ACLU Sues Border Patrol, Immigration Officials Over Voluntary Departures Program

Border Patrol Sued Over Deportations
|

WASHINGTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit against the federal government Tuesday over its voluntary departures program, through which the group alleges officials often use misinformation to pressure undocumented immigrants to sign away their rights before being forced out of the country.

The program helps the government rack up removals of undocumented immigrants, which reached a record of more than 400,000 last year. But the policy works differently than the usual broader detention and removal process: Border patrol or immigration agents give detained unauthorized immigrants the option to sign a form that will lead to their immediate removal -- sometimes within hours.

For most, that means leaving the country before they can talk to a lawyer, see their family or, the ACLU argues, receive necessary information that would help them realize they have other options.

Sean Riordan, staff attorney for the ACLU of San Diego & Imperial Counties, said the process contrasts with what most Americans see in the criminal justice system, where defendants can waive their trial rights, but only if they know the consequences of choosing to do so.

"What happens here is essentially the same thing," Riordan said, "except instead of people being given good information and being able to make a reasoned and intelligent decision whether to give up their rights to fight their case and stay here with their families, they're put under immense pressure and they're provided misstatements and sometimes threatened."

The class-action suit, Lopez-Venegas v. Napolitano, was filed by the ACLU of California, the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project and Cooley LLP on behalf of seven plaintiffs. One of them, Samuel Nava, alleges he was told by Customs and Border Protection agents he would be detained for months if he didn't sign the voluntary departure form and that an immigration judge could not grant him relief, even though he was engaged to his now-wife, a U.S. citizen.

Another plaintiff, Ana Maria Dueñas, only speaks Spanish but was allegedly given a voluntary departure form in English. She also claims she was misinformed about the ability of her U.S. citizen family members to eventually petition for her legal status.

The ACLU isn't trying to do away with the voluntary departures program as a whole, Riordan said, but wants further safeguards put in place.

For one, the ACLU argues that undocumented immigrants should be made aware of the 10-year ban on returning to the U.S. legally once they are found to have been in the country without authorization. Riordan said that some are told that once back in their native country, they can apply to return -- which is true -- but federal agents falsely imply the process will be a quick one.

The ACLU also recommends that undocumented immigrants be allowed to consult with an attorney or a trusted friend or family member so they can consider whether they should instead go through the immigration court system, which could allow them to remain in the U.S. They should not be pressured to quickly make a decision or to choose voluntary departure over their other options, the ACLU contends.

Advocacy group Cuentame joined with the ACLU to draw attention to the voluntary departures program, setting up a website and asking readers to call in about stories of abuse at the border.

Cuentame also produced a video about the story of one man, Ildefonso Martinez Sanchez, who signed a voluntary departure form in March 2012 and was sent from San Diego, Calif., to Mexico.

His family said he wasn't allowed to make a phone call and was pressured by border agents to agree to voluntary departure, even though he may have made a good case for deportation relief had he seen a judge. Martinez Sanchez later attempted to cross the border in Arizona to return to his family, then became lost in the desert. He died on the way, after spending six days outside, sick and alone.

He was married and had five children who are U.S. citizens. One of those children, Gladys Dominguez, appears in the Cuentame video, speaking about her father's deportation and death.

"Everything is very different," she says in Spanish. "It's very difficult to see my brothers, and my sad little sister. ... It really hurts."

Watch the Cuentame video below:

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Bipartisan Immigration Plan's Key Provisions
"Gang Of Eight"(01 of08)
Open Image Modal
A bipartisan group of senators have come together to address the issue of immigration reform. The group consists of four members of each party -- Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Bob Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado, plus Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain of Arizona and Jeff Flake of Arizona. Their framework was announced Monday. (credit:Getty Images)
Pathway To Citizenship(02 of08)
Open Image Modal
A "tough but fair" road to citizenship is the main tenet of the bipartisan immigrant plan. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is the most significant supporter of this idea, giving hope to those who doubt Republicans will support the plan. (credit:AP)
The New Process (03 of08)
Open Image Modal
The new process of obtaining citizenship would be just that -- a process. Probationary citizens would be required to pass an additional background check, learn English, pay taxes and show that they have a history of employment to apply for permanent residence and a green card. Undocumented immigrants will receive green cards after all probationary citizens have been processed, ensuring that documented immigrants are addressed first. Separate processes would be designed for young undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children and agricultural workers. (credit:AP)
Enforcement, Then Green Cards(04 of08)
Open Image Modal
The first goal, before any green cards are handed out, is to "demonstrate our commitment to securing our borders and combating visa overstays," the senators say in their framework. (credit:Getty Images)
Enhance Border Security And Drones(05 of08)
Open Image Modal
Emphasizing enforcement measures, the framework calls for increased boarder control, including more border agents and aerial surveillance and drones. A new system would be added to ensure visa stays are being adhered to, along with a commission of border lawmakers to aid legislation. (credit:Getty Images)
Increase Employment Verification(06 of08)
Open Image Modal
The senators have proposed to create an "effective employment verification system" that would help prevent identity theft while allowing employers to feel secure in hiring documented immigrants. (credit:AP)
No Benefits For Probationary Immigrants(07 of08)
Open Image Modal
Immigrants who are in the probationary category would not be eligible for federal benefits in the senators' framework. This addresses the concern that public benefits, particularly health-related ones, are being spent on undocumented immigrants. (credit:AP)
An Easier Path For 'The Best And Brightest'(08 of08)
Open Image Modal
The framework recognizes that a different sort of process would be needed for "the best and brightest," including highly-skilled workers and those with higher education. This has been previously addressed in the STEM Act which was ultimately vetoed by the White House. (credit:AP)