Rep. Xavier Becerra Is Also Involved In Immigration Reform Talks

Xavier Becerra 'Quietly Thinking' About Immigration Reform
Open Image Modal
WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 4: U.S. Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA) listens during a news conference on Capitol Hill on December 4, 2012 in Washington, DC. Xavier and other Democratic Congressional leaders spoke on their desire to avoid the fiscal cliff. (Photo by Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images)

Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), a key negotiator on immigration reform, said he and a bipartisan group of House members have been having “very quiet” conversations on immigration reform.

Becerra said the group hasn’t been public about these conversations and their efforts to move forward with immigration reform in the House. Instead, they have been meeting behind closed doors to discuss how they can work together in a bipartisan fashion to “break through the barriers that are keeping us from having a workable immigration reform.”

This comes as the “Gang of Eight” senators have been public about their efforts to introduce a bipartisan immigration reform bill by the spring.

Becerra, who is the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, said the conversations in the House have been occurring “for quite some time.” Though he didn’t provide a list of House members involved in the conversations, he said Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) is one of the key members involved.

“I know that I and others have been hoping for a long time to get to a point where we can pass a smart, sensible bill to fix our broken immigration system,” Becerra told VOXXI. “But at this stage, I’m not saying much more than that simply because I want to see something get done, and I think it’s important that we try to do everything we can to get it done.”

The Democratic congressman added that he wouldn’t discuss any further details until House members are ready to vote to pass an immigration reform bill.

“When we—in the House—are ready to vote to pass an immigration reform bill, it will be a great time to have conversations about how we got the 218 votes that we need,” he told VOXXI. “Until then, the work is getting to 218, and anything that diverts us from that task I think is not worth exploring.”

Immigration reform: 20 years in the making

Becerra arrived in Congress in 1993 with the mindset of passing legislation that would fix the nation’s broken immigration system.

Now, 20 years later, he said the landscape for passing an immigration reform has never been as promising as it is today. There is bipartisan support and President Barack Obama has made passing an immigration reform a top priority.

“Today I see a climate far more favorable to a sensible fix of our broken immigration system than I’ve ever seen before,” he told VOXXI.

But a lot has happened in the last two decades to get to this point. From seeing numerous failed attempts to pass an immigration reform to seeing partisan legislations that would round up families and deport children, Becerra has seen it all.

“Over the years, when it comes to immigration policy, we have seen the good, the bad and the ugly,” he said, adding that there have also been several milestones in the battle for immigration reform.

Overturning of Prop. 187 seen as first milestone

In 1994, Proposition 187 was introduced in the California State Assembly, where Becerra served one term before heading to Congress, and voters approved it. That same year, former Republican California Gov. Pete Wilson made Proposition 187 a key issue in his re-election campaign.

“He posted nasty commercials on television across the state talking about how ‘they keep coming,’” Becerra said about Wilson. “He showed images of individuals crossing the freeway, running and making it look like all those who were in our country as immigrants were criminals, drug traffickers and un-American.”

Many Latinos mobilized and fought back against Proposition 187 and politicians who supported the measure. Several lawsuits were also filed in federal court against it, and a judge eventually declared it unconstitutional.

Becerra noted that California has “changed dramatically” since then. Today, Latinos in California are more involved in the political process and the state is decidedly blue. He added that with the overturning of Proposition 187, “We saw that this country and our judicial system worked even for the most disadvantaged of us.”

2006 marches helped change course on immigration reform

Another milestone Rep. Xavier Becerra identified are the 2006 marches that took place in response to a proposed legislation in Congress that would have raised penalties for undocumented immigrants and classified them as felons.

The people who participated in the marches sought a rejection of the bill and called for an immigration reform that would pave a path to citizenship.

The marches, most of which were peaceful, ranged from a few hundred to hundreds of thousands of people. The largest one occurred in Los Angeles in March 2006—it reached 500,000 people.

Becerra told VOXXI the “greatest attribute” of the marches wasn’t so much the message it communicated in the halls of Congress.

“It was the message it communicated to our families and neighborhoods back home,” he said. “It sent the message that we could determine the course of immigration.”

Becerra added that the marches also “gave people a sense of empowerment” and made people believe they could change the debate over immigration reform “no matter who you were, what your income was or how well you spoke English.”

The marches also incited bipartisan support for an immigration reform bill introduced in 2006. Among the bill’s sponsors were senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ted Kennedy (R-Mass.), both of whom had introduced a similar immigration reform proposal in 2005.

The 2006 immigration reform bill passed in the Senate but died in the House. Similar bills were introduced in 2007 and in 2010 but neither passed as bipartisanship for immigration reform declined.

Inadvertently, the marches also fueled the growth of the Minutemen Project, an advocacy group that patrolled the U.S.-Mexico border. The group rapidly increased its membership and brought attention to a perceived need for more border enforcement, which became a common theme in the debate over immigration reform in 2010.

Biggest milestones: Dreamers and the Latino Vote

By 2010, calls for more border enforcement polarized the immigration debate, and there was little bipartisan support for the immigration reform bill introduced by senators Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

The bill eventually died because there wasn’t enough support for it. Furthermore, the DREAM Act, legislation that would’ve paved a path to citizenship for undocumented youth who meet certain requirements, passed the House in 2010 but was five votes short in the Senate.

Despite these failed legislations, Becerra said there are two significant milestones that “will go down in history” as major events that helped renew hope for immigration reform.

The first milestone he described is “the courage of the Dreamers to come forward and publicly say that they were undocumented youth.”

“Essentially, they dared our government and our society to kick them out, and it forced America to face the reality that the American people had been tangling with for decades,” Becerra told VOXXI.

The second milestone he noted is the impact of the Latino vote during the November 2012 election. A record 12 million Latinos turned out to vote. A whopping 71 percent of them voted to re-elect President Barack Obama over Republican challenger Mitt Romney, who picked up 27 percent of the Latino vote.

“I think that for the first time, Latinos could decidedly say that our vote made a difference and that even our worst enemies had no choice but to admit that Latinos decided who would be president of the United States,” he said.

Becerra is optimistic about passing immigration reform

Becerra said all these milestones—the overturning of Proposition 187, the 2006 marches, Dreamers coming out as undocumented and the Latino vote—led to this year’s momentum for immigration reform.

“I think there is good will to try to get this done,” he said of a bill that would reform the nation’s immigration system. “The only question left standing is whether there is sufficient good will on the Republican side to pass immigration reform this year.”

There are still a number of Republicans in the House who support more border enforcement and oppose an immigration reform bill that would pave a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Still, Becerra said he is optimistic.

And as the Senate “moves quickly and aggressively” to introduce and pass a bipartisan immigration reform bill in the next few weeks, Becerra said he hopes that in the House “there are enough individuals who want to move in that same spirit.”

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

10 Major U.S. Federal Immigration Laws
The Naturalization Act of 1790(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
The Naturalization Act of 1790 was our country's first set of laws dealing with citizenship. Applicants had to be "a free white person" of "good moral character." This excluded indentured servants and slaves. Good moral character was substantiated by establishing residence for at least one year in the state from where he was applying, and at least two years of residence in the country. The Naturalization Act of 1795 would extend that requirement to five years, and is still standard today. (credit:Flickr)
The Fourteenth Amendment, 1868(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
A Reconstruction Amendment that was added to the U.S. Constitution following the Civil War, the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment establishes for the first time that children born on U.S. soil would be conferred U.S. citizenship regardless of their parent's citizenship status, race, or place of birth. Last year, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 to Congress, and challenged this. The bill would require that at least one parent be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident for a child to be granted citizenship. According to the bill's text, the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, and "clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth."Prior to this, Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) introduced a similar bill in 2009. (credit:Getty)
The Naturalization Act of 1870(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
The Naturalization Act of 1870 explicitly extended naturalization laws to "aliens of African nativity and persons of African descent." This meant that for the first time, African-American children would be conferred citizenship upon birth. Asian immigrants and other people of color are excluded per the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795. (credit:Getty)
The Page Act of 1875(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
Named after Republican Representative Horace F. Page, this is the first U.S. federal immigration law to explicitly prohibit the immigration of a particular group: persons of Asian descent. Primarily meant to limit Chinese immigrant labor and prostitution, the Page Act prohibited the immigration of: (1) contracted labor from "China, Japan, or any Oriental country" that was not "free and voluntary," (2) Chinese prostitution and (3) criminals and women who would engage in prostitution. Ultimately, the Page Act severely restricted the immigration of Asian women. Only 136 of the the nearly 40,000 Chinese immigrants who arrived in the months before the bill's enforcement were women. And, it would pave the way for the Chinese Exclusion Act.In this picture, Michael Lin, chair of the 1882 Project, a coalition of rights groups seeking a statement of regret over that year's Chinese Exclusion Act, speaks on May 26, 2011 in Washington, DC, at the US House of Representatives in front of a reproduction of a 19th-century sign that aimed at rousing up sentiment against Chinese Americans. Lawmakers introduced a bill that would offer an official statement of regret for the act, which banned further immigration of Chinese to the United States and ended citizenship rights for ethnic Chinese. (AFP PHOTO/SHAUN TANDON). (credit:Getty)
The Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
Signed by President Chester A. Arthur, the Chinese Exclusion Act was the first federal immigration law to prohibit immigration on the basis of race. The bill barred all Chinese laborers, skilled and unskilled, from immigrating to the U.S. for ten years. It was made permanent by 1903, and was not lifted until the 1943 Magnuson Act. The 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark finally extended naturalization laws to persons of Chinese descent by ruling that anyone born in the United States was indeed a U.S. citizen. This editorial cartoon from 1882 shows a Chinese man being excluded from entry to the "Golden Gate of Liberty." The sign next to the iron door reads, "Notice--Communist, Nihilist, Socialist, Fenian & Hoodlum welcome. But no admittance to Chinamen." At the bottom, the caption reads, "THE ONLY ONE BARRED OUT. Enlightened American Statesman--'We must draw the line somewhere, you know.'" (Image Source: Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, vol. 54 (1882 April 1), p. 96. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons). (credit:Wikimedia Commons)
The Naturalization Act of 1906(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
The Naturalization Act of 1906 further defined the naturalization process: the ability to speak English was made a requisite for immigrants to adjust their status. (credit:Flickr Creative Commons)
The Immigration Act of 1924(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
U.S. President Coolidge signed this U.S. federal bill into law. It capped the number of immigrants who could be admitted entry to the U.S. and barred immigration of persons who were not eligible for naturalization. And, as the Naturalization Act of 1790 required, an immigrant had to be white in order to naturalize. The quotas varied by country. Image Source: Flickr Creative Commons, NYCMarines. (credit:Flickr Creative Commons)
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (The McCarran-Walter Act)(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
The McCarran-Walter Act kept up the controversial Immigration Act of 1924, but formally ended Asian exclusion. (credit:Flickr Creative Commons)
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
When President Lyndon Johnson signed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, it abolished the quota system that favored immigration from Europe and limited immigration from Asia and South America. (credit:Wikimedia Commons)
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) is a piece of legislation that defined an array of issues to do with legal and illegal immigration -- from outlining how border patrol agents should administer visa processing, to the minutiae of how to handle deportation proceedings -- IIRIRA established enforcement and patrolling practices. (credit:AP)