Lawrence Lessig on Overturning Citizens United

To overturn Citizens United will require either a change of the Court (not implausible, if a Democrat wins, not possible for a generation, if a Republican wins), or a constitutional amendment (unlikely through Congress, possible through an Article V convention).
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

These Questions originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights.

Answers by Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School, on Quora.

A: It's my view that the really awful consequence of Citizens United -- SuperPACs -- can be overturned without overturning Citizens United. SuperPACs were created by a lower court decision, grounded on Citizens United. That lower court decision is vulnerable. I predict the Court will overturn that when it gets the chance, and that will remove 90% of the problems created by Citizens United.

To overturn Citizens United will require either a change of the Court (not implausible, if a Democrat wins, not possible for a generation, if a Republican wins), or a constitutional amendment (unlikely through Congress, possible through an Article V convention).

...

A: It took a long time to convince people about the need for Net Neutrality. The core of that debate took off in 1998, I wrote about it in 2001, Tim Wu coined the term in 2002, and then activist groups started effectively translating it soon thereafter. But with campaign finance, the problem isn't getting people to understand the issue. The problem is to get people to see that there's a solution to it that we need to be fighting for. This campaign has done little to convey that fact. That's unfortunate.

...

A: Not without changing the way campaigns are funded. Look, we already have a pretty effective system of term limits -- it's called, leaving Capitol Hill to become a lobbyist. That's a lucrative alternative for many in Congress, and it only makes Congress more dependent on special interests. I'd favor term limits (if members had a chance to learn how the place runs, etc.) But I don't favor term limits before we change how campaigns are funded.

These questions originally appeared on Quora. - the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights. You can follow Quora on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. More questions:

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost