But tax-dodging CEOs complain about high rates all the same.
|
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) requested the Government Accountability Office study.

  • The presidential hopeful said the findings reveal that "there is something profoundly wrong in America."

  • The report comes amid a rise in "corporate inversion" deals aimed at avoiding U.S. corporate taxes.

Open Image Modal
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has co-sponsored a bill to curb corporate tax avoidance.
Kenneth Gabrielsen/Getty Images

A new government report shows just how easy corporate America has it.

Every year from 2006 to 2012, some two-thirds of U.S. corporations did not pay federal income tax, according to a Government Accountability Office study released on Wednesday. In 2012 alone, 42.5 percent of businesses that the GAO defines as large did not pay federal taxes, including 19.5 percent of big corporations that posted a profit.

The GAO said those corporations in the black that still did not pay federal taxes benefitted from loopholes and tax incentives, such as the practice of rolling over losses from previous years. That enables companies to deduct those losses from their tax burden.

Profitable U.S. corporations paid, on average, an effective federal income tax rate of 14 percent over the slightly shorter period from 2008 to 2012, the federal government watchdog found.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who requested the report, immediately condemned the findings and touted legislation he has co-sponsored to curb corporate tax avoidance.

"There is something profoundly wrong in America when one out of five profitable corporations pay nothing in federal income taxes," Sanders said in a statement.

Which companies did not pay taxes in the period the study examined varied from year to year, but the findings nonetheless paint a stark picture of light taxation overall.

The findings are likely to affect an ongoing debate over corporate tax rates and the increasingly creative techniques big businesses use to avoid paying them. 

The report also comes in the wake of the publication of the Panama Papers this month, a trove of leaked documents exposing massive tax dodging schemes by global leaders and businesses, which raised awareness of evasion issues.

“There is something profoundly wrong in America when one out of five profitable corporations pay nothing in federal income taxes.”

- Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

There has been a rash of “corporate inversions” in recent years, whereby U.S. companies acquire smaller foreign firms in order to reincorporate in countries with lower taxes.

The Treasury Department enacted a rule change last week designed to crack down on inversions.

Executives at these companies claim the top statutory corporate tax rate in the U.S. of 35 percent is so high relative to other countries, that they have little choice but to move overseas in order to remain competitive.

But the GAO study provides new support for the arguments of fair taxation advocates, who have long noted that effective corporate tax rates are much lower than the statutory rates.

Ireland, one of the most popular destinations for corporate inversions, has a corporate tax rate of 12.5 percent. That is not much lower than the 14-percent rate paid on average by profitable U.S. corporations in recent years.

However, in the United States, unlike most other countries, overseas profits are subject to domestic tax rates if corporations bring those earnings back to the country. As a result, corporations have an incentive to stash money overseas indefinitely. Avoidance techniques like inversions just enable them to get greater access to their hoarded cash.

Most other countries have what is known as a “territorial” tax system, which allows companies to pay the tax rate of the country where profit was earned.

President Barack Obama has laid out a “framework” for corporate tax reform that includes a transition to an arrangement that looks more like territorial taxation. As an interim step, the president has called for a one-time 14-percent tax rate for corporations that bring their offshore earnings back to the U.S.

Citizens for Tax Justice, a liberal group, criticized the White House’s proposed amnesty for corporations as a “wasteful giveaway to the biggest offshore tax avoiders.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story stated that one in five profitable U.S. corporations (19.5 percent) paid no federal taxes. However, this was true only of large profitable corporations in 2012 alone.

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

World Leaders Connected To The Panama Papers
Icelandic Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnalaugsson(01 of12)
Open Image Modal
Gunnlaugsson and his wife were creditors to three major Icelandic banks that failed during the 2008 financial collapse through their company, Wintris Inc. Gunnlaugsson did not declare his ownership of Wintris when he entered parliament in 2009. (credit:REUTERS/Bertil Enevag Ericson/Scanpix/Files)
Associates Of Russian President Vladimir Putin(02 of12)
Open Image Modal
While Putin was not directly named in the Panama Papers, many of his associates and friends were linked to offshore companies named in the document leak. (credit:Kirill Kudryavtsev/Pool/Reuters)
United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan(03 of12)
Open Image Modal
Sheikh Khalifa had interests in at least 30 British Virgin Islands companies, which were used to purchase and hold luxury real estate in London worth at least $1.7 billion. (credit:Ahmed Jadallah/Reuters)
Cousins of Syrian President Bashar Assad(04 of12)
Open Image Modal
Assad's first cousins, Rami and Hafez Makhlouf, held shares in oil and telecoms companies through offshore companies. U.S. diplomatic cables described Rami Makhlouf as Syria's “poster boy for corruption.” The U.S. blacklisted Hafez Makhlouf in 2007 and imposed sanctions on Rami Makhlouf in 2008. (credit:REUTERS/SANA/Handout)
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi(05 of12)
Open Image Modal
Allawi was listed as the sole director and shareholder of multiple offshore companies, some of which held properties on Allawi's behalf. The former prime minister's media office confirmed that he had interests in those companies. (credit:Thaier Al-Sudani/Reuters)
Father of UK Prime Minister David Cameron(06 of12)
Open Image Modal
Ian Cameron, the late father of David Cameron, managed millions of dollars in an offshore investment fund that avoided paying U.K. taxes. (credit:REUTERS/Joshua Roberts)
Saudi Arabian King Salman(07 of12)
Open Image Modal
King Salman appeared to have unspecified interests in multiple British Virgin Islands companies that took out several mortgages on luxury houses in London. He was also named the "principal user" of a yacht that was registered by a BVI company. (credit:Bandar al-Jaloud/Saudi Royal Court/Handout/Reuters)
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko(08 of12)
Open Image Modal
Poroshenko set up an offshore company in the British Virgin Islands in 2014. The Ukrainian president, a self-made tycoon who had businesses in the confectionary, construction and media industries, had once vowed to crack down on corruption. On April 4, Poroshenko tweeted that he "treats declaring of assets, paying taxes, conflict of interest issues seriously" and that he had stopped actively managing his assets since becoming president. (credit:Francois Lenoir/Reuters)
Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Pavlo Lazarenko(09 of12)
Open Image Modal
Lazarenko, who had been convicted of money laundering and conspiracy in the past, had interests in British Virgin Islands-based companies embroiled in multiple corruption investigations. U.S. authorities are still seeking $250 million from Lazarenko's offshore accounts. (credit:Kimberly White/Reuters)
Children of Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif(10 of12)
Open Image Modal
Three of Sharif's children had interests in several British Virgin Islands companies, which owned properties in the U.K. that were reportedly for use by the Sharif family. (credit:Stephane Mahe/Reuters)
Former Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani(11 of12)
Open Image Modal
Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani owned several companies based in the British Virgin Islands, the Bahamas and Panama. He used the companies to hold shares and mooring spaces in Spain, to manage a yacht and to hold bank accounts. Some of the companies have since been dissolved. (credit:ODD ANDERSEN/AFP/Getty Images)
Son of Former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan(12 of12)
Open Image Modal
Kojo Annan, the son of Kofi Annan, acted as the sole director, joint shareholder and director of a Samoan company and two British Virgin Islands companies. Kojo Annan used his Samoan company, Sapphire Holding Ltd., to purchase a London apartment for more than $500,000. (credit:Stefan Wermuth/Reuters)