Rothko Defaced: Vladimir Umanets Vandalizes Tate Painting, Blames It On Duchamp (TWITTER, PHOTOS)

'I Didn't Destroy The Picture'
|

Vladimir Umanets approached Mark Rothko's 1958 canvas "Black on Maroon" at the Tate Modern in London on Sunday and scrawled an odd message on the bottom right corner. A blatant act of vandalism, you say? Umanets begs to differ. The artist seems to be part of a long line of attention getters who desecrate a work of art as a means of getting their own vision into a museum.

A visitor named Tim Wright was at the Tate Modern when the act occurred; he tweeted the events to a rapidly interested audience last night until #rothko was trending.

The graffiti on the bottom right side of Rothko's painting reads "Vladimir Umanets '12: A potential piece of yellowism." In case you were wondering, Yellowism refers to the art movement founded by -- you guessed it -- Umanets, along with fellow art provocateur Marcyn Lodyga. Its manifesto describes the movement as "not art or anti-art." In fact, "Every piece of yellowism is about yellow and nothing more." (Well, that clears things up.)

According to Reuters, police called the cell phone number listed on the Yellowism website and Umamets answered, affirming that he did in fact write over Rothko's painting, but "I didn't destroy the picture." Instead, he clarified, it was not vandalism, but a nod to Marcel Duchamp -- an artist who is best known for hanging a urinal in a museum in order to question society's assumptions about acceptable art.

Umanets told Reuters:

Umanets is not the first art vandal to cite art appropriation as the impetus of the crime. Earlier this year Uriel Landeros, also a budding artist, Picasso's 1929 "Woman in a Red Armchair" with the word "Conquista." (For the record, he thought Picasso would be proud.)

Like Landeros, Umanets was not acting out of disdain for the artist, telling BBC he was a big fan of Rothko's work. "Rothko is such a powerful artist. There will never be another Rothko in the world ever," Umanets said, also mentioning his desire to place Rothko's vandalized work "in the context of yellowism." (A compliment to Rothko, we're sure.) The famed American painter, known for his massive color-blocked canvases, has become one of the most valuable artists of our time. In May his "Orange, red, yellow" sold for $86.9 million at Christie's in New York.

The consequences of the crime will likely affect Rothko fans' ability to interact closely with the artwork, as investigations are already underway as to why protective glass was not in place.

Check out the following pristine Rothko works in the slideshow below, and let us know your thoughts about this audacious act in the comments section.

"Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950
(01 of09)
Open Image Modal
Untitled (Man and Two Women in a Pastoral Setting), c. 1940, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.53.All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(02 of09)
Open Image Modal
Untitled, 1941-42, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.35All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(03 of09)
Open Image Modal
Hierarchical Birds, 1944, oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.20All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(04 of09)
Open Image Modal
Sea Fantasy, 1946, oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.8All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(05 of09)
Open Image Modal
Untitled, 1949, oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.138All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(06 of09)
Open Image Modal
No. 8, 1949, oil and mixed media on canvas, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.147All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(07 of09)
Open Image Modal
Untitled, 1949, watercolor on paper, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.257All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(08 of09)
Open Image Modal
Untitled, 1950, oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, 1986.43.159All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)
(09 of09)
Open Image Modal
All images are from Mark Rothko, The Decisive Decade: 1940-1950, Skira Rizzoli, 2012.© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. (credit:© 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.)

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go