South American Governments Slam Obama Over Venezuela Sanctions

South American Governments Slam Obama Over Venezuela Sanctions
|
Open Image Modal
Venezuela's Foreign Minister Delcy Rodriguez speaks to the press following the UNASUR meeting in Quito, on March 14, 2015. Ecuador called for an UNASUR special meeting to analyse the US sanctions on Venezuela and denounces of destabilization of the government of President Nicolas Maduro. AFP PHOTO / RODRIGO BUENDIA (Photo credit should read RODRIGO BUENDIA/AFP/Getty Images)

South America's governments aren’t pleased with the Obama administration’s recent characterization of Venezuela as a “national security threat.”

President Barack Obama issued an executive order on March 9 sanctioning seven Venezuelan government and military officials accused of committing human rights abuses and participating in the detention of such opposition leaders as Caracas Mayor Antonio Ledezma Diaz. Venezuelan authorities jailed Ledezma last month after accusing him of participating in a coup plot. Ledezma has denied the charges, and critics of President Nicolás Maduro's government view his arrest as politically motivated.

The U.S. property of the seven individuals under sanction is being frozen, Americans are barred from doing business with them, and the seven cannot travel to the U.S.

But the main object of South American ire may be the language leading off Obama's order. It describes the situation in Venezuela as constituting an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

The Union of South American Nations, which speaks for the continent's 12 independent countries, demanded the U.S. drop the sanctions in a statement issued Saturday, calling them “a threat to sovereignty and the principle of non-intervention in the internal affairs of other states.” The foreign ministers of all UNASUR's member nations signed the declaration at a special meeting in Quito, Ecuador, according to Argentine news site Infobae.

Several Latin American leaders had already condemned the sanctions and the portrayal of Venezuela as a security threat in public statements ahead of the meeting.

“Whoever looks at the map and says that Venezuela could be a threat to the United States has to be out of his mind,” former Uruguayan President José Mujica said last week. “Venezuela has problems and they should be solved by Venezuelans.”

The Argentine foreign ministry echoed the criticism, saying that “it’s absolutely unbelievable that any marginally informed person would think that Venezuela, or any other South American or Latin American country, could constitute a threat to the national security of the United States.”

The U.S. government hasn’t typically described Venezuela as a major security threat. The 2015 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community, released last month by the director of national intelligence, devotes two paragraphs to Venezuela, neither of which describe the country as a threat to the United States.

But a senior U.S. administration official told reporters last week that the use of "national security" language is standard when issuing an executive order to impose sanctions. “Most of the sanctions programs that we have, from Iran to Syria, Burma, across the board, rely on these same types of national emergency declarations,” the official said.

Adam Isacson, senior associate for regional security policy at the human rights nonprofit Washington Office on Latin America, explained that under U.S. law, the executive has to declare a national emergency that threatens national security in order to freeze a foreigner’s assets by executive order.

“It has to look like a big, special thing, if you’re going to do it,” Isacson told The Huffington Post. “That’s why it has that stupid language at the beginning. I think the sanctions themselves are pretty legitimate. The United States has the right to decide who gets to do business and own property here in our country, and we should be limiting the number of human rights abusers who get to do that."

Isacson also suggested that more people were worthy of sanctions. "Just look at New York and all the condos that are owned by Russian oligarchs,” he said. He noted as well the prevalence of human rights abuses in Mexico and Colombia, countries with which the United States enjoys good diplomatic relations.

Venezuela’s national legislature responded to the sanctions by giving Maduro wide latitude to rule largely by decree for a nine-month period. Venezuelan state media said that such power would allow Maduro to govern “with rank, bravery and strength in reference to Venezuela’s foreign policy, defense of sovereignty and diplomacy.”

The Venezuelan military also began carrying out a week and a half of military maneuvers this past Saturday, with the stated aim of showing that the country is prepared to repel foreign aggression.

Last month Maduro had accused U.S. Vice President Joe Biden of conspiring with foreign governments to overthrow him -- a claim that U.S. officials have called “ludicrous.”

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Why Latin Americans Really Come To The U.S.
It's not just about the 'American Dream'(01 of20)
Open Image Modal
The conventional wisdom says that most Latin American migrants who come to the United States are looking for a better life, inspired by the "American Dream." And it's hard to deny that there's a lot of truth in that.

But there's another side to the story. People leave Latin America because life there can be very hard. Poverty, political instability and recurring financial crises often conspire to make Latin American life more challenging than in the U.S., a wealthy country with lots of job opportunities.

Living on the northern side of the U.S.-Mexico border, it's easy to view Latin America as another world, isolated from the United States. But the truth is that the U.S. government has historically made life in Latin America harder by overthrowing democratically elected governments, financing atrocities and pushing trade policies that undermine Latin American industries, dealing blows to local economies. Perhaps instead of building walls, the United States should focus on being a better neighbor.

Here are 19 ways the U.S. government has helped spur immigration by making life harder in Latin America.
(credit:ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Took over almost half of Mexico(02 of20)
Open Image Modal
In 1846, shortly after the annexation of Texas, President James Polk ordered U.S. troops into disputed lands, precipitating a war against Mexico. The war ended with the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. This is what Chicano activists mean when they say "the border crossed them." Today, 33.5 million people of Mexican origin live in the United States. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5baea4eae4b006f4f197d0ca" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="22" data-vars-position-in-unit="35">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60584010@N00/3212637401" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="leiris202" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5baea4eae4b006f4f197d0ca" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60584010@N00/3212637401" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="23" data-vars-position-in-unit="36">leiris202</a>)
Colonized Puerto Rico in 1898(03 of20)
Open Image Modal
The United States invaded Puerto Rico in 1898 during the Spanish American War and has retained control of the island ever since. More people of Puerto Rican descent currently live in the United States than on the island. (credit:A member of the U.S. Army Honor Guard salutes the Puerto Rican and U.S. flags.)
Took over Cuba, put a naval base there, and only left when the new government allowed them the right to intervene at will(04 of20)
Open Image Modal
And yet somehow, U.S. politicians viewed themselves as liberators. Later U.S. administrations would use the naval base to jail suspected terrorists and hold them indefinitely without trial, also submitting them to torture tactics, according to Human Rights Watch. (credit:Wikimedia: Col. Theodore Roosevelt stands triumphant on San Juan Hill, Cuba.)
Invaded and occupied Cuba two more times(05 of20)
Open Image Modal
Because once wasn't good enough, the United States invaded and occupied Cuba again in 1906 and once more in 1912. It retained the legal authority to intervene in Cuba's affairs until the 1933 Sergeants' Revolt overthrew U.S.-backed dictator Gerardo Machado. (credit:WikiMedia: The leaders of the 1933 Sergeants revolution: Ramón Grau, Sergio Carbó and Sgt. Fulgencio Batista.)
Invaded Nicaragua and occupied the country for two decades(06 of20)
Open Image Modal
The United States invaded Nicaragua in 1912 and occupied the country until 1933. Shortly after the U.S. forces left, Anastasio Somoza took over, launching a decades-long dynastic dictatorship with U.S. support. (credit:WikiMedia: Fort on Coyotepe hill, near Masaya, Nicaragua, during the Nicaraguan Civil War and U.S. occupation, circa 1912.)
Invaded Haiti and occupied the country for nearly 20 years(07 of20)
Open Image Modal
Woodrow Wilson ordered the Marines to invade and occupy Haiti in 1915 after the assassination of the Haitian president. The troops didn't leave until 1934. (credit:PA)
Invaded the Dominican Republic in 1916(08 of20)
Open Image Modal
Mainly to collect debts, the United States invaded the Dominican Republic in 1916. The occupation lasted eight years. (credit:WikiMedia: U.S. Marines in action in the Dominican Republic, c. 1916-1920. )
Overthrew Guatemala's elected government in 1954(09 of20)
Open Image Modal
At the behest of United Fruit Company, a U.S. corporation with extensive holdings in Central America, the CIA helped engineer the overthrow of the Guatemalan government in 1954, ushering in decades of civil war that resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. (credit:Getty Images: 28th June 1954, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, right.)
Organized the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961(10 of20)
Open Image Modal
The CIA organized and financed a group of anti-Fidel Castro exiles in an ill-fated attempt to overthrow the revolutionary government. The botched invasion ended in disaster and Castro declared himself a "Marxist-Leninist" eight months later. (credit:Alamy)
Supported the overthrow of a democratically elected government in Brazil(11 of20)
Open Image Modal
The administration of Lyndon Johnson assisted the overthrow of the democratically elected Brazilian government in 1964. The resulting military dictatorship, which tortured thousands of opponents and "disappeared" hundreds, ruled the country until 1985. (credit:WikiMedia: U.S. Army officer Charles Murray walks with Pres. John F. Kennedy, left, and Brazilian Pres. João Goulart on April 3, 1962.)
Helped overthrow Chile's elected government in 1973(12 of20)
Open Image Modal
Gen. Augusto Pinochet, with the support of the Nixon administration, overthrew the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende, ushering in decades of violent dictatorship. (credit:Alamy: Former President of Chile Salvador Allende. )
Backed a military dictatorship in Argentina that killed 30,000 people(13 of20)
Open Image Modal
When the military overthrew the Argentine government and installed a dictatorship in 1976, the Gerald Ford administration responded by offering its wholehearted support and financial assistance. The dictatorship lasted until 1983. (credit:Former head of Argentina's military dictatorship Jorge Rafael Videla.)
Paid a failed rebel army to overthrow the Nicaraguan government (14 of20)
Open Image Modal
When the left-wing Sandinista government rose to power in Nicaragua, it did not please Washington. In 1979, the U.S. began years of financing the "Contras," a right-wing group responsible for committing atrocities and smuggling drugs into the U.S. with the Reagan administration's knowledge. (credit:Alamy)
Invaded Haiti again in 1994(15 of20)
Open Image Modal
One invasion wasn't good enough. The U.S. military returned in 1994. (credit:A U.S. Army soldier monitors the surroundings of the National Palace, on Oct. 15, 1994, in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.)
Fomented a rebellion in Panama in order to build a canal(16 of20)
Open Image Modal
The Theodore Roosevelt administration helped a group of Panamanian nationalists break away from Colombia, after that country's Senate rejected the terms of a deal to allow the U.S. to use its territory there to build a canal. After Panama broke away, the new country ceded permanent control of the canal zone to the U.S. government, which finally returned it in 1999, after years of protests. (credit:WikiMedia: Miraflores Locks, Panama Canal.)
Backed the Salvadoran military as it committed atrocities in the 1980s(17 of20)
Open Image Modal
El Salvador's military committed atrocities throughout the 1980s with U.S. funding, including -- but not limited to -- raping nuns, assassinating priests and killing hundreds of children in a single massacre at the village of El Mozote. (credit:AP: Former Salvadoran military officials. )
Refuses to control the flow of weapons into Mexico(18 of20)
Open Image Modal
Mexican authorities seized almost 70,000 weapons of U.S. origin from 2007 to 2011. In 2004, the U.S. Congress declined to renew a 10-year ban on the sale of assault weapons. They quickly became the guns of choice for Mexican drug cartels. (credit:Getty Images)
Helped create today's drug cartels(19 of20)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. funded the Guatemalan military during the 1960s and 1970s anti-insurgency war, despite awareness of widespread human rights violations. Among the recipients of U.S. military funding and training were the Kaibiles, a special force unit responsible for several massacres. Former Kaibiles have joined the ranks of the Zetas drug cartel. (credit:AP)
Pushes trade policies that lead to unemployment(20 of20)
Open Image Modal
One of the things that prompted millions of low-wage workers to abandon Mexico over the last two decades was the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. With NAFTA, cheap imports, particularly agricultural products, flooded the Mexican market, leaving farmers and other low-skilled workers without jobs. NAFTA is just one manifestation of free trade policies pushed in Washington that often have adverse effects in Latin American countries. Former President Bill Clinton acknowledged as much after Haiti's devastating 2010 earthquake, saying that opening up the Haitian market to cheap U.S. rice "may have been good for some of my farmers in Arkansas, but it has not worked. ... I had to live every day with the consequences of the loss of capacity to produce a rice crop in Haiti to feed those people because of what I did, nobody else." (credit:Getty Images: Demonstrators carry an oversized replica of a corn cob to protest the lowering of tariffs due to NAFTA.)