America Is 'Less Safe' Than 2 Years Ago, Intelligence Committee Chairs Say

Feinstein: U.S. 'Less Safe' Than 2 Years Ago
|

The lawmakers who lead the House and Senate intelligence committees both said on Sunday that they believe the United States is less safe from a terror attack than it was two years ago.

Interviewed on CNN's "State of the Union," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she believed that there are now more terrorists with the technological means to carry out a bombing in the U.S.

"I think terror is up worldwide," said Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee. "There are new bombs, very big bombs, trucks being reinforced for those bombs. There are bombs that go through magnetometers. The bomb-maker is still alive. There are more groups than ever. And there is huge malevolence out there."

Feinstein added that there was "a real displaced aggression in this very fundamentalist jihadist Islamic community, and that is that the West is responsible for everything that goes wrong and that the only thing that's going to solve this is Islamic Sharia law."

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chair of the House Intelligence Committee, said he agreed with Feinstein's assessment.

"I absolutely agree that we're not [safer] today, for the very same reasons," he said. "The pressure on our intelligence service to get it right to prevent an attack is enormous."

Asked about the recent revelations of the National Security Agency's spying programs, Rogers said he worried that the disclosures were distracting the agency from its work.

"Our fear is, every time we do that we take them away from their focus, which is what is al Qaeda's next event," Rogers said.

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

2012's Most Expensive Senate Races
Massachusetts -- Scott Brown vs. Elizabeth Warren: $77,270,031(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, left, gestures as he answers a question during a debate against Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren, right, in Lowell, Mass. on Monday, Oct. 1, 2012. (AP Photo/The Boston Herald, Matt Stone, Pool)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Connecticut -- Chris Murphy vs. Linda McMahon: $59,932,468 (02 of10)
Open Image Modal
Democratic candidate, U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., left, and Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Linda McMahon, right, shake hands after a debate in Hartford, Conn., Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Ohio -- Josh Mandel vs. Sherrod Brown: $43,351,434(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, right, shakes hands with Republican challenger, Ohio state treasurer Josh Mandel, after their debate at the City Club in Cleveland Monday, Oct. 15, 2012. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Pennsylvania -- Tom Smith vs. Bob Casey: $35,547,862(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Tom Smith, left, speaks as Democratic U.S. Sen. Bob Casey looks on during a debate between Pennsylvania's candidates for U.S. Senate, at the WPVI-TV studio, Friday, Oct. 26, 2012, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Virginia -- Tim Kaine vs. George Allen: $32,340,418(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican candidate George Allen, right, looks on as Democratic candidate Tim Kaine speaks during a Senatorial debate for the Virginia U.S. Senate seat on Thursday, Sept. 20, 2012 in McLean, Va. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Missouri -- Todd Akin vs. Claire McCaskill: $27,429,980(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Rep. Todd Akin and Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill shake hands after the end of the second debate in the Missouri Senate race Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, in Clayton, Mo. (AP Photo/Emily Rasinski)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Wisconsin -- Tommy Thompson vs. Tammy Baldwin: $24,787,727(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican candidate for Wisconsin's U.S. Senate seat, former Gov. Tommy Thompson, left, participates in a debate against Democratic candidate U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin at Marquette University Friday, Oct. 26, 2012, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Florida -- Bill Nelson vs. Connie Mack IV: $24,699,817(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
Democratic candidate for Senate U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., right, gestures during a debate against Republican candidate Rep. Connie Mack IV, R-Fla., left, Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, in Davie, Fla. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Montana -- Jon Tester vs. Denny Rehberg: $22,874,724(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Sen. Jon Tester greets supporters to announce his win on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, in Great Falls, Mont. Tester prevailed in a tight re-election battle, handing Republican U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg his first election loss since 1996. (AP Photo/Michael Albans)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Nevada -- Dean Heller vs. Shelley Berkley: $20,817,344(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Sen. Dean Heller, left, and Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., arrive for their debate, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)