The Fight To Stop Fossil Fuel Financing Is Poised To Get Some Powerful New Allies

Lawmakers in the capital of capital are considering backing the campaign targeting banks, asset managers and insurers.

The fight to force financiers and insurers to abandon fossil fuels may soon get some powerful new recruits: the New York City Council.

On Monday, lawmakers in the nation’s largest city are set to introduce a resolution to formally demand the banks, asset managers and insurance giants with which the city government does business divest from oil, gas and coal.

The resolution, shared with HuffPost in advance, names banking behemoth JPMorgan Chase, asset manager BlackRock and insurer Liberty Mutual as targets of the statement. The move comes as top U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, are preparing to seize oil and gas producers crushed by plummeting oil prices. 

As New York City’s death toll from the COVID-19 pandemic soars past 10,000, the legislators behind the resolution hope to lay the groundwork for how “we can emerge more prepared to do what we know we have to do to mitigate and prepare for the devastating consequences of the climate crisis that’s coming,” Brad Lander, the councilman from Brooklyn’s Park Slope neighborhood, told HuffPost.

“We are in the midst of a devastating short-term crisis … but the most devastating long-term risk to New York is the climate crisis,” said Lander, the lead author of the bill. “If we’re going to have any chance at actually bending the curve on CO2 emissions, we have to confront the capital that is driving it at its scale.” 

Open Image Modal
The sun sets over Manhattan.
Gary Hershorn via Getty Images

The bill ― which already has 10 co-sponsors ― would itself do little beyond taking a principled stand. But if passed, the resolution would add momentum to a fast-growing campaign to shame and pressure the institutions that climate activist and writer Bill McKibben described in The New Yorker last September as providing the “oxygen on which the fire of global warming burns.” The widely-circulated essay signaled the opening of a new front in the decade-long campaign to pressure investors to stop funding the extraction of more oil, gas and coal at a moment when scientists say the world needs to rapidly phase out fossil fuels.

The resolution could open the door to policy ideas that once seemed fringe in the capital of global finance. The city would likely face new pressure to redirect its banking services from JPMorgan Chase to an alternative such as Amalgamated Bank, which in 2018 started offering “100% fossil fuel free” portfolios. It could spur new calls for the city to establish its own municipal public bank, which would, in theory, fund clean infrastructure in poor neighborhoods where traditional investment historically displaces residents, if it happens at all. 

“It’s a different and, in some ways, much harder problem, where to put money in and not just take money out,” said Pete Sikora, a senior adviser to the climate and housing nonprofit New York Communities for Change. “There’s something of a contradiction here, because capitalism isn’t set up to fund fair and just results. It’s set up to make money for people who own capital.”

A public bank, he said, would help to “use the system to produce better results.” But it’s a complicated and costly proposition in a city whose resources are already stretched thin battling both the pandemic and an openly hostile president with little support among voters in his hometown. 

The resolution, then, could serve as a “shot across the bow” at the financial giants that benefit from New York City’s “colossal business purchasing,” Sikora said. 

“If we’re going to have any chance at actually bending the curve on CO2 emissions, we have to confront the capital that is driving it at its scale.”

- New York City Councilman Brad Lander

The resolution offers a preview of New York City’s major election next year, suggesting climate change will be a major campaign theme in open races for positions including mayor, comptroller and 35 of the City Council’s 51 seats. 

Lander, a progressive firebrand, is considered a top candidate to succeed Comptroller Scott Stringer, who is himself one of three leading candidates for mayor. 

“There’s a unique role around finance that the comptroller’s office of New York City has in particular, this being the headquarters of massive amounts of corporate finance,” Lander said, noting that Stringer made significant progress but could have “moved faster.” 

“I would make the climate crisis the number one issue focus of the office,” Lander added. 

During his time as the city’s chief fiscal and auditing officer, Stringer began the byzantine process of divesting roughly $5 billion in city workers’ pension funds from fossil fuel companies, a step he’s likely to highlight early next year when campaigning begins in earnest. Council Speaker Corey Johnson, another top mayoral contender, shepherded several major climate bills through the legislature last year, an achievement he’s also likely to promote as he pitches himself to voters still scarred by the memory of 2012’s deadly Superstorm Sandy. 

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

New York City's Public Spaces
(01 of13)
Open Image Modal
In many cases, pools of water like these send the "subtle message" that people "are not supposed to do anything here." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(02 of13)
Open Image Modal
"Clearly, this was not meant for people to sit on," Kent says. "It was meant to be viewed, not to be used -- the whole thing is about design, and how people make it messy, it isn't about what people want." The men here have had to climb onto the ledge, which is at an uncomfortably high distance off the ground -- but, as Kent points out, there's no movable seating in the plaza as an alternative. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(03 of13)
Open Image Modal
Another example of design that says, 'Look, but don't touch.'"This is where you get the shade, in the trees, but you can't sit there because of the ivy," Kent says. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(04 of13)
Open Image Modal
Grace Plaza is an example of one of New York's first wave of bonus plazas, built in 1974 in an exchange for extra floor space. But by 1980, William H. Whyte would describe the space as "a big, barren slab of a place ... so inhospitable to people that it came to be populated largely by drug dealers." The developer even suggested that they fill in the plaza with a mall -- but didn't as it would have been illegal."We had done a plan that would have made this a great public space," says Kent. "The plan was to put a fence so you could have it closed at night, so you can have all kinds of activity inside it, put chairs and tables and food kiosks and stuff like that."But Grace Plaza is just one of many such useless spaces. "The return to the public is nothing compared to the enormous benefits developers received," says Kent. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(05 of13)
Open Image Modal
After being built in 1934 as an "urban sanctuary," by the 1970s, Bryant Park had become a haven for drug dealers. A new plan opened up the park's entrances and removed hedges along the sides, as well as adding food kiosks and movable chairs. Additionally, the non-profit Bryant Park Restoration Corporation took over management of the park. Today, the park is not only safe, but populous -- a successful public space. "It's pretty welcoming," Kent says. "Clearly they want people to be here." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(06 of13)
Open Image Modal
This space, on 6th avenue, once had seating, which was later removed. The design of the lower and higher railings together makes it impossible to sit on the ledge of the plaza -- Kent gives it an "F-" on comfort. "People mess the spaces up -- they might sit on the plants and there are undesirables," Kent says. "So they marginalize the communities around them by providing spaces that aren't ones that anyone would want to use." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(07 of13)
Open Image Modal
Here, as Kent points out, the thinness of the ledge makes it difficult to perch alongside the trees, which, combined with an awkward height, sends a message: "It's sort of like, you can be here but you can't be there," Kent says. "There's nothing you could say is comfortable about this." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(08 of13)
Open Image Modal
"I would call this token seating," Kent says. "There's nothing else for people to dono food, no coffee -- you can go and be there by yourself, but it's more about the trees and the paving materials." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(09 of13)
Open Image Modal
"This is an architectural photograph which you can take every day almost all day, because you'll never see anyone there," Kent says, of this space in Lincoln Center. "That's why this is designed this way -- for the photograph."One trend Kent notes in some of the public spaces of New York is this privileging of design over human use. "What can you do?," Kent asks, "You can sit, and you can walk. You can't touch the water. You can't go in the water. You can't touch the art. The number of things to do here are pretty limited. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(10 of13)
Open Image Modal
It's not just public spaces that can create or neuter lively communities, but also the nature of the buildings that line our streets. Kent calls this Cooper Union building known as 41 Cooper Square, "a grotesque, harsh, alienating, disgraceful, ugly, awful, shouldn't be in a city building that is the pride of Cooper Union." "There's nothing public or inviting about it," he says. "And it contrasts dramatically with everything else in the neighborhood." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(11 of13)
Open Image Modal
Buildings don't have to be out of place to alter the kind of street life that goes on below them. This wall, the base of the Museum of Modern Art, is "one of the longest blank walls in New York City," according to Kent, who points to this sort of architectural feature as one method of privatization used by building owners. "People don't walk down here, or they walk fast," Kent says. "They don't have a good experience, there's no reason to be here, there's nothing inviting about it and you don't know what's behind it." (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(12 of13)
Open Image Modal
"The vast number of the over 500 spaces of this type have never measured up to the vision that people had when they developed them," Kent says. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)
(13 of13)
Open Image Modal
"These places still speak to this old fear of who might use these spaces, rather than asking, how do we get more people to use them?" Kent says. "Once you turn that corner the value of the properties around are significantly higher -- you could enhance the lives of millions of people in six months if you wanted to." Pictured: The reading room at Bryant Park, which Kent describes as "really about inviting people and helping people to feel comfortable. (credit:Project for Public Spaces)