IMF Says Sequester Hurting U.S. Economy, Delaying Recovery

IMF Sounds Alarm About Sequestration
|
Open Image Modal
Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), pauses while speaking at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Monday, Sept. 24, 2012. Lagarde urged European policy makers to implement their plans to save the euro, including the formation of a banking union, as the fund prepares to lower its global growth forecasts. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

As much as half of U.S. economic growth this year has been slashed due to tax increases and indiscriminate federal spending cuts known as sequestration, according to a sobering new forecast by the International Monetary Fund, which urged lawmakers to repeal the cuts.

Risks to U.S. growth are "modestly tilted to the downside," the IMF said in its annual report on the nation's economy, as a reduction of $85 billion in government expenditures this year due to sequestration has dampened demand and investment, just as tax hikes have taken a big bite out of U.S. paychecks and reduced household spending.

The IMF estimates growth of just 1.9 percent this year, as Managing Director Christine Lagarde said "very significant" decreases in federal spending and higher taxes may have reduced growth by up to 1.75 percentage points.

The meager recovery in turn may delay a rebound in the U.S. labor market and reduce long-term growth, as unemployed workers lose skills and become so discouraged they stop looking for work. About one in seven American workers can't find full-time jobs, according to the Labor Department.

"The sequester cuts not only reduced growth in the short term, but they also hurt the most vulnerable and they produce very undesirable effects in that regard," Lagarde said.

The Obama administration and some in Congress have been trying to replace sequestration, $1.2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, with something more targeted and gradual. The IMF seemed to endorse that approach.

“[T]he indiscriminate reductions in education, science, and infrastructure spending could also reduce medium-term potential growth,” the IMF warned. Instead, it called for policies such as increased job training programs and closer ties between community colleges and employers.

But the sudden reduction in the U.S. government's annual budget deficit appears to have pleased many Washington policymakers, who over the past few years have seemed to embrace austerity policies in favor of initiatives to jumpstart growth and increase job creation.

The Congressional Budget Office said in May that the U.S. budget deficit is forecast to fall this year to $642 billion, down from $1.1 trillion in 2012. The rapid decline surprised officials, especially as the CBO forecast nearly a $850 billion deficit for 2013 in February.

The IMF said that deficit reduction this year has been “excessively rapid and ill-designed.”

“A slower pace of deficit reduction would help the recovery,” the IMF said, particularly considering that the Federal Reserve’s aggressive efforts to jumpstart growth by reducing borrowing costs “has limited room to support it further.”

The Fund appeared to endorse the White House’s budget proposal, which calls for reductions in long-term entitlement spending and more tax revenues. It said that healthcare costs and government pension schemes such as Social Security are due to increase the federal government’s expenditures in future years, so measures are needed now to tame the expected rise in spending.

Separately, the IMF warned that the Fed’s extraordinary efforts may lead to excessive risk-taking by financial institutions and investors, who have been starved for high-yielding investments as interest rates have hovered near record lows for nearly five years. The Fed and other policymakers are already aware of this risk, and say they have increased their surveillance of the financial system to guard against destabilizing risk-taking.

Lagarde also said that as government fiscal policy hampers growth, "the private sector is leading." Home prices have been rising, construction is up, households have been repairing their balance sheets and corporate profitability is near record highs.

The IMF said the U.S. government should further support the housing market, despite recent improvements, by stimulating increased home mortgage refinancings.

It suggested that a government refinance initiative, known as the Home Affordable Refinance Program, be extended to non-government backed loans. The Obama administration has been pushing a similar proposal, though it has languished in Congress.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

10 Ways The U.S. Is Getting Worse For Most Americans
Workers are not reaping the gains of their extra productivity.(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
Worker productivity grew 11 times more quickly than worker pay between 1979 and 2011: While worker productivity rose 69 percent, median hourly compensation rose just 6.5 percent, according to the Economic Policy Institute.[Chart credit: Economic Policy Institute] (credit:Economic Policy Institute)
CEO pay has skyrocketed.(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
Maybe it's time to consider your CEO's massive pay package as a cut out of your own paycheck. CEO pay is more than 200 times that of a typical worker, up from 30 times that of a typical worker in the late 1970s, according to the Economic Policy Institute. (credit:AP)
There aren't enough jobs.(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
At its current rate of job creation, the U.S. will not return to its pre-recession unemployment rate of around 5 percent before 2020, according to the Economic Policy Institute. (credit:AP)
Job growth was slow even before the recession.(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
From the Economic Policy Institute: "The business cycle from 2000-2007 is the weakest full business cycle on record for job creation, due to the fact that demand was insufficient to drive overall GDP gains that were robust enough to generate strong job growth."It appears that the middle class squeeze has hurt job creation and economic growth. (credit:AP)
We are poorer than we could be.(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
Households in the middle fifth of income distribution would have been making $18,897 more per year as of 2007 if their incomes had grown as quickly as overall average incomes between 1979 and 2007, according to the Economic Policy Institute. (The sizable income growth for top earners since 1979 skewed the overall average.) (credit:The Huffington Post)
The rich have captured most income growth.(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
The top one percent captured 60 percent of total income growth between 1979 and 2007, while the bottom 90 percent was left with just 9 percent of the total, according to the Economic Policy Institute. Moreover, the top one percent's incomes rose 241 percent, in contrast to 11 percent growth for the bottom fifth and 19 percent growth for the middle fifth.[Chart credit: Economic Policy Institute] (credit:Economic Policy Institute)
Wages have grown more quickly for the rich.(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
Wages for the top one percent spiked 131 percent between 1979 and 2010, while wages for the bottom 90 percent of workers rose just 15 percent over that same period, according to the Economic Policy Institute.[Chart credit: Economic Policy Institute] (credit:Economic Policy Institute)
The poorest Americans are earning less than in 1979.(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
Americans in the bottom tenth of the wage distribution earned less last year than the lowest earners did in 1979, accounting for inflation, according to the Economic Policy Institute. Meanwhile, the real wages of the median worker rose only 6 percent between 1979 and 2011. (credit:Economic Policy Institute)
The American Dream is eroding.(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
"Families headed by early baby boomers (born between 1945-1954) are the last generation (on average) to achieve higher living standards than the one that preceded them," the Economic Policy Institute says. Among families with incomes below $28,000 in 1994, less than 1 percent made it to the top fifth of incomes 10 years later, according to the Economic Policy Institute. (credit:AP)
This has been a lost decade.(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
On average, hourly pay has not grown at all since 2002 for workers with a college degree or with only a high school degree, according to the Economic Policy Institute. Wages have not grown for college graduates in nearly every occupation, and college graduates in the 70th income percentile or lower have had stagnant or falling wages since 2000.[Chart credit: Economic Policy Institute] (credit:Economic Policy Institute)