Los AngelesVideo

Residential Parking Meters In Santa Monica Proposed To Raise Money, Discourage Residential Parking (VIDEO)

NOOO: Residential Parking Meters
|

Are you the kind of driver who looks for sidestreet parking rather than pay at a main street parking meter? That may no longer be a cost-saving option, at least not in Santa Monica, Calif.

Santa Monica city officials are exploring a pilot program that would add parking meters to some residential streets near commercial streets, the Santa Monica Daily Press reports. Residents with preferential parking permits would not have to pay the meters.

Officials hope that, in addition to raising money for the city, the residential meters will discourage parking on side streets -- which has forced residents to park three or four blocks from their homes.

The program would place 350 new meters on side streets of commercial corridors like Wilshire, Santa Monica or Lincoln boulevards, CBS reports.

But there's concern that the meters might actually encourage more parking, would be eye sores and would result in less spots because meters would take up curb space with marked spots that fit both SUVs and Smartcars, notes SMDP.

“It would just be really inconvenient for our guests to come down here ... they’d have to pay every two hours,” resident Carla Stangle said to CBS. “The city already makes so much money in parking tickets and meters, I don’t think there’s need for any more."

"This is a horrible, horrible idea," Gail Suber commented on the Daily Press story. "Ten cents used to get us 12 minutes and now it's only six minutes. And they also cut the time limit for parking in downtown structures from two hours to 1.5 hours. Give us a break."

This isn't the first time Santa Monica's parking changes have drawn the ire of locals. The city recently installed ground sensors and new meters at all of its metered parking spaces so that they no longer accept payment after the indicated time limit. This means drivers can no longer run back and "feed" the meter to stay parked over the allotted time limit. The smart meters also wipe the slate clean after every car leaves, which means new drivers can no longer stumble upon a meter with minutes left on it.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Cities With The Worst Traffic: 24/7 Wall St.
10. Boston(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 14.7> Population density: 1,305.4 people per sq. mile (9th highest)> Average commute time: 29.2 minutes (tied for 10th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 76.6% (8th lowest)It took commuters in Boston 14.7% longer to travel during peak hours than it would without traffic in 2012. This is more than double the nationwide congestion level. Among the major reasons for this was Interstate 93, three stretches of which ranked among the 50 most congested corridors in the nation. The interstate was rerouted from an elevated highway running above Boston to a tunnel running below the city as part of the area’s famous “Big Dig” project, which ran billions of dollars over budget and took decades to finish.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="15" data-vars-position-in-unit="19">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8250578@N06/4563300953" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Dave Lindblom" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8250578@N06/4563300953" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="16" data-vars-position-in-unit="20">Dave Lindblom</a>)
9. Washington D.C.(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 16.4> Population density: 997.1 people per sq. mile (18th highest)> Average commute time: 34.5 minutes (2nd highest)> Pct. driving to work: 76% (6th lowest)Just 76% of all Washington D.C. area commuters used a private vehicle to get to work in 2011, less than nearly all other large metropolitan areas. And as many as 14.8% of commuters used public transit — among the most in the nation. But with the Washington area among the nation’s most congested, the average commute time to work was 34.5 minutes — behind only the New York metro area. Traffic congestion did improve in 2012, when the city received a congestion score of 16.4 — down from 19.9 the year before. The lower score indicates that drivers are traveling closer to “free flow” speed during peak hours, even as large stretches of Interstate 95 and the Capital Beltway ranked among the worst congestion corridors in the nation.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:WikiMedia:)
8. Seattle(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 17.6 (tied for 7th highest)> Population density: 585.8 people per sq. mile (35th highest)> Average commute time: 27.6 minutes (22nd highest)> Pct. driving to work: 81% (20th lowest)Congestion in Seattle actually improved in 2012, with the INRIX index score declining from 19.6 in 2011 to 17.6 last year. Despite this improvement, Seattle remains one of the most congested metro areas in the nation and had some of the most congested individual roads in the country in 2012. Among these was a nine-mile, southbound stretch of Interstate 5, which ranked as the 11th most congested corridor in the nation in 2012. Last March, The Seattle Times noted that new tolls on the nearby Highway 520 had led to increased congestion on Interstate 5.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="11" data-vars-position-in-unit="15">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/21683557@N00/8505399399" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Dave Sizer" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/21683557@N00/8505399399" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="12" data-vars-position-in-unit="16">Dave Sizer</a>)
7. San Jose(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 17.6 (tied for 7th highest)> Population density: 685.7 people per sq. mile (26th highest)> Average commute time: 24.8 minutes (65th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 86.7% (61st lowest)Only one stretch of road in the San Jose area ranked in the top 100 most congested in the nation in 2012. Despite this, overall congestion in the area was among the nation’s worst last year, receiving an INRIX index a score of 17.6. Additionally, the San Jose area’s score actually worsened in 2012 compared to 2011, even as the nationwide congestion score improved from 8.4 to 6.6. San Jose residents were roughly as likely as most Americans to drive to work, according to Census figures.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:AP)
6. Bridgeport(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 19.1> Population density: 1,467.2 people per sq. mile (6th highest)> Average commute time: 28.3 minutes (18th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 82.2% (29th lowest)The worst traffic in the Bridgeport, Conn., metropolitan area — which serves for many of the state’s commuters as a gateway to the New York metro area — was on a 22.2 mile stretch of Interstate 95 during the evening rush hour. Without traffic, it would take a driver 21 minutes to complete the stretch. During the week’s evening rush hour, it would take 44 minutes to complete that drive. The Bridgeport metro area had one of the highest population densities in the nation when measured by the 2010 Census.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="7" data-vars-position-in-unit="11">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36813960@N00/523148895" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="jblyberg" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36813960@N00/523148895" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="8" data-vars-position-in-unit="12">jblyberg</a>)
5. New York(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 19.9> Population density: 2,826 people per sq. mile (the highest)> Average commute time: 34.9 minutes (the highest)> Pct. driving to work: 56.6% (the lowest)With 2,896 people per square mile in 2010, New York had the highest population density of any metro area in America. That year, nearly 19 million people lived either in New York or the surrounding towns and cities, and many of them made long commutes to work daily. The average travel time to work in 2011 was nearly 35 minutes, the most of any metro area in the nation. New York ranked among the most congested metro areas despite more residents using public transit to get to work and fewer residents using cars than anywhere else in the nation. Four of the 10 worst congested corridors in America last year were located in New York, including the nation’s worst: an 11.3 mile stretch of the Cross Bronx Expressway.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Shutterstock)
4. Austin(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 20.7> Population density: 406.7 people per sq. mile (70th highest)> Average commute time: 25.8 minutes (45th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 85.8% (47th lowest)No metro area with more than a million residents had a greater percentage increase in population from July 1, 2011, and July 1, 2012, than Austin’s 3% growth, according to the Austin Statesman. This is hardly news for the area, which has expanded rapidly for more than a decade and, like much of the state, has been unable to expand transportation infrastructure to handle this growth. In 2012, Austin was one of four metro areas with an INRIX index score higher than 20, well above the 6.6 score for the U.S. overall. It was also one of just six large metro areas in which the INRIX index score worsened compared to the year before.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="3" data-vars-position-in-unit="7">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11271562@N00/8235462777" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="aaronstrout" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5be2c330e4b028402f7dc517" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11271562@N00/8235462777" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="4" data-vars-position-in-unit="8">aaronstrout</a>)
3. San Francisco(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 23.5> Population density: 1,754.8 people per sq. mile (3rd highest)> Average commute time: 29.2 minutes (tied for 10th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 71.4% (3rd lowest)As many as 14.6% of workers in San Francisco took public transit to work in 2011, the third-highest rate of any metro area in the nation. Additionally, just 71.4% used a car, truck or van to get to work, the third-lowest percentage in the U.S. But despite the high public transit use, the area remained highly congested. Likely contributing to its high congestion is the area’s high density. The San Francisco area had the nation’s third-highest population density in 2010, with just under 1,755 people per square mile — behind only the New York and Los Angeles metro areas. In late 2010, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority decided to study whether charges would discourage drivers from traveling by car through highly congested areas during peak hours. A decision on implementing such charges has yet to be reached.Read more: Ten Cities with the Worst Traffic - 24/7 Wall St. http://247wallst.com/2013/05/01/ten-cities-with-the-worst-traffic/#ixzz2SMHsyHX4 (credit:Shutterstock)
2. Honolulu(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 26.0> Population density: 1,586.7 people per sq. mile (5th highest)> Average commute time: 27 minutes (27th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 79.5% (14th lowest)Honolulu is one of the densest metro areas in the nation, with more than 1,586 people per square mile, as of 2010. Commuters were also considerably less likely to get to work by car, truck or van than most Americans, and were far more likely to walk or use public transit. Although just two Honolulu road segments, barely totaling 11 miles, were among the nation’s 100 most congested corridors in 2012, the area still ranked exceptionally poorly. However, the city’s congestion score improved from 2011, when it had the worst levels in the country. After years of planning and delays, Honolulu broke ground on a massive public rail transit project in 2011. The project has long been controversial due to its environmental impact, cost and the possibility of disturbing the burial sites of Native Hawaiians’ ancestors.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:WikiMedia:)
1. Los Angeles(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Congestion score: 28.8> Population density: 2,646.0 people per sq. mile (2nd highest)> Average commute time: 28.6 minutes (15th highest)> Pct. driving to work: 84.1% (38th lowest)After being replaced by Honolulu for a year, Los Angeles once again earned the title of the most congested metro area in the country. In 2012, on a Friday at 5:00 p.m., the average driver wasted more than 28 minutes in traffic. Four of the 10 most congested corridors last year were in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The worst is an eight-mile stretch on Interstate 405. Los Angeles also had the second highest population density of any metro area in 2010, behind only New York, at 2,646 people per square mile. Only these two metro areas exceeded 2,000 people per square mile that year. However, in Los Angeles, commuters were far less likely to get to work via public transportation. In 2011, just 6.2% of area workers took public transit to work, versus 31.1% in the New York area.Read more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:AP)
Suggest a correction
|
Submit a tip