The Republicans Investigating Planned Parenthood Might Have A Teensy, Tiny Bias

If you thought the Benghazi panel was bad, just wait.

The eight Republican members of the Select Investigative Panel who will probe the practices of “big abortion providers” -- which everyone understands to mean Planned Parenthood -- have spent years trying to defund the reproductive health provider and restrict women's access to abortion.

The release, earlier this year, of sting videos made by an anti-abortion group that show Planned Parenthood staff members discussing fetal tissue donations for research has led to Republican claims that Planned Parenthood profited from the donations. Federal law allows the organization to accept reimbursements to cover the processing and transfer of the tissues. Planned Parenthood has insisted that it has done nothing illegal, and numerous state and federal investigations have found no evidence of wrongdoing.

The health provider receives over $500 million in federal funds annually, money that derives from Medicaid reimbursements and the Title X program, which provides services to low-income women such as cancer screenings, contraception and tests for sexually transmitted disease. The Hyde Amendment, a provision that has been routinely inserted into appropriations bills for decades, prevents federal funds from going toward most abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother's life is in danger.

In his Friday announcement of the eight appointees to the panel, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said the group would “focus on the grisly practices of big abortion providers,” without mentioning Planned Parenthood by name.

“Recent videos exposing the abortion-for-baby-parts business have shocked the nation, and demanded action,” Boehner said in a statement. “At my request, three House committees have been investigating the abortion business, but we still don’t have the full truth. Chairman [Marsha] Blackburn and our members will have the resources and the subpoena power to get to the bottom of these horrific practices, and build on our work to protect the sanctity of all human life.”

Planned Parenthood responded to the announcement by saying that it is cooperating with the investigations even though they are the result of “false and discredited claims.”

“Regardless of whether these investigations are focused on uncovering facts or pursuing a political agenda, we will continue to share the facts with all of these committees, which include that fetal tissue donation for medical research is an important but tiny part of Planned Parenthood's work in just two states, that we've had guidance in place for more than a decade that goes well beyond the legal requirements, and that even doctored and discredited videos show no wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood,” said Eric Ferrero, the organization’s vice president for communications.

Democrats, for their part, are weighing whether to boycott the panel investigating Planned Parenthood, calling it a waste of taxpayer dollars. They've compared the Planned Parenthood effort to the House Select Committee on Benghazi, which questioned former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for 11 hours Thursday to generally underwhelming effect.

All eight Republican appointees to the panel have 100 percent ratings from the National Right to Life Committee. Here's how each of them has contributed to conservative efforts to chip away at access to abortion.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.)

Blackburn, who will chair the panel, has previously served as a leader in her party’s efforts to restrict abortion access. In 2013, she took charge of the floor debate over an earlier version of a 20-week ban after Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), the sponsor of the bill, defended its lack of a rape exception by saying that “the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low.”

Controversies over rape exceptions continued to follow subsequent 20-week ban efforts. This year, Blackburn co-sponsored a bill that was abandoned by her party’s leadership after an internal revolt by Republicans who were concerned that language in the bill requiring a woman to report her rape to the police to qualify for an exception from its restrictions would alienate young voters. Blackburn, for her part, argued that the bill would help women by getting rid of rapists.

Blackburn sponsored the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act in an attempt to codify the Hyde Amendment into federal law. She also sponsored the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, which aimed to take the federal funds used by Planned Parenthood to provide STD tests, contraception and cancer screenings, and redirect them to other health centers instead. Various states have beaten Congress to the punch by cutting off Planned Parenthood's Title X funds.

Rep. Joe Pitts (Penn.)

Pitts’ Protect Life Act invited controversy because it would have allowed a doctor to not only deny a patient an abortion in the case of a life-threatening emergency, but also refuse to transfer the patient to a facility or provider that could perform the abortion instead. Federal law requires hospitals that receive federal funds to treat -- or if they won’t treat, transfer -- a patient who needs an abortion in an emergency.

Rep. Diane Black (Tenn.)

Black was the sponsor of a 20-week abortion ban this year -- the one that replaced Blackburn’s -- that would have allowed victims of rape to have an abortion if they received medical treatment or counseling at least 48 hours before the procedure.

Rep. Larry Bucshon (Ind.)

Bucshon, who has said that “abortion, of course, for any reason, is wrong,” also sponsored the bill to redirect Title X funds for cancer screenings, contraception and STD tests, among other services, away from Planned Parenthood.

Rep. Sean Duffy (Wis.)

Duffy has said that “health care doesn’t mean Planned Parenthood, and Planned Parenthood doesn’t mean women’s health care.” He introduced a bill that would allow states to exclude Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs because it offers abortion, provoking a veto threat from the White House. A number of states are currently defending the terminations of their Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood, based on the sting videos, in court.

Rep. Andy Harris (Md.)

Harris wrote an amendment to an appropriations bill that would have banned all multistate insurance plans offered through the Affordable Care Act from covering abortion except in cases of rape, incest or life endangerment.

In attacking the ACA’s contraceptive mandate that requires employers to cover various forms of birth control with no copay, Harris equated the mandate with the church burnings his mother saw growing up in Ukraine.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (Mo.)

Hartzler co-sponsored a bill that would ban the abortion method used in nearly all second-trimester abortions. Judges have blocked similar state-level legislation in Oklahoma and Kansas.

Rep. Mia Love (Utah)

Love may need to sort out her language around “choice.” When she was running for Congress, she said in an interview with Fox News about the so-called Republican "war on women" that she wanted “more free choice, more liberties than anything else."

“I believe that you have more choices before somebody ends up getting pregnant,” she said. “And I think it’s important that we’re able to have the freedom to exercise that choice, and it’s up to you how you want to do that.”

Myths About Abortion That Need To Be Busted
MYTH: Abortion is dangerous.(01 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Over 99.75 percent of abortions do not cause major medical problems.Less than one-quarter of 1 percent of abortions performed in the United States lead to major health complications, according to a 2014 study from the University of California, San Francisco, that tracked 55,000 women for six weeks after their abortions. The researchers note that this makes an abortion statistically about as risky as a colonoscopy.If that fact seems surprising, consider how American pop culture misrepresents the risks of abortion: Nine percent of film and television characters who have abortions die as a direct result of the procedure, according to another 2014 study from UCSF. (credit:Getty Images)
2. MYTH: Medical abortions -- those performed using pills -- are still fringe.(02 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: About one in five abortions are medical abortions.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 19 percent of abortions in 2011 were medical abortions and that 28.5 percent of those took place in the first nine weeks of pregnancy. The Guttmacher Institute also found that medical abortions increased substantially from 2008 to 2011, meaning more women have ended their pregnancies with this alternative to surgery.

3. MYTH: Women who get abortions will regret it, and are more likely to suffer mental health issues.
(03 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Most women will not regret their decision, and are no more likely to experience mental health problems than women who carry an unplanned pregnancy to term.While many women experience mixed emotions after an abortion, 95 percent of women who have abortions ultimately feel they have made the right decision, according to an August 2013 study from UCSF. "Experiencing negative emotions postabortion is different from believing that abortion was not the right decision," the researchers explained. Furthermore, while unplanned pregnancies often cause emotional stress, there is no evidence to suggest that women who choose to terminate their pregnancies will be more likely to suffer from mental health issues, according to a 2008 report from the American Psychological Association that investigated all relevant medical studies published since 1989.The APA found that past studies claiming abortion causes depression and other mental health problems consistently failed to account for other risk factors, particularly a woman's medical history. The APA accounted for these factors and found that, among women who have an unplanned pregnancy, those who have abortions are no more likely to experience mental health problems than those who carry the pregnancy to term.
4. MYTH: Fetuses experience pain during abortions.(04 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Fetuses cannot feel pain until at least the 24th week of pregnancy. Experts ranging from Britain’s Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists agree with that timeline. In fact, research from UCSF found that fetuses can't perceive pain before 29 or 30 weeks of development.Then why have so many states banned abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy? Perhaps misrepresentation of research is partly to blame: Many of the researchers most frequently cited by pro-life politicians told The New York Times that their research does not prove anything about fetal pain.
5. MYTH: The majority of Americans don't think abortion should be legal.(05 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Most Americans support a woman's right to choose.According to a Gallup poll from 2014, 78 percent of Americans think abortion should be legal in some or all circumstances. (Fifty percent said "some circumstances," while 28 percent said all.) What's more, in 2012, Gallup found that 61 percent of Americans think abortions that take place during the first trimester of pregnancy should be legal. (Nine out of 10 abortions in the U.S. do take place during that time period, according to Guttmacher.) (credit:Getty )
7. MYTH: Most American women have easy access to abortions.(06 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Women face a growing number of barriers to accessing abortions.More than 57 percent of American women live in states that are hostile or extremely hostile to abortion rights, according to the Guttmacher Institute. That represents a marked increase from 2000, when 31 percent of American women lived in such states. In 2011, 89 percent of counties in America had no abortion clinics. This is no accident: Across the U.S., lawmakers have enacted 231 new abortion restrictions over the past four years, according to a Guttmacher analysis from January 2015. As a result, many women have to travel great distances to reach an abortion clinic, where they may face 24-hour wait periods. These barriers particularly affect women living in rural areas and low-income women, who often can't afford to take time off work and pay for gas and a hotel room. Other laws force women to go through potentially distressing procedures, such as viewing their own ultrasound photos, in order to move forward with an abortion.
9. MYTH: Women would never have abortions if they knew what it was like to have a child.(07 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Most women who have abortions are already mothers.Sixty-one percent of women who had abortions in 2008 were mothers, and 34 percent had two or more children, according to the Guttmacher Institute. That number only increased after the 2009 financial downturn. The National Abortion Federation told Slate that between 2008 and 2011, 72 percent of women seeking abortions were already mothers. A study from Guttmacher found that mothers typically have abortions to protect the children they already have; they simply cannot afford to raise another child. (credit:Getty Images)
10. MYTH: It is dangerous to perform abortions in clinics that do not meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical clinics. (08 of08)
Open Image Modal
REALITY: Requiring abortion clinics to meet these standards does little to improve patient safety and forces many to shut down.Currently, 22 states require abortion clinics to meet a set of restrictive and often arbitrary standards, dictating that they be close to hospitals and that their hallways and closets meet certain measurements. Clinics often need to undergo expensive renovations in order to comply, and leading doctors' groups say the laws do little to improve patient safety.What's more, 11 states now require that doctors at abortion clinics obtain admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, but many hospitals flat-out refuse to grant these privileges. As a result, hospitals essentially have the power to shut down nearby clinics. (credit:Getty Images)

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost