The Rudderless Ship

Theallowed itself to become a war propaganda vehicle in return for the entree into the Administration that Miller brought them. These are acts they must answer for.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

These past few days the story which has convulsed journalism has centered around Judy Miller, the reporter who first gained fame helping the Bush administration pump up support for the Iraq war. Later she would go to jail for refusing to testify in front of a grand jury for reasons which grow murkier by the hour.

Miller’s work contributed to the death and disfigurement of thousands of people, many of whom are our own American service personnel, but what about those running the New York Times who let Miller turn the world’s most influential newspaper into a throbbing drum of war? Miller works for the paper, not visa versa, so what goes on here?

The paper itself describes Miller, their employee, as “an intrepid reporter whom editors found hard to control.” A Times reporter is quoted as saying “most people (on the staff) I talk to have been troubled and puzzled by Judy's seeming ability to operate outside of conventional reportorial channels and managerial controls." Douglas Frantz, at one point her nominal supervisor at the Times, says that he was told by Miller anent her work, “'I can do whatever I want.'”

When Bill Keller became the Times’ executive editor after the Jayson Blair scandal, which looks like a pimple compared to this one, the paper related that, “in one of his first personnel moves, Mr. Keller told Ms. Miller that she could no longer cover Iraq and weapons issues. Even so, Mr. Keller said, ‘she kept kind of drifting on her own back into the national security realm.’"

Before Keller, why did the paper continue to print her fictions when one of her editors states that, "There was concern that she'd been convinced in an unwarranted way, a way that was not holding up, of the possible existence of W.M.D."

Two answers come to mind: 1) She had some kind of hold over management or 2) and much more likely, the Times allowed itself to become a war propaganda vehicle in return for the entree into the Administration that Miller brought them. What these people did may not be war crimes but they are acts they must answer for.

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost