Google's Antitrust Settlement Reflects Small Price Corporations Pay To Buy Influence In D.C.

How Much Does It Cost To Beat The Feds? For Google, It Was A Drop In The Bucket
Open Image Modal
US Internet giant Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt poses prior to a meeting with French Minister for Culture and Communication, on October 29, 2012 at the Ministry of Culture in Paris. Google's executive chairman Schmidt will meet with French President Francois Hollande later in the day, as the Internet giant wrangles with Paris over a bill that would force search engines to pay for content, a government source said on October 27. Google had warned that it would exclude French media sites from its search results if France adopted a bill that would force search engines to pay for content. AFP PHOTO / POOL / MIGUEL MEDINA (Photo credit should read MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images)

How much does it cost to get the feds off your back?

For Google, the price was less than 1 percent of the cash in its pocket.

Google stepped up its lobbying efforts during the two-year period when the government was investigating the search giant for possible antitrust violations, spending $25 million to buy influence in Washington, Politico reports late Thursday.

That investment paid off Thursday when the Federal Trade Commission announced it was taking no action on a major part of its investigation -- that Google used its market power to demote competitors' listings in search results.

The lobbying costs were a small price to pay for Google -- to be precise, about .05 percent of the $50 billion in cash the company keeps on hand, The Next Web notes.

By comparison, Google spent nearly three times more on TV ads in the United States last year -- about $70 million -- than the company paid lobbyists during the FTC investigation.

Google’s successful lobbying effort reinforces the perception that the government is no match for the deep-pocketed corporations that it’s supposed to watch over. Last year, regulators tried repeatedly to punish Google over alleged privacy failures, but extracted penalties that amounted to little more than slaps on the wrist.

In April, the Federal Communications Commission hit Google with a $25,000 penalty for obstructing an investigation into charges the company’s Street View cars siphoned personal data of residents from nearby Wi-Fi networks.

In August, the FTC said it obtained its largest settlement ever when Google agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine over charges it bypassed privacy settings in Apple’s Safari browser to display targeted advertisements.

Yet even David Vladeck, the director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said at the time that the penalty "may not seem like a lot of money to Google." In 2011 year, Google earned $37.9 billion in revenue, nearly all of which came from advertising.

Meanwhile, the FTC appears to lack basic resources to conduct its investigations, according to a report last year in Wired. The agency's entire budget last year was $312 million, or less than 1 percent of Google's 2011 revenue.

Sweet talk, it turns out, helped get regulators on Google's side, too. The New York Times notes that executives at Microsoft, which famously faced down the federal government its own antitrust case in 1990s, "were known for their uncooperative demeanors during their tangle with the government." Google learned a lesson from that case and treated government officials nicely, the Times reports.

Google isn't the only one to step up its lobbying efforts to avoid harsh penalties from regulators. Last year, Facebook doubled the amount of money it spent on lobbying, spending about $2.6 million while the FTC investigated the social network over charges it revealed details about users' without consent.

That investment appeared to also pay off: In August, the FTC announced that, as part of a settlement, Facebook agreed to government audits of its privacy practices, but would not pay any fine.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Google's Biggest Acquisitions
#6 - ITA Software ($700 million)(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
What people said...Henry Harteveldt, analyst at Forrester Research: "Google's mission is to organize the world's information, and ITA does that for travel"Edward Hasbrouck, author and policy analyst for Consumer Travel Alliance: "Google's purchase of ITA Software is likely to be a bad thing for travelers."Acquired: 2010Source: Google Blog (credit:Getty)
#5 - AdMob ($750 million)(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
What people said...Neil Strother, analyst at Forrester Research: "The deal shows that Google is serious about becoming a major player in the mobile advertising ecosystem"Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center: "We've reached a point in Google's evolution in which Washington agencies and Congressional committees need to look more closely at the company's dominance of Internet services"Acquired: 2010Source: Google Blog (credit:AP)
#4 - Waze ($1.1 Billion)(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
Google bought mapping startup Waze for $1.1 billion on June 11, 2013, AllThingsD reports. (credit:AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
#3 - YouTube ($1.65 billion)(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
What people said...Goldman Sachs: "We expect investors to be excited by the strategic opportunities, but they will be skeptical of the $1.65 billion price, given YouTube's early stages" Martin Pyykkonen, analyst at Global Crown Capital: "I would think that a lot of advertisers would be willing to pay a premium for a video search ad opposed to paid search text"Acquired: 2006Source: Google (credit:Getty)
#2 - DoubleClick ($3.1 billion)(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
What people said...Federal Trade Commission: "The FTC lacks the legal authority to block the transaction on grounds, or require conditions to this transaction, that do not relate to antitrust"Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy: "The FTC is supposed to protect the privacy of Americans in the digital age. The excuse offered by the majority of the commission-that consumer privacy can't be addressed by current antitrust law-reveals a lack of leadership and determination to protect U.S. consumers"Acquired: 2008Source: Google Blog (credit:Flickr: Bigmouthmedia)
#1 - Motorola Mobility ($12.5 billion)(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
What people are saying...Henry Blodget, editor-in-chief at Business Insider: "This deal could end up being a disaster"Jeff Jarvis, author: "Google buys rat poison"Hendi Susanto, analyst at Gabelli & Co: "Google and Motorola will create a stronger hardware - software integration to compete with Apple, Samsung, and HTC."Acquired: 2011Source: Google Blog (credit:AP)