Shark Tourism Worth More Than Killing Them For Food, New Study Shows

Why Sharks Generate More Money Alive Than Dead
|
Open Image Modal

Sharks that are free to swim around in their natural habitats are a valuable part of tourism around the world, a new study finds, which suggests sharks are worth more in the world's oceans than they are on restaurant menus.

The new research provides evidence of the value of conservation against the rampant killing of sharks for food, said study lead author Andrés Cisneros-Montemayor, a Ph.D. candidate in the fisheries economics research unit at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Canada.

A team of scientists pored through data from 70 sites in 45 countries to compare how much money is generated each year by fisheries that fuel the global shark fin trade, and how much is generated by ecotourism, which encompasses all forms of shark-watching activities.

Currently, shark ecotourism brings in $314 million annually worldwide, and this sector is expected to continue growing. Surges in shark tourism are particularly evident in the Caribbean and Australia, the researchers said.

"That figure is projected to double to over $700 million per year within the next 20 years," Cisneros-Montemayor told LiveScience.

In comparison, the landed market value (which refers to the market value of goods on the day they are offloaded from a vessel) of shark fisheries around the globe is $630 million per year, but has been in decline over the past 10 to 15 years, the researchers said. [On the Brink: A Gallery of Wild Sharks]

Approximately 38 million sharks are killed each year to meet the demands of the controversial shark fin industry, which uses the fins to make shark fin soup, a dish that is considered a delicacy in some Asian countries. Sharks are often thrown back into the ocean to die after their fins have been removed.

But, there are other important reasons to promote shark conservation beyond economics, Cisneros-Montemayor said. For one, sharks play a vital role in the ecosystem of the oceans.

"Studies have found that if you remove top predators, like sharks, you change the structure of the ecosystem itself," he explained. "This significantly changes the ecosystem, and it puts you in danger of all kinds of bad things happening."

For one, sharks keep the ocean's complex food webs in balance by feeding on aging or slower populations of fish. This keeps fish species lower down on the food chain from becoming too populous, or from overfeeding on their respective prey. Without sharks, this delicate system could collapse, Cisneros-Montemayor explained.Shark conservation efforts are also imperative in order to ensure the health of the species, the researchers said.

"Sharks are slow to mature and produce few offspring," study co-author Rashid Sumaila, director of UBC's Fisheries Center, said in a statement. "The protection of live sharks, especially through dedicated protected areas, can benefit a much wider economic spectrum while helping the species recover."

The results of the study were published Thursday (May 30) in Oryx – The International Journal of Conservation.

Follow Denise Chow on Twitter @denisechow. Follow LiveScience @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Where Shark Fin Is Banned
Port Moody, B.C.(01 of08)
Open Image Modal
This municipality became the first in B.C. to ban shark fin in May 2012 -- even though its three Chinese restaurants don't serve it. (credit:AP)
Toronto(02 of08)
Open Image Modal
Toronto banned shark fin in October 2011. Other Ontario cities with a ban include Oakville, London, Pickering, and Brantford. (credit:Shutterstock)
North Vancouver & Maple Ridge, B.C.(03 of08)
Open Image Modal
The municipalities passed their shark fin bans in September 2012. (credit:Alamy)
Hawaii(04 of08)
Open Image Modal
Hawaii was the first state in the U.S. to ban possession of shark fin. (credit:Alamy)
California(05 of08)
Open Image Modal
California banned shark fin in October 2011. (credit:AP)
Illinois(06 of08)
Open Image Modal
Illinois became the first inland state, fifth in the U.S., to pass a comprehensive ban against the trade, sale or distribution of shark fins in July 2012. (credit:AP)
Oregon, Washington(07 of08)
Open Image Modal
Oregon passed a shark fin ban in August 2011, while Washington state did it in May that same year. (credit:AP)
Venezuela(08 of08)
Open Image Modal
The South American country announced it is banning shark finning in its waters and has established a new shark sanctuary in June 2012. Costa Rica has passed a similar ban on finning in October 2012. (credit:Shutterstock)