More on the Generic WH Vote

More on the Generic WH Vote
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

The Washington Post's
Chris Cillizza provides his
own take
on that "generic" White House trial heat we have been talking
about the last few days. He amplifies a point I tried to make, likely bolstered
by his own sources:

Although Bush is not named in the
question, survey experts believe that voters have a difficult time envisioning
anyone other than the current president when asked to think of a
"generic" Republican candidate for president. Thus, it follows that
in a poll where Bush's favorable rating was 38 percent and his unfavorable mark
was 59 percent, and where just 32 percent approved of his handling of the war
in Iraq compared with 65 percent who disapproved (including 54 percent "strongly"),
the "Bush effect" would hurt a generic Republican presidential
candidate's ability to compete with a generic Democrat.

It also follows that when actual
candidates are put into the mix, the Bush cloud seems to disappear.

That's about right.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost