Some Hunger-Striking Mothers Were Put In Isolation At Karnes Immigrant Detention Center, Lawyers Say

Some Hunger-Striking Mothers Were Put In Isolation At Karnes Immigrant Detention Center, Lawyers Say
|
Open Image Modal
A view of the open air rec yard at the Karnes County Civil Detention Center on September 9th, 2013 in Karnes County, Texas. (Dominic Bracco II/ Prime for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Authorities at Karnes Detention Center in Texas have responded to a hunger strike launched by a group of 78 mothers this week by placing some women in isolation with their children, according to lawyers and advocates working with the detained migrants.

The group of detained mothers announced Tuesday that they had launched a hunger strike, and demanded that they be released along with their children while they pursued asylum claims outside of detention. The Karnes facility houses hundreds of Central American women who crossed the border illegally with their children during a surge of migration from the violence-plagued countries of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras last year.

Jonathan Ryan, the executive director of RAICES, a legal group that coordinates the pro bono program representing many women at Karnes, says the detention center’s staff punished three of the striking women by temporarily putting them in isolation rooms with their children.

“We’re talking about an isolation room with a bed, a toilet, a sink from which you have to cup your hands to drink water, and lights off until meal time,” Ryan told The Huffington Post. “They refer to it as a ‘cuarto oscuro’ -- a ‘dark room.’”

In a statement, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the Karnes facility does not have solitary confinement areas.

"U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) fully respects the rights of all people to voice their opinion without interference, and all detainees, including those in family residential facilities such as Karnes, are permitted to do so," the ICE statement reads.

Agency officials denied punishing hunger strikers and said it was investigating claims that an unnamed outside nonprofit had encouraged residents to refuse food in protest of being detained.

Ryan also said that detention center staff told some women who participated in the strike that their children would be taken away if they continued, leading some women to abandon the effort.

Rebeca Flores, a member of the Interfaith Welcome Coalition, a religious organization in San Antonio that works with immigrants, drives an hour every week to visit women in the detention center. She said one of the women she has visited several times over the last three months was placed in isolation with her 11-year-old son because she had helped organize the hunger strike.

“She was humiliated because her son was 11 and she was having to use the bathroom in front of him,” Flores told HuffPost.

The 78 undocumented mothers launched their hunger strike to coincide with Holy Week, saying that authorities refuse to release them and their children on bond to fight their deportation cases from outside detention.

“We came to this country with our children looking for help and refuge and we’re being treated like criminals,” a handwritten open letter in Spanish signed by the women reads. “And that’s not what we are, we’re not a threat to this country.”

The letter says that authorities won’t release some of the women because they have prior illegal entry charges on their records. Others, they say, have remained in detention even though they don’t have such charges and they have passed a “credible fear” interview -- the first step toward establishing a claim for asylum. Others can’t leave the detention center because the they say the bond is too high for them to pay.

The women write that they will refuse to work at the detention center or to send their children to the school established there during the hunger strike.

Some 68,541 unaccompanied minors crossed the border illegally last year, along with another 68,445 women traveling with children -- unprecedented figures for minors and family units that further polarized the longstanding debate over how to address illegal immigration. The vast majority of the migrants come from the so-called “Northern Triangle” countries of Central America -- El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras -- where homicide rates are among the highest in the world and problems with forced gang recruitment have pressed families to look for ways to send vulnerable children to the north.

One way President Barack Obama's administration has addressed the surge in illegal crossings by unaccompanied minors and mothers traveling with children was to expand the number of family detention beds, in an attempt to show that migrants who cross won’t necessarily be allowed to stay. The administration temporarily used a detention center in Artesia, New Mexico, to house migrant women with children, and constructed a 2,500-bed family detention facility at Dilley, Texas.

Vicki Gaubeca, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Regional Center for Border Rights, says family detention further traumatizes people who likely qualify for asylum based on claims of persecution in their home countries.

“There’s no amount of improving conditions that justifies locking up children and moms,” Gaubeca said. “It has a strong emotional and psychological effect on children, and the women who are basically there fleeing violence in their home countries. This is a really inappropriate way to deal with people who are applying for asylum in this country.”

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Why Latin Americans Really Come To The U.S.
It's not just about the 'American Dream'(01 of20)
Open Image Modal
The conventional wisdom says that most Latin American migrants who come to the United States are looking for a better life, inspired by the "American Dream." And it's hard to deny that there's a lot of truth in that.

But there's another side to the story. People leave Latin America because life there can be very hard. Poverty, political instability and recurring financial crises often conspire to make Latin American life more challenging than in the U.S., a wealthy country with lots of job opportunities.

Living on the northern side of the U.S.-Mexico border, it's easy to view Latin America as another world, isolated from the United States. But the truth is that the U.S. government has historically made life in Latin America harder by overthrowing democratically elected governments, financing atrocities and pushing trade policies that undermine Latin American industries, dealing blows to local economies. Perhaps instead of building walls, the United States should focus on being a better neighbor.

Here are 19 ways the U.S. government has helped spur immigration by making life harder in Latin America.
(credit:ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Took over almost half of Mexico(02 of20)
Open Image Modal
In 1846, shortly after the annexation of Texas, President James Polk ordered U.S. troops into disputed lands, precipitating a war against Mexico. The war ended with the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. This is what Chicano activists mean when they say "the border crossed them." Today, 33.5 million people of Mexican origin live in the United States. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5baea535e4b006f4f197d44b" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="22" data-vars-position-in-unit="25">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60584010@N00/3212637401" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="leiris202" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5baea535e4b006f4f197d44b" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60584010@N00/3212637401" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="23" data-vars-position-in-unit="26">leiris202</a>)
Colonized Puerto Rico in 1898(03 of20)
Open Image Modal
The United States invaded Puerto Rico in 1898 during the Spanish American War and has retained control of the island ever since. More people of Puerto Rican descent currently live in the United States than on the island. (credit:A member of the U.S. Army Honor Guard salutes the Puerto Rican and U.S. flags.)
Took over Cuba, put a naval base there, and only left when the new government allowed them the right to intervene at will(04 of20)
Open Image Modal
And yet somehow, U.S. politicians viewed themselves as liberators. Later U.S. administrations would use the naval base to jail suspected terrorists and hold them indefinitely without trial, also submitting them to torture tactics, according to Human Rights Watch. (credit:Wikimedia: Col. Theodore Roosevelt stands triumphant on San Juan Hill, Cuba.)
Invaded and occupied Cuba two more times(05 of20)
Open Image Modal
Because once wasn't good enough, the United States invaded and occupied Cuba again in 1906 and once more in 1912. It retained the legal authority to intervene in Cuba's affairs until the 1933 Sergeants' Revolt overthrew U.S.-backed dictator Gerardo Machado. (credit:WikiMedia: The leaders of the 1933 Sergeants revolution: Ramón Grau, Sergio Carbó and Sgt. Fulgencio Batista.)
Invaded Nicaragua and occupied the country for two decades(06 of20)
Open Image Modal
The United States invaded Nicaragua in 1912 and occupied the country until 1933. Shortly after the U.S. forces left, Anastasio Somoza took over, launching a decades-long dynastic dictatorship with U.S. support. (credit:WikiMedia: Fort on Coyotepe hill, near Masaya, Nicaragua, during the Nicaraguan Civil War and U.S. occupation, circa 1912.)
Invaded Haiti and occupied the country for nearly 20 years(07 of20)
Open Image Modal
Woodrow Wilson ordered the Marines to invade and occupy Haiti in 1915 after the assassination of the Haitian president. The troops didn't leave until 1934. (credit:PA)
Invaded the Dominican Republic in 1916(08 of20)
Open Image Modal
Mainly to collect debts, the United States invaded the Dominican Republic in 1916. The occupation lasted eight years. (credit:WikiMedia: U.S. Marines in action in the Dominican Republic, c. 1916-1920. )
Overthrew Guatemala's elected government in 1954(09 of20)
Open Image Modal
At the behest of United Fruit Company, a U.S. corporation with extensive holdings in Central America, the CIA helped engineer the overthrow of the Guatemalan government in 1954, ushering in decades of civil war that resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. (credit:Getty Images: 28th June 1954, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, right.)
Organized the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961(10 of20)
Open Image Modal
The CIA organized and financed a group of anti-Fidel Castro exiles in an ill-fated attempt to overthrow the revolutionary government. The botched invasion ended in disaster and Castro declared himself a "Marxist-Leninist" eight months later. (credit:Alamy)
Supported the overthrow of a democratically elected government in Brazil(11 of20)
Open Image Modal
The administration of Lyndon Johnson assisted the overthrow of the democratically elected Brazilian government in 1964. The resulting military dictatorship, which tortured thousands of opponents and "disappeared" hundreds, ruled the country until 1985. (credit:WikiMedia: U.S. Army officer Charles Murray walks with Pres. John F. Kennedy, left, and Brazilian Pres. João Goulart on April 3, 1962.)
Helped overthrow Chile's elected government in 1973(12 of20)
Open Image Modal
Gen. Augusto Pinochet, with the support of the Nixon administration, overthrew the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende, ushering in decades of violent dictatorship. (credit:Alamy: Former President of Chile Salvador Allende. )
Backed a military dictatorship in Argentina that killed 30,000 people(13 of20)
Open Image Modal
When the military overthrew the Argentine government and installed a dictatorship in 1976, the Gerald Ford administration responded by offering its wholehearted support and financial assistance. The dictatorship lasted until 1983. (credit:Former head of Argentina's military dictatorship Jorge Rafael Videla.)
Paid a failed rebel army to overthrow the Nicaraguan government (14 of20)
Open Image Modal
When the left-wing Sandinista government rose to power in Nicaragua, it did not please Washington. In 1979, the U.S. began years of financing the "Contras," a right-wing group responsible for committing atrocities and smuggling drugs into the U.S. with the Reagan administration's knowledge. (credit:Alamy)
Invaded Haiti again in 1994(15 of20)
Open Image Modal
One invasion wasn't good enough. The U.S. military returned in 1994. (credit:A U.S. Army soldier monitors the surroundings of the National Palace, on Oct. 15, 1994, in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.)
Fomented a rebellion in Panama in order to build a canal(16 of20)
Open Image Modal
The Theodore Roosevelt administration helped a group of Panamanian nationalists break away from Colombia, after that country's Senate rejected the terms of a deal to allow the U.S. to use its territory there to build a canal. After Panama broke away, the new country ceded permanent control of the canal zone to the U.S. government, which finally returned it in 1999, after years of protests. (credit:WikiMedia: Miraflores Locks, Panama Canal.)
Backed the Salvadoran military as it committed atrocities in the 1980s(17 of20)
Open Image Modal
El Salvador's military committed atrocities throughout the 1980s with U.S. funding, including -- but not limited to -- raping nuns, assassinating priests and killing hundreds of children in a single massacre at the village of El Mozote. (credit:AP: Former Salvadoran military officials. )
Refuses to control the flow of weapons into Mexico(18 of20)
Open Image Modal
Mexican authorities seized almost 70,000 weapons of U.S. origin from 2007 to 2011. In 2004, the U.S. Congress declined to renew a 10-year ban on the sale of assault weapons. They quickly became the guns of choice for Mexican drug cartels. (credit:Getty Images)
Helped create today's drug cartels(19 of20)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. funded the Guatemalan military during the 1960s and 1970s anti-insurgency war, despite awareness of widespread human rights violations. Among the recipients of U.S. military funding and training were the Kaibiles, a special force unit responsible for several massacres. Former Kaibiles have joined the ranks of the Zetas drug cartel. (credit:AP)
Pushes trade policies that lead to unemployment(20 of20)
Open Image Modal
One of the things that prompted millions of low-wage workers to abandon Mexico over the last two decades was the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. With NAFTA, cheap imports, particularly agricultural products, flooded the Mexican market, leaving farmers and other low-skilled workers without jobs. NAFTA is just one manifestation of free trade policies pushed in Washington that often have adverse effects in Latin American countries. Former President Bill Clinton acknowledged as much after Haiti's devastating 2010 earthquake, saying that opening up the Haitian market to cheap U.S. rice "may have been good for some of my farmers in Arkansas, but it has not worked. ... I had to live every day with the consequences of the loss of capacity to produce a rice crop in Haiti to feed those people because of what I did, nobody else." (credit:Getty Images: Demonstrators carry an oversized replica of a corn cob to protest the lowering of tariffs due to NAFTA.)