Arizona Republican Praises Anti-Immigrant ‘Hate Group' (UPDATED)

Arizona Republican Praises ‘Hate Group'
|
Open Image Modal
Sen. Al Melvin, R-Tucson, left, co-chair of the special committee of the Arizona Legislature called the Joint Border Security Advisory Committee, talks with fellow committee member Charles Ryan, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, as the group meets to discuss examining security along the state's border with Mexico, at the Arizona Capitol Wednesday, March 30, 2011, in Phoenix. The committee consists of six Republican lawmakers, a lobbyist for cattlemen, the head of the Arizona National Guard and the leaders of four state agencies. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Arizona State Sen. Al Melvin (R-Tucson) praised an organization characterized as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center this week and urged the public to spend millions of tax dollars on the group’s border security system.

Melvin mentioned the work of the American Border Patrol during a Senate Appropriations Committee meeting Tuesday while arguing in favor of a bill to create a “virtual fence” that would use a combination of video sensors and radar to monitor where people attempt to cross the U.S.-Mexico border illegally.

“It’s our responsibility to do all that we can in a reasonable manner to stem the leaking like a sieve at the border,” Melvin said. “There’s a company in Chochise county -- the American Border Patrol -- I would encourage people to look at that website.”

The front page of the website plays up the group’s relationship with Melvin, featuring an article describing how the state legislator participated in the presentation of a border security system called the “Sonic Barrier” back in 2010.

The Southern Poverty Law Center describes American Border Patrol’s leader, Glenn Spencer, as a “vitriolic Mexican-basher and self-appointed guardian of the border.”

A representative for Spencer contacted HuffPost to deny these specific descriptions and state that "Mr. Spencer and the ABP have no issue with law-abiding entrants or our newest citizens." Spencer has denied charges of racism in the past, saying some of his statements have been taken out of context, according to the El Paso Times.

Spencer produced a film called “Conquest of Aztlán,” in 2001, in which he argues that Mexicans are conspiring to reconquer the U.S. Southwest, with the aid of the Mexican government. An item posted last year in the American Patrol Report, a news website affiliated with the American Border Patrol, suggested President Barack Obama supported such a plan.

"By invoking the phrase 'the border crossed them,' Barack Obama once again makes it clear that he supports the Reconquista's claim that the Southwest was stolen from Mexico and that Mexicans have a right to take it back," the American Patrol Report's editors wrote.

The fence discussed by the Arizona Senate Appropriations Commitee would cost an estimated $30 million, the Associated Press reports, though the bill passed by the committee doesn’t include an appropriation. The Department of Homeland Security abandoned a similar attempt in 2011 after spending almost $1 billion, due to agency concerns that the system cost more than it was worth.

American Border Patrol’s leader Glenn Spencer has been working on a similar “virtual fence” system, whose name has changed from “Sonic Barrier” to “IDENTISEIS” since it was first demonstrated to Arizona lawmakers. Melvin said he favored using the system Spencer helped develop and would like to install it using prison labor paid at $0.50 per hour, according to Arizona 3TV.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article incorrectly said that Glenn Spencer's film "Conquest of Aztlán" argued that President Barack Obama supported an alleged Mexican plan to reconquer the U.S. Southwest. In fact, the film was made in 2001 and the statement regarding Obama was made on the American Patrol Report's website last year.

This post has been updated to add a comment from a representative of Glenn Spencer.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

6 Misconceptions About The Border
The U.S.-Mexico border is violent(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
It certainly is in some places, but those don't tend to be on the U.S. side. In fact, El Paso, Texas and San Diego, California are the two safest cities in the country, according to Congressional Quarterly. While Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has repeatedly said the border in her state is dangerous, crime statistics reported by USA Today and The Huffington Post show that violent crime has dropped along the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona, as well as California, New Mexico and Texas. (credit:AP)
The porous U.S.-Mexico border is vulnerable to terrorists(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
That’s not the assessment of the U.S. government. The Mexico section of the most recent State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism reads:
No known international terrorist organization had an operational presence in Mexico and no terrorist group targeted U.S. citizens in or from Mexican territory. There was no evidence of ties between Mexican criminal organizations and terrorist groups, nor that the criminal organizations had political or territorial control, aside from seeking to protect and expand the impunity with which they conduct their criminal activity.
H/T: Washington Office on Latin America.
(credit:In this photo provided by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a silver Jeep Cherokee that suspected smugglers were attempting to drive over the U.S.-Mexico border fence is stuck at the top of a makeshift ramp early Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012 near Yuma, )
The border is insecure(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
Depends on how you define "secure." By practically all measurements, the border is at its most secure point in recent history. There's more than 20,000 Border Patrol agents stationed along the border now -- about double the number since 2004. Apprehensions along the border, one of the most reliable measures of illegal entry, are at their lowest level in 40 years. But politicians have yet to agree on how to define what "secure" will mean for legal purposes. (credit:In this Sept. 4, 2012, photo, Max Pons, manager of the Nature Conservancy's southernmost preserve, walks past the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Brownsville, Texas. (AP))
Obama has been soft on enforcement(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
Not so. In fact, it's one of the biggest gripes immigration activists have with him. While Obama has exempted many people who came to the United States as children from deportation, he has also set records, deporting over 400,000 people last fiscal year and removing more migrants in one term than George W. Bush did in two. (credit:A group of undocumented immigrants wait in line while being deported to Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry in Nogales, Ariz., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP))
The U.S. hasn't committed enough resources to securing the border(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
Again, depends on who you ask. The $18 billion the federal government spent on border enforcement in the 2012 fiscal year was more than it spent on than on other law enforcement agencies combined, according to the Migration Policy Institute -- about 15 times more than it did in the mid-1980s. Is that enough, especially in a context in which illegal immigration stands at net zero? If, not, what is? (credit:In this Aug. 9, 2012 file photo, a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle keeps watch along the border fence in Nogales, Ariz. (AP))
Illegal immigration continues to skyrocket(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
Nope. For all the talk from outraged politicians, you'd think that immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border remains at historically high levels. In fact, illegal immigration from Mexico has dropped to net zero or less, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. (credit:In this May 18, 2006 file photo, a man rests his hands on a fence looking out to the United States from a Mexican customs station after being detained by U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona and returned to Mexico in Nogales, Mexico. The border near Nogales is c)