short of the knock-out 17 times that ChemChina paid for Syngenta.

Bayer did not respond to a request for comment on the failed bid. 

The merger may be a hard sell to investors. Many of Bayer's shareholders are focused on the company's pharmaceutical business, and may view Monsanto's agrichemical empire with suspicion. The eye-popping offer also came less than one month into Werner Baumann's newly minted tenure as Bayer's chief executive.

“We have struggled to find investors who favour this transaction,” Alistair Campbell, an analyst at Berenberg, told the Financial Times in a profile of Baumann last week. “We think a bid for Monsanto will be expensive, [earnings] dilutive and destroy value.”

Still, Monsanto may be vulnerable to a hostile takeover if Bayer commits the resources to a higher offer.

The company, reviled by environmentalists for its aggressive pushing of genetically modified crops and toxic pesticides, has struggled over the past year, despite recent studies backing its claim that GMOs are safe to eat. A shortlist of those woes includes: 

  • In January, the company laid off a total of 3,600 employees, or about 16 percent of its workforce.

  • In February, Swiss competitor Syngenta agreed to the China National Chemical Corp.’s acquisition offer, just months after refusing for a fourth time to sell itself to Monsanto. 

  • In March, the maker of RoundUp weed killer slashed its earnings forecast for the year amid economic headwinds from low commodity prices.

  • Earlier this month, two of the largest U.S. grain traders refused to buy a new type of Monsanto’s genetically modified soybean because European Union regulators have yet to approve it.

  • The firm is locked in ongoing disputes over seed royalties in Argentina and India.

  • Its stock price has fallen by as much as 31 percent in the past 12 months, according to Bloomberg.

“It’s a relentless string of bad news,” Jonas Oxgaard, an analyst at the research firm Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., told Bloomberg News last week. “It’s almost like they forgot to sacrifice a goat to the gods.” 

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Can These GMO Foods Save the World?
Drought-Tolerant Corn(01 of05)
Open Image Modal
This one has some obvious benefits: researches have been able to engineer a breed of corn that can survive long periods of water deprivation. A couple different varieties are on the market and already in use, and the one sold by Monsanto, called DroughtGard, added the same gene that bacteria use to continue growing in cold environments. Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ ThinkstockClick Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the World
Blight-Resistant Potatoes(02 of05)
Open Image Modal
Late blight has long been the bane of potato farmers’ existence; the fungus-like pathogen was responsible for the Irish potato harvest being decimated in the 1800s. Ireland’s agricultural agency, Teagasc, has been hard at work developing a potato that’s been genetically modified to resist blight, and once it’s tested and approved, it could do away with the plague that destroys about a fifth of the world’s annual potato harvest. Photo Credit: Liquidlibrary/ Thinkstock
Virus-Resistant Papaya(03 of05)
Open Image Modal
Papaya ringspot virus has historically seriously lowered yields of papaya crops, and throughout the 1990s researchers worked to develop a cultivar that was resistant to it. In 1999 the first virus-resistant papayas were grown in Hawaii (they elicit an immune-like response to the virus), and today they’re approved for consumption in both the U.S. and Canada. Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ ThinkstockClick Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the World
Insect-Resistant Eggplant(04 of05)
Open Image Modal
The Bt bacteria has also been effectively worked into the DNA of eggplant, which sees up to 40 percent of yearly crop loss due to a pest called the “fruit and shoot borer.” The natural insecticide has been found to be non-toxic to fish, chickens, rabbits, goats, rats, and cattle.Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock
Virus-Resistant Squash(05 of05)
Open Image Modal
The second GE crop to be cleared by U.S. regulators (after papaya), a breed of squash called Freedom II was engineered to be resistant to two viruses. Today six varieties of virus-resistant squash and zucchini are being sold in the U.S. Click Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the WorldPhoto Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock