Obama's Deportation Relief Delay Could Dampen Latino Interest In Democrats

Obama's Deportation Relief Delay Could Dampen Latino Interest In Democrats
|
Open Image Modal
LOS ANGELES, CA - NOVEMBER 6: People vote at a school in the predominantly Latino Boyle Heights area during the U.S. presidential election on November 6, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. The election will decide whether Democrat Barack Obama serves a second term as president of the United States or is replaced by Republican rival, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)

President Barack Obama's decision over the weekend to delay, for a second time, a promised change to his administration's record-setting deportation policy will likely dampen Latinos' enthusiasm for the Democratic Party, according to a polling firm.

The White House cited concerns about close Senate races in multiple states when explaining the reasoning behind delaying executive action on immigration until after November's midterm elections. But polling data by Latino Decisions indicates that the delay may decrease Hispanic interest in voting for either of the two major parties, at a time when both Republicans and Democrats are jockeying to mobilize the increasingly important Latino electorate.

A poll published in June by the pollster Latino Decisions and the Center for American Progress Action Fund, an advocacy group, found that 57 percent of Latino registered voters would feel less enthusiastic about voting Democrat if Obama declined to use his executive power to change deportation policy. Some 54 percent of Latino voters said they would, in fact, be less enthusiastic about voting at all under those circumstances.

When presented with the opposite scenario, in which the president used executive authority to change immigration policy ahead of the midterm elections, 87 percent of Latino voters said they would be more excited about voting for Democrats.

Latino Decisions' Matt Barreto and Gary Segura resurfaced these June findings in a blog post Monday, pointing out that Obama may have missed an opportunity to galvanize Latino voters with his announcement over the weekend.

Sylvia Manzano, a principal with Latino Decisions, told The Huffington Post that Obama also likely made the situation worse by publicly promising to act and then backing off.

"The thing that is peculiar is that he is the one that called press conferences saying he was going to do something this summer," Manzano told HuffPost on Tuesday. "The reason people are upset is because the White House manufactured this entire scenario ... It just feels like a trick, more than anything else, because had they not said anything, expectations would not have been so high."

Latinos don't account for a large share of the electorate in many of states with close U.S. Senate races, according to the Pew Research Center, which could make it easier for the Democratic Party not to factor the Latino vote into its calculations in those areas.

Manzano pointed out, however, that in states like Colorado and North Carolina, the growing Latino vote may yet play an important role in the midterms.

"I do think there are places where it's going to be close, and they did themselves no favors by squandering this opportunity," Manzano said of the Democrats. "They could have rallied Latino voters around this."

Manzano added that the GOP has likewise wasted opportunities to build credibility among Latino voters. Republicans, especially in the U.S. House of Representatives, have repeatedly blocked efforts at reform. In August, House Republicans voted for a second time to deport people illegally brought to the U.S. as children, who are currently exempted from deportation under the president's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA.

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

6 Misconceptions About The Border
The U.S.-Mexico border is violent(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
It certainly is in some places, but those don't tend to be on the U.S. side. In fact, El Paso, Texas and San Diego, California are the two safest cities in the country, according to Congressional Quarterly. While Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has repeatedly said the border in her state is dangerous, crime statistics reported by USA Today and The Huffington Post show that violent crime has dropped along the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona, as well as California, New Mexico and Texas. (credit:AP)
The porous U.S.-Mexico border is vulnerable to terrorists(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
That’s not the assessment of the U.S. government. The Mexico section of the most recent State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism reads:
No known international terrorist organization had an operational presence in Mexico and no terrorist group targeted U.S. citizens in or from Mexican territory. There was no evidence of ties between Mexican criminal organizations and terrorist groups, nor that the criminal organizations had political or territorial control, aside from seeking to protect and expand the impunity with which they conduct their criminal activity.
H/T: Washington Office on Latin America.
(credit:In this photo provided by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a silver Jeep Cherokee that suspected smugglers were attempting to drive over the U.S.-Mexico border fence is stuck at the top of a makeshift ramp early Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012 near Yuma, )
The border is insecure(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
Depends on how you define "secure." By practically all measurements, the border is at its most secure point in recent history. There's more than 20,000 Border Patrol agents stationed along the border now -- about double the number since 2004. Apprehensions along the border, one of the most reliable measures of illegal entry, are at their lowest level in 40 years. But politicians have yet to agree on how to define what "secure" will mean for legal purposes. (credit:In this Sept. 4, 2012, photo, Max Pons, manager of the Nature Conservancy's southernmost preserve, walks past the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Brownsville, Texas. (AP))
Obama has been soft on enforcement(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
Not so. In fact, it's one of the biggest gripes immigration activists have with him. While Obama has exempted many people who came to the United States as children from deportation, he has also set records, deporting over 400,000 people last fiscal year and removing more migrants in one term than George W. Bush did in two. (credit:A group of undocumented immigrants wait in line while being deported to Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry in Nogales, Ariz., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP))
The U.S. hasn't committed enough resources to securing the border(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
Again, depends on who you ask. The $18 billion the federal government spent on border enforcement in the 2012 fiscal year was more than it spent on than on other law enforcement agencies combined, according to the Migration Policy Institute -- about 15 times more than it did in the mid-1980s. Is that enough, especially in a context in which illegal immigration stands at net zero? If, not, what is? (credit:In this Aug. 9, 2012 file photo, a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle keeps watch along the border fence in Nogales, Ariz. (AP))
Illegal immigration continues to skyrocket(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
Nope. For all the talk from outraged politicians, you'd think that immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border remains at historically high levels. In fact, illegal immigration from Mexico has dropped to net zero or less, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. (credit:In this May 18, 2006 file photo, a man rests his hands on a fence looking out to the United States from a Mexican customs station after being detained by U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona and returned to Mexico in Nogales, Mexico. The border near Nogales is c)